[:: Date : & The prophetic word that came forth  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  :: ::  ::] 


:: Date & Confirmation in the news and what people have said has taken place  ::  ::  

- -  ><>  - - - _________  - - -  <><  -




:: 10-21-16 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

UPDATE! - Now West Coast Being Hit Also - East Coast Under Cyber Attack, Massive Outages Reported Across A Variety Of Platforms

October 21, 2016 By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine


The U.S. east coast suffered a massive Internet attack this morning, October 21, 2016, causing sweeping outages across a number of platforms including Google, Paypal, Netflix, Twitter, Spotify and a host of others. The apparent cause according to Techcrunch this was a DDOS attack against DNS provider Dyn. DDoS is a type of DOS attack where multiple compromised systems, which are often infected with a Trojan, are used to target a single system causing a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Other sites experiencing issues include Box, Boston Globe, New York Times, Github, Airbnb, Reddit, Freshbooks, Heroku and Vox Media properties. Users accessing these sites might have more or less success depending on where they’re located, as some European and Asian users seem not to be encountering these issues. Dyn says that the DDOS attack affecting its customers is mostly impacting the U.S. East coast, and specifically Managed DNS customers. Engineers are working on “mitigating” the issue, according the DNS provider. Down Detector outage maps from a number of the aforementioned sites, show the affected area is the east coast as shown in the screen shots of those maps below, giving a visual of how widespread the damage has been throughout the morning. Dyn has issued a statement: This morning, October 21, Dyn received a global DDoS attack on our Managed DNS infrastructure in the east coast of the United States. DNS traffic resolved from east coast name server locations are experiencing a service degradation or intermittent interruption during this time. Updates will be posted as information becomes available. Upon recognition, active mitigation protocols were initiated and have been working to resolve the issues. Customers with questions or concerns are encouraged to check our status page for updates and reach out to our Technical Support Team. Readers in the affected areas of the east may also have had issues accessing the comment section at ANP, as most of the morning the only way I could access the comment section was directly through the Disqus moderation dashboard because the comments would not show on individual articles and when attempting to hit reply via the email notifications, the following message occurred. BOTTOM LINE While there is no word yet on who is behind these attacks against the east coast of the U.S., it does hammer home why stories about how the CIA is planning cyber attacks against Russia, which was reported by NBC News just a week ago, can lead to retaliation, which could end up far worse than what those living on the east coast that were affected by this mornings attack, experienced. In the day and age of the internet, cyber attacks can be just as devastating and dangerous as physical attacks. [UPDATE] DYN says service has been restored. [UPDATE #2] Cyber attacks have begun again but this time the Down Detector screen shots all show outages on the east AND west coast... some sample screencaps below: 

:: 10-20-16 Infowars :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

‘It’s Become Terrible Around Here’: MIGRANTS Call For Merkel To Deport MIGRANTS

GERMAN migrants are hitting out at Angela Merkel's open door immigration policy and the influx of NEW migrants saying it has wrecked their standard of living

UK Express - October 20, 2016

The news comes after public broadcaster Rbb24 took to the streets of Berlin’s Berlin’s Neukölln and Kreuzberg districts to discuss the worsening crisis with the public. And the shocking comments show the scale of resentment brewing in the country as its tries to cope with an influx of millions of people. Last year Germany welcomed 1.1 million people alone but millions more have flooded into the country over the past five years. Now foreign nationals who have lived in the country have expressed their concerns about the impact it is having on their standard of living. ne woman who identified herself as a National Democratic Party voter said: “Today’s refugees get social housing, welfare payments. And this, and that, and this. Why? Im a foreigner myself.” hile another woman who wore a bright hijab said: “It’s become a little… terrible around here. Not like it used to be.” Too many people came to Neukölln. When they come they have to earn a living. 

[ :: 11-3-13 am service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc.  for the world hates the Christians more now than at anytime in history.  Even during the days Jesus walked on earth, it is much worse now and it is not going to get better because those that don’t believe the truth are going to come against you like never before because they don’t want you to know the truth etc.

:: 10-19-16 Los Angeles Times :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Yes, an after-school Satan Club could be coming to your kid's grade school

By Rick Anderson 10-19-16

Lilith Starr, a devil’s advocate in every sense, is in a rush to get her After School Satan Club started.

As founder of the Satanic Temple of Seattle, she’s under pressure from national satanic headquarters — located in the Colonial witch trials city of Salem, Mass. — to launch a counter-strike against grade school Christianity by opening an after-school Satan Club. “I think many people have the misunderstanding that we are some kind of tongue-in-cheek troll group,” said Starr, 44, a Harvard grad who sometimes dresses in church robes and, when circumstances demand, paints her lips and part of her face black. “But in reality we are a very serious religion, with our own shared narrative, culture and symbols, a code of ethics — our Seven Tenets — and worship in the form of activism.” The national movement is attempting to establish a dozen After School Satan Clubs across the country. Local chapters have applied for space at public grade schools in cities including Atlanta, Detroit, Washington, Portland, Ore., Tacoma, Wash., Salt Lake City, Tucson, and Los Angeles. The clubs are all seeking school district approval, with the Atlanta-area club saying it hopes to hold its first meeting by Halloween. The Los Angeles Unified School District appears to be the only school district to outright reject the club. In response to a Los Angeles Times inquiry Monday, the district issued a statement stating the club proposed for Chase Elementary School in Panorama City “does not meet the minimum requirement of having the school’s approval and, therefore, will not be offered at the school.” That rejection could lead to a legal challenge. The Christians may have the force of Heaven behind them, but the Satanists have the U.S. Supreme Court. A 2001 high court ruling in a civil case brought by the Child Evangelism Fellowship of Missouri held that when a government operates a “limited public forum” such as after-school clubs, it can’t discriminate against the kind of speech that takes place. The victory permitted the clubs to proselytize in public classrooms after hours. It also opened the school door for students of any faith, or no faith, to be taught the ways of Satanism. Fifteen years later, with the Christian-based Good News Club having expanded to hundreds of schools across the U.S., the Satanists are responding. While Good News Clubs are effectively Bible and faith classes for children, the Satan Clubs intend to preach scientific evolution of humankind rather than what they describe as the “superstitions” of organized religion. “We believe strongly in religious plurality and we fight for equal representation for all religions,” Starr said. “Whenever religion enters the public sphere, like the Good News Club at public schools, we take action to ensure that more than one religious voice is represented, and that is our intent with the After School Satan Club.” The Satanic Temple website says the group does not believe in a “personal Satan” or advocate evil, though it does embrace blasphemy as a legitimate form of expression. Starr’s temple originally planned to open its first club at a grade school in Mount Vernon, north of Seattle. The school board’s attorney said the district had no choice but to approve the request due to court rulings. But with space unavailable there until April, Starr said, the temple is now targeting Point Defiance Elementary in Tacoma, where the Satanists could likely start competing sooner with a Good News Club there. A school district spokesperson confirms the application has been made, but the school board has made no decision yet. “We think [satanic clubs are] especially important when religious clubs target young children ages 5 to 12,” said Starr, “because at these ages it can be hard for children to distinguish between official educators and the teachers proselytizing to them in the after-school clubs.” Starr, whose autobiography is called “The Happy Satanist,” has an English degree from Harvard and a master’s in journalism from Stanford. She says she battled depression, she confesses in a web bio, to “eventually losing her marriage, her house, her job and her friends due to an out-of-control addiction to nitrous oxide,” or laughing gas. She remarried and found Satanism reading her husband’s Satanic Bible, eventually forming the Seattle temple in 2014. She said the group, which now has 78 members, meets every other week in libraries, an occult book shop and other locations, always closing sessions with a “Hail Satan” invocation. Among their advocacy efforts was an appearance at a high school football game across Puget Sound in Bremerton. Dressed in black robes, the Satanists milled about in counterpoint to Bremerton High’s assistant football coach, Joe Kennedy, who liked to lead his players kneeling in prayer on the 50-yard-line after the game. Though much of the Navy town’s community supported him — so did Donald Trump at one of his campaign appearances — the school board ended up firing Kennedy for his refusal to stop, and he has taken the dispute to federal court. During a recent speech before the Seattle Skeptics Society, Starr said such publicity aids the temple’s fight against “the religious overreach that is just out of control right now across the nation.” She also outlined the group’s Seven Tenets, including a belief that “the freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend.” The skeptics clapped heartedly. 

:: 10-20-16 King World News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Before It Is Over This Decline Will Engulf Every Country On The Planet

On the heels of yesterday’s KWN viral interview with Gerald Celente This Is The Shocking Truth About How Bad The Economy Really Is In The United States, it appears that an already bad situation for the U.S. and the rest of the world may be about to get a lot worse. What Celente noticed after yesterday’s viral interview about the collapsing restaurant industry in the United States was this note from Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. analyst Paul Westra, who just cautioned: “We warn investors that restaurant-industry sales tend to be the ‘Canary that Lays the Recessionary Egg,’” He also stated this “may also represent a harbinger to a U.S. recession in early 2017.” For those who missed it, this was the stunning chart included in Gerald Celente’s KWN interview (see below). Yesterday’s KWN Celente interview went so viral that Bloomberg ran a piece today claiming that restaurant CEO’s are blaming the Presidential election for hurting sales… While parroting Celente’s KWN interview, Bloomberg was way off base with their conclusion. This was Celente’s conclusion in yesterday’s KWN interview: “It’s the economy, stupid,” not the presidential elections or consumer uncertainty, that’s keeping people from eating out. According to research company NPD Group, 18 to 35 year olds, once the largest group of restaurant customers, are cutting back. Americans Are Drowning In Debt Indeed, a generation saddled with $1.3 trillion in college debt, working low-paying jobs or no jobs at all, and living with their parents in record numbers because they can’t afford to live on their own… along with 51 percent of working Americans earning less than $30,000 per year, 35 percent having debt at least 180 days past due, and 70 percent having less than $1,000 in savings… eating out is not an option, it’s a luxury! More than a restaurant recession, it is a precursor of a national recession. Celente spoke with KWN again today and stated: “Eric, just look at the chart that shows the University of Michigan’s Confidence Composite, which forecasts each economic collapse after the highlighted yellow circles (see below). Stunning economic collapses after each of yellow circle Celente continued: “And if that’s not enough proof, Eric, just look at the collapsing Heavy Duty Truck Sales in the scary chart below: Celente concludes: “If you look at the way the heavy duty truck sales are collapsing, you can only compare that to the worst recessions in U.S. history. And the chart shows no signs of stabilizing. There is no recovery. These are the worst post-recessionary recovery numbers since the end of World War II. This Decline Will Engulf Every Country On The Planet Just look at what is happening in China, the world’s second largest economy — exports just plunged 10 percent. And if you look at Europe, their GDP is going nowhere even in the face of 80 billion euros of government and corporate bond buying by the ECB each month as well as negative interest rates. The bottom line is that this is a global recession and no one is going to escape it, and before it is over this decline will engulf every country on the planet.” 

[ :: 5-16-10 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. For the system as you know it is vanishing before your eyes, you can no longer rely upon your jobs, upon your banking institutions, all you can depend upon is a one world government and you cannot depend upon that. etc..

:: 10-20-16 International Man :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The Next Empire

by Jeff Thomas

Throughout history, political, financial, and military leaders have sought to create empires. Westerners often think of ancient Rome as the first empire. Later, other empires formed for a time. Spain became an empire, courtesy of its Armada, its conquest of the New World, and the gold and silver extracted from the West. Great Britain owned the 19th century but lost its empire due largely to costly wars. The US took over in the 20th century and, like Rome, rose as a republic, with minimal central control, but is now crumbling under its own governmental weight. Invariably, the last people to understand the collapse of an empire are those who live within it. As a British subject, I remember my younger years, when, even though the British Empire was well and truly over, many of my fellow Brits were still behaving in a pompous manner as though British “superiority” still existed. Not so, today. (You can only pretend for so long.) But this does suggest that those who live within the present empire—the US—will be the last to truly understand that the game is all but over. Americans seem to be hopeful that the dramatic decline is a temporary setback from which they will rebound. Not likely. Historically, once an empire has been shot from its perch, it’s replaced by a rising power—one that’s more productive and more forward thinking in every way. Yet the US is hanging on tenaciously, and like any dying empire, its leaders are becoming increasingly ruthless, both at home and abroad, hoping to keep up appearances. Warfare is often the death knell of a declining empire—both in its extreme financial cost and in its ability to alienate the peoples of other countries. In the new millennium, the US has invaded more countries than at any other time in its history and appears now to be in a state of perpetual warfare. This is being carried out both militarily and economically, as the US imposes economic sanctions on those it seeks to conquer. This effort has become so threatening to the world that other major powers, even if they do not have a history of being allies, are now coming together to counter the US. The US is encouraged in its effort by an unnatural alliance between the countries of Europe. Although Europe is made up of many small countries, often with dramatically differing cultures, who have bickered with each other for centuries, the European Union has cobbled them together into an ill-conceived “United States of Europe.” Although the relatively new EU is already clearly stumbling and is on the verge of fragmenting, their leaders are desperately attempting to hold the unlikely alliance together with the help of the US. Meanwhile, the other major powers of the world are going full steam ahead to ensure that, when the US and EU reach their Waterloo, the rest of the world will carry on independently of the dying empire. They are not merely waiting along the sidelines for the collapse to come, awaiting their turn at the top of the pecking-order. They are actively preparing their position to, as seamlessly as possible, take the baton at a run. The End of Dollar Hegemony Since the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944, the US dollar has reigned supreme as the world’s default currency. In 1944, the US held more gold than any other country, but in 1971, the US went off the gold standard, and since then, the dollar has been a fiat currency. The US has become increasingly cavalier in its abuse of the dollar—often at the expense of other countries. Russia and China dealt with the latest round of strong-arm tactics by the US to adhere to the petrodollar by creating the largest energy agreement in history. This and all trade between the two countries will be settled in the ruble and the yuan. Russia has since been active in creating agreements with other fuel customers, also bypassing the petrodollar. In creating these agreements, the Asian powers have unofficially announced the demise of the petrodollar. For decades, the US has applied its muscle to other countries, using the petrodollar. So, the Sino-Russian agreement stands, not only to end the petrodollar monopoly, but to create a decline in US power over the world, generally. A New SWIFT System Presently, the vast majority of economic transfers in the world pass through the SWIFT system, located in Brussels but controlled by the US. In recent years, the US has barred, or threatened to bar, other countries from the SWIFT system, effectively making it impossible for banks to transfer money and, by extension, causing the collapse of their banking systems. Russia has responded by creating its own SWIFT system. It’s entirely likely that, if Russian trading partners, such as Iran, are barred from the use of the Brussels SWIFT (or even threatened to be barred), Russia would extend the use of its SWFT to them. The creation of a second worldwide SWIFT would effectively remove the SWIFT threat from the US bag of tricks as an economic weapon. As long as Russia provides an effective money transfer service and does it without the intimidation that the US employs, it’s predictable that other countries would flock to the new system, in preference to SWIFT. Once other countries are fully on board, the US would have no choice but to interface with the new system or lose trade with those countries. A New Central Bank In recent decades, China and Russia have been expanding their economic powers dramatically and have periodically complained that their seats at the IMF table are unrealistically low, considering their importance to world trade. In 2014, China officially replaced the US as the world’s largest economy, yet the IMF has consistently sought to minimise China’s place at the table. It would seem that the West believes that it’s holding all the cards and that the Chinese and other powers must accept a poor-sister position, if they are to be allowed to sit at the IMF table at all. The West somehow does not seem to recognise that, if frozen out, the other powers have the ability to create alternatives. As with the SWIFT system, the Asian powers have reacted to US overreach, not by going away licking their wounds, but by creating a second IMF. The Russian State Duma (the lower house of the Russian legislature) have now created the New Development Bank. It will have a $100 billion pool, to be used for the BRICS countries. Its five members will contribute equally to its funding. It will be centered in Shanghai, India will serve as the first five-year rotating president, and the first chairman of the board of directors will come from Brazil. The first chairman of the board of governors is likely to be Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov. It’s therefore structured to be truly multinational. In creating all of the above entities, the BRICS will, in effect, have created a complete second economic world. In the latter days of the British Empire, we Brits seemed to be under the illusion that, even as our power base crumbled, we might somehow retain control by threats and bluster. The UK was utterly wrong in this and only succeeded in alienating trading partners, colonies, and allies by doing so. The same is happening again today. China, Russia, and the rest of the world, when faced with American threats and bluster, will not simply fold their tents and accept that the US must be obeyed. They will, instead, create alternatives. And they are doing so exceedingly well and quickly. At this point, the overreach of the US is not only enabling other powers to rise, it is forcing their hand to literally create the next full-blown empire. Editor’s Note: It’s always been true, as Bourne said, that “war is the health of the State.” But it’s especially true when economic times get tough. That’s because governments like to blame their problems on outsiders; even an imagined foreign threat tends to unify opinions around those of the leaders. Since economies around the world are all weakening, and political leaders are all similar in essential mindset, there’s good reason to believe the trend toward World War 3 is accelerating. Unfortunately, there’s little any individual can do to practically change the trajectory of this trend in motion. The best you can and should do is to stay informed so that you can protect yourself in the best way possible and even profit from the situation.

That’s exactly why New York Times best-selling author Doug Casey and his team just released an urgent video. Click here to watch it now. 

:: 10-20-16 Zero Hedge :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

David Rosenberg Calls For A Multi-Trillion, "Helicopter Money" Stimulus Package

by Tyler Durden Oct 20, 2016 10:40 PM

With the inherent weakness in US GDP and the rising probability of a recession (two weeks ago Bank of America modeled that the next recession would likely start roughly one year from now), Gluskin Sheff's David Rosenberg thinks that with monetary options exhausted it will take a fiscal boost in the trillions of dollars to kickstart the economy. These issues were discussed in an extended interview with Real Vision TV, where the chief economist and strategist at Gluskin Sheff proposed some radical policies to engineer the growth needed in nominal income. His ideas, some of which can be seen here in a clip of the interview, include helicopter money attached to a $2 trillion perpetual bond, massive infrastructure spending and measures to tackle the $1 trillion student debt load that has seriously hamstrung the economy. Whether the US will in fact experience the technical definition of a recession is a matter of fervent debate, with the odds something like 20%-30%, according to Rosenberg (60% according to Deutsche Bank), but with growth averaging around 1%, there is no doubt the economy is weak. “There are some people saying a recession is here right now,” Rosenberg says, “I don't think that we meet those conditions yet. But people say, well, look. Twelve months in a row of negative year on year industrial production, that's never happened outside recession, check. We've had now going into six quarters of profit contraction, year over year. That's only happened in the context of a recession, check. I mean, all that is true, but so much of this has been related to the oil shock that we had.” Rosenberg’s problem with monetary policy, now in its 7th year of unorthodox experimentation, is that it has become a weak antidote to structural problems in the economy (even if it is still quite potent at boosting financial asets). Fiscal policy on the other hand, if constructed right, could be the answer due to its very powerful multiplier impact. “I can't say that I know for sure, but it's the old Einstein adage about the definition of insanity,” Rosenberg said. “And we're finding that we're really-- if we're not hitting the wall on monetary policy, we're certainly seeing classic economics 101 of the law of diminishing returns.” In terms of infrastructure spending, he said that one lesson from recent history and the Great Recession is that you've got to have the credibility to convince people that this is going to be permanent and not temporary, in terms of the impact on the economy. “So it can't be transitory. It's got to be very big. With interest rates as low as they are, there's certainly the capacity. I mean, you've got a lot of governments around the world issuing 50 or 100-year bonds. So this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to borrow money.” A Couple of Trillion Dollars of Helicopter Money While companies have been taking advantage of these conditions to borrow money, the funds have not been invested in the real economy. Share buybacks have become more popular, while personal savings rates have increased amid the economic uncertainty. This all boils down to a big case for government spending, with monetary policy joining forces with fiscal policy in the form of helicopter money. “What you do with helicopter money is you finance it off the central bank's balance sheet because we're talking doing something very dramatic to reflate the economy,” Rosenberg said. “It's not a few hundred billion dollars. It's a couple of trillion...I know I'll get accused of bailing out the sinners, but, my lord, we've already done that. I mean, nobody went to jail.” One of the things holding the economy back is the $1 trillion student debt load, which he said has left 35% of males aged 18 to 34 living with mom and dad, not getting jobs and not becoming first time home buyers. Employment growth for the 65s and over is 7%, meanwhile, as the aging boomers have to work longer because they didn’t save enough for retirement. “Helicopter money is QE plus where, say, the treasury issues a perpetual-- call it, like, a century bond, a $2 trillion bond on the Fed's balance sheet. And so when that bond matures, it's, like, we're all dead in the long run at that point. And then the Treasury can use that money to stimulate growth. " The beauty of this idea, according to Rosenberg is that you don’t have to go through Congress, with such difficulty in achieving corporate or personal tax reform. “It would lead to a permanent increase in the monetary base. Inflation expectations would go up, which means that real interest rates would go negative. And the theory is that that would provide a bigger thrust towards getting what we all want, which is sustainable and accelerating nominal income growth.“ Real Risk of Fed Mistakes or Trump Trade War Sustainable and accelerating nominal GDP is certainly what’s required while the risk persists that we could be shocked into recession, or the Fed could make a mistake in raising interest rates too aggressively. “That's what happened in December of last year. They raised rates 25 basis points, but the overall financial tightening, in terms of what it meant for the dollar or in credit spreads and the stock market, it was really, like, 75 basis points of tightening. And the next thing you know, the economy slows to stall speed." Another concern for investors is the prospect of a Trump presidency, bringing with it the potential start of a trade war. That could provide the sort of exogenous shock to cause the economy to go into recession, Rosenberg stated, noting that historically all the recessions in the post war period have been created by the Fed. “The problem is that when you have the economy running on average 1% growth, or 1% plus, which is not a big cushion. And so, you know, it's a complicated question to try and handicap a recession on us right now. There's a lot of people out there that are convinced that a recession is coming.” To watch the full interview with David Rosenberg, visit Real Vision TV. You can access this and many more interviews with a free trial. Oh, if Rosenberg's idea gets traction - and execution - which it will eventually, as we have said since our first days in 2009, buy lots and lots of gold. 

:: 10-20-16 Mass Privatel :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Was "Google Home" designed to spy inside our homes?

Google Home (GH) is always listening to everything that goes on inside your home. It's like paying the NSA, sorry I meant Google, $129.00 to bug your home. Click here & here to find out about Google's close relationship with the NSA. GH does more than listen to music, it can control your lights, thermostats, radios, TV's, refrigerators, smart plugs and more. GH has partnered with Nest, Phillips, IFTTT and Samsung who also make the 'family hub refrigerator'. Google Assistant's new surveillance feature called “My Day,” gives you morning updates, weather, commute times and a summary of your schedule (assuming you opt in). At least GH doesn't have SEVEN microphones like Amazon's Echo. "Amazon Echo runs on Amazon Web Services. 

:: 10-20-16 Jewish Telegraphic Agency :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

With UNESCO vote, Palestinians’ bid for attention backfires

By Cnaan LiphshizOctober 20, 2016 5:45pm

(JTA) — If the latest draft resolution at UNESCO on “Occupied Palestine” succeeded in the Palestinians’ aims to reclaim the world’s attention, then it was a Pyrrhic victory at best and a setback at worst. Part of an effort on Jerusalem initiated at UNESCO in 2015 by the Palestinian Authority, the Oct. 12 vote saw a comfortable majority of states, including Russia and China, pass language calling on Israel “to cease the persistent excavations and works in East Jerusalem, particularly in and around the Old City,” as one clause reads. Only six countries, the United States and five European Union members, opposed the resolution and 26 abstained. Yet the specific charges in the text were largely eclipsed by the resolution’s failure to refer to Judaism’s holiest sites by their Jewish names. The erasure of Jewish ties to Jerusalem ignited a diplomatic dispute that is dividing UNESCO, embarrassing some of its member states and exposing the Palestinians to rebuke not only by Israel, but even by passionate supporters of their cause who are angered by what they perceive as an anti-Jewish bid to rewrite history. The UNESCO vote is part of a broader push by the Palestinian Authority to inject the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into international forums that are not designed to settle such disputes. And while the strategy is alienating some supporters, observers of Palestinian diplomacy say it is a discredited leadership’s survival tactic, meant to satisfy a disgruntled population and prevent the tragedy in Syria and the rise of ISIS from eclipsing the plight of the Palestinians on the world stage. Two days after the UNESCO vote, the diplomatic fallout already was generating significant dissent within the ranks of the United Nations cultural agency. Its director-general, Irina Bokova of Bulgaria, penned an unprecedented rebuke of the draft resolution passed by her own organization. “To deny, conceal or erase any of the Jewish, Christian or Muslim traditions undermines the integrity of the site, and runs counter to the reasons that justified its inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage list,” she wrote. The resolution refers to Jerusalem’s Temple Mount — site of the first and second Jewish Temples and a locus of Jewish veneration — only by its Arabic name, Al-Ḥaram Al-Sharif. The Western Wall, a remnant of the biblical Temple compound built by the Jewish King Herod and Judaism’s holiest site, is referred to as Al-Buraq Plaza – a term the Simon Wiesenthal Center says was lifted from Hamas literature — with “Western Wall Plaza” appearing only between quotation marks. When divisions over such things “carry over into UNESCO, an Organization dedicated to dialogue and peace, they prevent us from carrying out our mission,” added Bokova, who according to Israeli diplomats has maintained a largely fair attitude toward the Jewish state. Though UNESCO has passed several texts in recent years seen as erasing Jewish ties to holy sites, it was the first time she spoke out so clearly against the trend. Outraged, the Palestinian Authority essentially told Bokova to shut up about the draft resolution, which was submitted by seven Arab countries but is widely understood to have been initiated as part of a Palestinian push at UNESCO, which the Palestinians joined as members in 2011. However, in the days that followed, the Palestinians saw more pushback. Israel ridiculed the text and charged it typified a refusal by the Palestinian leadership to accept the Jewish people’s claim on any part of the Land of Israel. Both U.S. presidential candidates harshly condemned the resolution, and a U.S. State Department spokesman called it a cause for deep concern and one of several “recurring, politicized resolutions” that he said should not pass. The draft united Jewish groups across the spectrum in outrage; even Americans for Peace Now, which on Oct. 15 condemned Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands during a U.N. Security Council forum debate, criticized the UNESCO resolution’s “exclusionary and inflammatory language.” Traditional allies of the Palestinian cause wavered as objections to the text intensified. Mexico, which supported the text, had a change of heart, initially requesting a re-vote and then sufficing with a statement blasting the text as offensive and biased against the Jewish people. This was after it fired its ambassador to UNESCO, Andre Roemer, who is Jewish, for protesting his country’s “yes” vote. In a personal protest, Roemer walked out of last week’s vote in Paris, leaving his deputy to cast the vote for Mexico. Dozens of Czech lawmakers wrote a joint letter of protest to UNESCO over the vote, as did various U.S. lawmakers and several Christian groups, including the World Council of Independent Christian Churches. As discord continued to spread, even Brazil, which voted in favor of the text and whose Socialist government is regarded by critics as blatantly hostile toward Israel, expressed dissatisfaction with the text it supported. Tellingly, France was among 26 countries that abstained from the vote – a virage, or an about-face, from its customary role as “a leading figure in the Arab-led anti-Israel bloc,” according to UN Watch, an NGO that monitors anti-Israel activity at the world body. The French abstention followed an internal dispute that developed between the Foreign Ministry and Prime Minister Manuel Valls over the country’s support in April for a similar UNESCO text. Valls said publicly following the earlier vote that France should never have voted in favor. India, which supported the UNESCO resolution in April, also abstained, as did Sweden, Spain, Argentina and Slovenia. Both resolutions were opposed by the same six countries: the United States and the five European countries, including Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. Palestinian leaders are aware of the pushback but are pressing ahead anyway. They are “desperate to point to achievements to a population that is increasingly critical of Ramallah’s undemocratic rule,” explained Daniel Schwammenthal of the American Jewish Committee’s Transatlantic Institute. The decision to risk condemnation “could also have something to do with their desire to prevent the de-prioritization of their issue in light of the far greater humanitarian catastrophe in Syria and the rest of the Middle East, which has reduced international attention for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict,” he said. Officials from both Hamas and Fatah celebrated the UNESCO vote as a major diplomatic achievement and brushed off criticism as owing to “Israel’s influence over the West,” Khaled Abu Toameh, a Palestinian journalist from Jerusalem and critic of Hamas and Fatah, told JTA. Raphael Ahren, The Times of Israel’s diplomatic correspondent, said that the Palestinians moved ahead with the Oct. 12 vote to flex diplomatic muscle. The fallout, he added, was a genuine rejection of the “outrageousness of the text passed.” Schwammenthal, though, called the rebuke of the Palestinian gambit an expression of growing resentment internationally of Palestinian attempts after 2011 — the year Palestine was accepted into UNESCO — to “abuse, hijack or disrupt the work of international forums that have nothing to do with their conflict with Israel.” Schwammenthal pointed to a series of reports, statements and initiatives that reflect an increasingly critical and perhaps impatient attitude in European capitals and institutions toward the Palestinian Authority partly over this perceived abuse. The list includes a 2013 report by the European Court of Auditors accusing P.A. officials of pocketing money from the European Union, its largest donor. Another blow came in the international Quartet report in July, which for the first time blamed Palestinians for incitement, violence and a failure to get Gaza under control. And another landed this month when the United Kingdom froze millions of dollars in aid payments to the Palestinian Authority amid claims that the money is ending up in the hands of terrorists. Even Norway, a longtime supporter and major funder of the P.A., warned Ramallah for the first time this year not to give aid money to terrorists. At FIFA, the international soccer federation, the Palestinian delegation’s attempts to have Israel kicked out for political reasons is “creating frustration” and leading critics to point out how Palestinians have named soccer stadiums for terrorists, according to Shimon Samuels, the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s director for international relations. Ultimately “it wasn’t Israel that got a black eye at the UNESCO vote,” Schwammenthal said, “but the United Nations, whose reputation was once again stained; the countries that supported an outrageous lie, and primarily the Palestinians, who are using up international support to deepen the distrust of the only people who can give them a state, the Israelis.” 

:: 10-21-16 UPI :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Islamic State 'sleeper cells' kill dozens in Kirkuk, Iraq, power plant attack

By Andrew V. Pestano Follow @AVPLive9 Contact the Author | Oct. 21, 2016 at 7:08 AM

KIRKUK, Iraq, Oct. 21 (UPI) -- Islamic State militants on Friday attacked Iraqi government buildings in the northern city of Kirkuk as well as a nearby power plant, killing dozens of people about 100 miles away from Mosul, Iraqi officials said. Three police stations and an Iraqi political party headquarters were attacked within Kirkuk in the Kirkuk Governorate, whose governor later said the attack carried out by IS sleeper cells had been "foiled." At least six police officers and 16 civilians died in Kirkuk, while at least 13 died in the power plant attack in the nearby Dibbis village. "All of the militants who attacked the police emergency building and the old building of the Kirkuk police directorate have been killed, but a number of other militants are still in Dumez district," Iraqi Brig. Gen. Sarhad Qadir told BBC News. At least 12 IS militants, including suicide bombers, died in the attack. Kirkuk Gov. Najmaldin Karim told Rudaw that some of the IS militants who carried out the attack could have disguised themselves as refugees who recently fled a nearby city. "It was expected that ISIS sleeper cells would make a move one day in Kirkuk now that the Mosul offensive has started and they want to boost their own morale this way," Karim said. RELATED Allied forces continue sweep to Mosul; ex-governor wanted by Iraq over Turkey spat The Islamic State attack comes as Iraqi security forces, the Kurdish Peshmerga and a U.S.-led international coalition are engaged in an offensive to take Mosul -- Iraq's second-largest city -- away from IS control. Peshmerga forces on Thursday shot down a drone operated by the Islamic State in Nawaran, northeast of Mosul. The Peshmerga earlier this week said they had seen drones fitted with explosives operated by the Islamic State. 

[ :: 7-15-15 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. For I have warned you Russia is not your friend, I have warned you that China is not your friend, I have warned you that North Korea is not your friend and I have warned you that Iran is not your friend. etc.

:: 10-18-16 Daily Star :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Oct. 18, 2016 | 07:51 PM

US demands release of Iranian-American and father jailed by Tehran

Agence France Presse

WASHINGTON: The United States Tuesday demanded the release of an Iranian-American businessman and his 80-year-old father who were handed tough sentences in Tehran on espionage charges. "We are deeply concerned about reports that U.S. citizens Siamak Namazi and Baquer Namazi have each been sentenced to 10 years in prison," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said in a statement. "We join recent calls by international organizations and U.N. human rights experts for the immediate release of all U.S. citizens unjustly detained in Iran, including Siamak and Baquer Namazi, so that they can return to their families." Siamak Namazi, a well-connected business consultant who has supported reformist politicians in Iran, was arrested as he arrived in Tehran a year ago. His father, Baquer, was detained in February when he came to Iran to seek his son's release. 

:: 10-21-16 BBC :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

'Turing Bill' for gay pardons fails in Parliament

A bill that would have wiped clean the criminal records of thousands of gay men has fallen at its first parliamentary hurdle. The private member's bill would have pardoned all men living with UK convictions for same-sex offences committed before the law was changed. There were emotional scenes with one MP fighting back tears during his speech. The government, which has its own plans for posthumous pardons, "talked out" the bill, which will not now go ahead. Minister Sam Gyimah spoke for 25 minutes, reaching the time limit allotted for the debate. There were shouts of "shame" and "shameful" from angry MPs as the seconds ticked down and proceedings came to an end. SNP MP John Nicolson said he had secured government support for his bill, which was withdrawn when the Ministry of Justice published its own commitment to a "Turing's law" on Thursday. During Friday's debate Mr Nicolson accused the government of trying to "hijack" his plans. The government's rival measure, an amendment to the Policing and Crimes Bill announced on Thursday, would grant pardons for those convicted who have since died. Ministers say those who are still alive can go through a "disregard process" to clear their names. The government said it would not support Mr Nicolson's Sexual Offences (Pardons) Bill - which proposes a blanket pardon for the living - because it could lead to some people being cleared of offences that are still crimes. Speaking during the debate, Mr Nicolson said: "I have to ask the House, should we not prioritise the living over the dead?" His bill would have "set aside" nearly 50,000 convictions, about 15,000 of which apply to men who are still alive today. Mr Nicolson says he was motivated by his work as a BBC journalist in the 1990s: "I made a documentary in the 1990s looking at the discriminatory laws which criminalised gay men. "There were some shocking injustices. Men were arrested aged 21 for having 'under-age sex' with their 20-year-old boyfriends," he said. How would the Turing Bill work? The bill is intended to set aside only convictions made under: Section 12 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (buggery) Section 13 of that act (gross indecency between men) Section 32 of that act (solicitation by men), or Section 61 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 or section 11 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885. And it would do so only under the conditions that: The other person involved at the time the act was committed was a consenting partner aged 16 or above The act would not constitute an offence under section 71 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (sexual activity in a public lavatory) The act in question would not still be illegal for any other reason. The debate saw MPs from both government and opposition parties speaking in favour of moving the bill through Parliament. Labour Rhondda MP Chris Bryant made an emotional speech in favour of the bill, recalling gay and bisexual MPs who demanded the right to fight in World War Two, insisting they and others should receive "something that feels like an apology". Conservative MP Iain Stewart said that while he would support the government amendment, he believed it wouldn't go far enough. Mr Stewart said: "We can move forward in a much more symbolic way... a way which will really make a difference to many people in this country." A 2015 petition calling for pardons for the estimated 49,000 men affected by convictions for consensual gay sex was signed by over half a million people, including the actor Benedict Cumberbatch, who played Turing in the 2014 film The Imitation Game. Another signatory was Turing's great-niece Rachel Barnes. Speaking to BBC News in 2015, Ms Barnes said: "We've always considered that it is totally unjust that only Alan was given a pardon. "There were 50,000 other homosexuals who were convicted and not given a pardon. We would really like this to be put right now." 

:: 10-21-16 Bloomberg :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Duterte Bids U.S. Goodbye With Embrace of China and Russia

BY Andreo Calonzo Chris Blake David Tweed October 20, 2016 — 3:15 AM EDT Updated on October 21, 2016 — 1:51 AM EDT

U.S. says it’s ‘baffled’ by Philippine leader’s comments Despite rhetoric, Duterte hasn’t formally broken any accords Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said he wants to cut the cord with the U.S. and pivot to China and Russia, words that signal a deepening split with his country’s biggest military ally and that have prompted bafflement in Washington. Duterte made the pronouncement on Thursday during a state visit to Beijing, several weeks after he told President Barack Obama to “go to hell.” Since taking office in June, the brash 71-year-old leader has repeatedly questioned his nation’s links with the U.S. while touting the economic benefits of closer ties with China. “I announce my separation from the U.S.,” Duterte said to a packed room of business leaders in the Chinese capital after meeting with President Xi Jinping. Duterte also said he might go to Russian President Vladimir Putin and tell him “there’s three of us against the world.” The comments marked Duterte’s strongest yet in disparaging an alliance that has underpinned the U.S.’s Asia-Pacific strategy since World War II. Yet it remains to be seen whether he will follow through with actions such as jointly exploring for energy with Beijing in disputed waters or tearing up defense agreements that give the U.S. access to bases in the Philippines. The U.S. has strong ties with the Philippine defense establishment, and the nation’s citizens say they trust America more than China by a wide margin. “Symbolically none of this is good for the U.S., but in concrete terms the U.S. has thick skin,” said Malcolm Cook, a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore. “If the Duterte government starts to restrict U.S. access to Philippine bases or something like that, then the U.S. will have a problem.” State Department spokesman John Kirby described the U.S. as “baffled” by Duterte’s rhetoric and will seek an explanation when Daniel Russel, assistant secretary of state for East Asia and the Pacific, visits the Philippines this weekend on a previously scheduled trip. ‘At Odds’ Duterte’s comments are “inexplicably at odds with the very close relationship that we have with the Filipino people, as well as the government there, on many different levels, not just from a security perspective,” Kirby said Thursday. The U.S. remains committed to the two countries’ mutual defense treaty, he said. Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said he wants to cut the cord with the U.S. and pivot to China and Russia, words that signal a deepening split with his country’s biggest military ally and that have prompted bafflement in Washington. Duterte made the pronouncement on Thursday during a state visit to Beijing, several weeks after he told President Barack Obama to “go to hell.” Since taking office in June, the brash 71-year-old leader has repeatedly questioned his nation’s links with the U.S. while touting the economic benefits of closer ties with China. “I announce my separation from the U.S.,” Duterte said to a packed room of business leaders in the Chinese capital after meeting with President Xi Jinping. Duterte also said he might go to Russian President Vladimir Putin and tell him “there’s three of us against the world.” The comments marked Duterte’s strongest yet in disparaging an alliance that has underpinned the U.S.’s Asia-Pacific strategy since World War II. Yet it remains to be seen whether he will follow through with actions such as jointly exploring for energy with Beijing in disputed waters or tearing up defense agreements that give the U.S. access to bases in the Philippines. The U.S. has strong ties with the Philippine defense establishment, and the nation’s citizens say they trust America more than China by a wide margin. Why China's Territorial Disputes Could Mean War “Symbolically none of this is good for the U.S., but in concrete terms the U.S. has thick skin,” said Malcolm Cook, a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore. “If the Duterte government starts to restrict U.S. access to Philippine bases or something like that, then the U.S. will have a problem.” State Department spokesman John Kirby described the U.S. as “baffled” by Duterte’s rhetoric and will seek an explanation when Daniel Russel, assistant secretary of state for East Asia and the Pacific, visits the Philippines this weekend on a previously scheduled trip. ‘At Odds’ Duterte’s comments are “inexplicably at odds with the very close relationship that we have with the Filipino people, as well as the government there, on many different levels, not just from a security perspective,” Kirby said Thursday. The U.S. remains committed to the two countries’ mutual defense treaty, he said. For a QuickTake on Duterte and his nation’s economy, click here. While Duterte’s cabinet members often seek to tone down his remarks -- a routine they followed again on Thursday -- the president has kept repeating them. In his speech to the Chinese business leaders, Duterte said that the separation from the U.S. would be both military and economic, without elaborating. He’s also mulling plans to require U.S. visitors to the Philippines to obtain a visa. In a joint statement issued after Duterte’s speech, Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez and Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Ernesto Pernia said the Philippine Cabinet would move strongly and swiftly toward regional economic integration. “We will maintain relations with the West, but we desire stronger integration with our neighbors,” the statement said. Overseas investors, however, appear to have been unsettled by the mixed messages. The peso dropped to the weakest in seven years this month as $666 million fled from the nation’s local-currency stocks and bonds since Aug. 1. Earlier on Thursday, China announced a resumption of bilateral talks on contested territory in the South China Sea, an issue that had previously pushed the Philippines closer to America. China’s Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs Liu Zhenmin hailed a “new stage of maritime cooperation.” “It’s a win-win for both,” said Kang Lin, deputy director of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, China’s only state-backed research institution dedicated to South China Sea research. “The Philippines can reap a commercial harvest from his trip, including much needed infrastructure funding. And for China, it’s the temporary end of the South China Sea migraine that lasted for the past couple of years.” $24 Billion Duterte will travel next week to Japan, where government officials declined to comment on his statements in Beijing. Japan is involved in its own, separate territorial dispute with China. "We want to take this opportunity to develop our strategic partnership even further," Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told reporters Friday. "The South China Sea problem is one that directly affects the peace and stability of the region and is a matter of international interest, including to our country. We will continue to uphold the rule of law and to strengthen cooperation with the countries involved." Philippine and Chinese officials signed 13 pacts on areas including trade, investment and tourism. Trade Secretary Ramon Lopez told reporters in Beijing Friday that Duterte’s visit to China will yield $24 billion in government and business deals, including $15 billion in investments, and $9 billion worth of loan facilities. He said the Philippines will maximize the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank as a funding source for projects. ‘Pay the Piper’ Despite his remarks, Duterte still has yet to commit to anything that may permanently undermine the long-standing alliance between the U.S. and the Philippines. He hasn’t discarded any agreements, conceded that China has sovereignty in disputed waters or undermined the right of the U.S. to conduct military operations in the South China Sea. “The ‘yet’ is a very big ‘yet,’” said Malcolm Davis, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in Canberra. “At a certain point, if Duterte wants to reap the economic benefits from his visit to China he will need to pay the piper. He will need to do what he is saying, otherwise he won’t get anything from China.” 

[ :: 10-15-14 pm service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. For truly these are the end days and the end hours and darkness is all across the face of the earth and the enemy is fighting like mad because he knows that he has little time left. etc..

:: 10-18-16 Christian Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Helping Others Say 'No' to Assisted Suicide

Making the Case for Dignity at the End of Life

By John Stonestreet , Christian Post Guest Columnist October 18, 2016|12:40 pm

Whether you live in Colorado or not, you need to know what's at stake with doctor-assisted death and how to make the case for life. Yesterday on BreakPoint, I told you about the dangers of physician-assisted suicide laws: How they inevitably turn the "right to die" into the "duty to die," how these laws lead to the deaths of non-terminally ill patients, and how they threaten the lives of the disabled and the most vulnerable among us. We must be prepared to talk about these deadly laws with friends and neighbors and persuade them to oppose physician-assisted suicide. A great place to start is to focus on the definition of words, especially "dignity" and "compassion." These words are used to great effect by pro-euthanasia forces, but they've been redefined. "Dignity" went from meaning worthy of honor and respect to meaning little more than fully affirming one's lifestyle choices. But now let's look at the word "choice." In the Netherlands last spring, doctors euthanized a young sexual assault victim who suffered from depression and anorexia. Did she "choose" to die, or did her mental state prevent her from choosing to live? According to, in Oregon, only 5.3 percent of those who request suicide are referred for a psychiatric evaluation — "despite studies showing prevalence of depression in such patients." In fact, most patients in Oregon who were assisted in their suicide did not list physical pain as the primary reason. A far greater number listed depression instead. Thus it should alarm all of us that Colorado's Proposition 106 does not require psychiatric evaluation for patients requesting severe physical problems? Also in Oregon, nearly half of those who ended their life had no medical oversight. As reported by Colorado Christian University's Centennial Institute, one man had an "unanticipated and severe reaction" to his lethal prescription. He was revived at a Portland hospital only to die later at a nursing facility. "In another case," the Institute reports, "a victim who took the prescription awoke after 65 hours of unconsciousness." Colorado's Prop 106 "does not provide for a health-care professional of any kind to be on hand to ensure the drugs are administered competently." So much for compassion. And then there's the matter of potential abuse by insurance firms — something Prop 106 offers no protection from. The trailer for a Center for Bioethics and Culture's upcoming documentary on assisted suicide features an interview with a young California woman. Shortly after California legalized assisted suicide, her insurance company refused to cover the chemotherapy that would extend her life. They would, however, cover the lethal drugs that would kill her. If that doesn't send a chill up your spine, maybe this will. Prop 106, like in Oregon and California, prevents the cause of death on the death certificate from being listed as doctor assisted suicide. That's just dishonest. And, we should add, the number of non-assisted suicides in Oregon has increased since their legislation was put in place. That's one reason the Colorado Springs Gazette editorial board is opposing Prop 106 — my city is already facing a suicide epidemic among students and military. If suicide is legal, how can we possibly tell students that it's not the answer? Like Colorado, the District of Columbia is also considering assisted suicide legislation, and pro-suicide groups are at work in state houses across the nation. I urge you, whether you live in Colorado or not, to read through the resources we've gathered on the dangers of assisted suicide. Our Stop 106 Tool Kit offers talking points, videos, articles, even bulletin inserts for your church to use. All you have to do is go to Death by suicide is knocking at our door. We must answer and say NO! Orginally posted at

Read more at 

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. Keep your eyes; keep your eyes upon what is going on in the Mid-East, that is your tree, that is your tree, I have told you to watch Israel, that is your tree. etc.

:: 10-20-16 The Jerusalem Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

'Islamic Jihad plotted to blow up Israeli wedding hall, kidnap IDF soldier'

Four men indicted for planning attacks under the instruction of a senior Islamic Jihad official in Gaza. Security services announced on Thursday that they had thwarted an Islamic Jihad plot to attack a wedding hall in the South and to kidnap and kill a soldier for the purposes of bargaining with Israel. Mahmoud Yousef Hassin Abu Taha, a resident of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, was arrested last month while entering Israel through the Erez crossing, ostensibly for purposes of commerce. Abu Taha was enlisted by Wael Sufian Abu Taha, a senior Islamic Jihad official in Gaza, the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) said. He instructed Mahmoud to form a cell in order to carry out a terrorist attack in the South and to kidnap a soldier to be used in a prisoner swap, the agency said. The three men whom Mahmoud enlisted to help him with the attacks were also arrested. One of the suspects, Shafik Hamed Ahmed Abu Taha, 55, was illegally residing in Israel and was an employee of the wedding hall that the cell planned to attack. A second suspect, Ahmed Tisir Abdulrahman Abu Taha, 39, from Gaza, was also illegally residing in Israel. A third suspect, a 40-year-old from Deir el-Balah in central Gaza, was living in southern Israel legally after having gained residency through marriage by way of the “family reunification” law. The suspects had carried out reconnaissance at the wedding hall, devising a plan they hoped would kill as many people as possible, the Shin Bet said. At the same time, Mahmoud began planning the kidnapping, receiving thousands of shekels from Wael Abu Taha in order to rent an apartment in Israel to which he planned to lure a soldier. According to the Shin Bet, Mahmoud planned to kill the soldier, bury him and send his belongings back to Gaza to use as bargaining chips with Israel. “This grave affair yet again exhibits the efforts of terrorist elements in Gaza to carry out murderous terrorist attacks in Israel,” the agency said. The affair also shows the way in which terrorists take advantage of entry permits to Israel, given for humanitarian porpoises to improve the economy of Gaza, the Shin Bet said. In addition, the plot shows the danger posed by Palestinians illegally residing in Israel, the agency warned. In May, Islamic Jihad in Gaza released a propaganda video threatening IDF soldiers in response to the recent “Israeli escalation” in the Strip. The minute-and-a-half video, titled, “We Will Show You a Shadow of Fear,” presents four fighters in Islamic Jihad’s Quds Brigades conducting observation of IDF jeep stationed behind Israel’s border with the Gaza Strip and preparing to fired Sager rockets at the vehicle. Although the fighters did not attack the jeep, the video ends with a message translated to Hebrew: “We will show you a shadow of fear.” 

[ :: 8-17-14 pm service (third word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. you see all the things that are going on in the world, you see the darkness, you see the troubles, etc.

:: 10-17-16 Inquisitr :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

UFO expert max spiers dies after'vomiting black siquid,' sending warning text to mom warning of inpending death

By Patricia Ramirez 10-17-16

Thirty-nine-year-old Max Spiers was a well-known UFO expert, called a “conspiracy theorist” by many, and a man who had spent much of his life seeking answers to some of life’s darkest and most disturbing questions. Max passed away unexpectedly and seemingly without a clear cause in July while in Poland, and now, months after the UFO expert’s death, his mother is shedding some disturbing new light on his troubling case. According to Vanessa Bates, mother of Max Spiers, the official cause of her son’s death has been ruled to be “natural causes.” However, months after his bizarre and untimely passing, she is still awaiting the full postmortem investigation results, according to Fox 13 Now. Included among the results still not received by the mother of UFO expert Max Spiers are her son’s full toxicology results. The results of Max’s toxicology testing are of particular interest to his mother, because she says that just days prior to his death, she got a strange and disturbing text message from her UFO expert son. According to Vanessa Bates, her son actually warned her that his life might be in danger. Further, Max Spiers instructed his mom that he was in trouble, adding that she should investigate should anything happen to him. “Your boy’s in trouble. If anything happens to me, investigate.” In the wake of Max Spiers’ July death, that’s precisely what his mother has tried to do. However, as her inquiries into her son’s death go unanswered, Vanessa is starting to feel as though Max might have been onto something, and that his death could have been a targeted hit. Further, UFO expert Max Spiers’ mother is starting to wonder if there’s not a government conspiracy in the works with the goal of covering up the truth about what really happened to her son. Especially after she talked to Max Spiers’ friends regarding how her son died. Despite the fact that the UFO expert’s death was ruled to have been the result of “natural causes,” friends who saw him immediately before he passed away allege that Max Spiers was vomiting a “black liquid” before he was found dead on the couch of his shared Warsaw lodgings. “He was making a name for himself in the world of conspiracy theorists and had been invited to speak at a conference in Poland in July, He was staying with a woman who he had not known for long and she told me how she found him dead on the sofa. But I think Max had been digging in some dark places and I fear that somebody wanted him dead.”

Read more at 

:: 10-18-16 Natural News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

(NaturalNews) Our medical system is a "criminal enterprise" and the "vaccine establishment has become a protection racket," according to Jon Rappoport, in a recent opinion piece contributed to The Daily Sheeple. Rappoport accuses mainstream medicine of perpetuating the myth that vaccines are needed to create healthy children, and of suppressing evidence to the contrary. He wrote: "Those who insist on 50 or 60 shots of germs and toxic chemicals for every child, like it or not, are participating in an ongoing criminal enterprise. "Their vision is unnatural and perverse. "It turns out that stimulating the production of antibodies—which is the purpose of vaccines—is not the be-all and end-all of existence. It isn't the road to health. It isn't an automatic lease on life." Good health is not the result of medical procedure. In other words, Rappoport argues, healthy children are the product of many factors, and building a healthy immune system naturally is far better than relying on vaccines. History has shown that vaccines can actually trigger an epidemic - and this has been known for more than a century. From an 1898 book titled "A Century of Vaccination": "Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination)." Other sources have shown that the overall decrease in mortality in children from diseases like scarlet fever, diphtheria and measles since the 19th century has been due to improvements - in sanitation and particularly in diet - and not because of antibiotics and immunization, which were introduced later. Rappoport says that the "dud" epidemics that we are frightened with every few years are nothing more than the medical establishment's brainwashing efforts to convince us that we need constant medical care - and that there is no such thing as natural health. He points out the lack of research conducted on healthy children: "How many studies in peer reviewed journals examine large groups of healthy unvaccinated children?" he asks. In fact, there have been studies suggesting that children who grow up on farms, for example, have a higher resistance to disease simply because they were exposed to more germs at an early age, therefore strengthening their immune systems. This "hygiene hypothesis" offers support for the idea that building resistance naturally is better than trying to boost immunity through injecting dangerous toxins into children's bodies or protecting them from all contact with germs. Profit is the motivation Good health is not the result of medical techniques, but Big Pharma would cease to exist if natural health practices became the standard approach. That's why the vaccine industry, with the assistance of a sold-out government, is forcing vaccinations on children while doing its best to persecute and criminalize alternative health practitioners. That's why children are being injected with deadly poisons by force, while natural treatments such as cannabis are still illegal at the federal level. The medical establishment is built on lies - and those lies are killing people rather than curing them. Medical errors are the third-leading cause of death in the U.S. according to a recent Johns Hopkins University study, and that doesn't even take into account all the deaths caused - directly and indirectly - by standard procedures in doctor's offices, clinics and hospitals. Pharmaceutical-based medicine doesn't provide real cures, and usually - as in the case of vaccines and chemotherapy, for example - the supposed "cure" is worse than the disease itself. Big Pharma can't generate profits by actually making people healthy, so they are actually in the business of making people sick - and keeping them that way...

Learn more: 

[ :: 6-28-09 am service ( first word ) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. All these things are end-time signs, the economy, the loss of jobs, the government control. You are in a time that the world has never seen before and that time does not get better, etc..

:: 10-17-16 Zero Hedge :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Two Major Central Bank Insiders Just Gave a Clear Signal What's to Come

by Phoenix Capital... Oct 17, 2016 9:50 AM

Are you ready for inflation? On Friday, both the Bank of England AND the US Federal Reserve made clear signals that they WANT inflation. The Bank of England is prepared to tolerate higher inflation over the next few years and will keep interest rates low to support economic growth, according to Governor Mark Carney. Source: Telegraph In a further indication that the Federal Reserve will be inclined to let inflation run hot for a while, Chair Janet Yellen on Friday said it's useful to consider the benefits of a "high-pressure economy." Source: CNBC These two announcements hit the same day at roughly the same time. This was a coordinated verbal intervention by two major Central Bank heads. Folks, this is as close as you can possibly get to a Central Banker literally telling you what to buy. Central Banks want inflation and have even signaled that they’re willing to let it run ABOVE their targets. Let’s be clear… once inflation hits, it is almost impossible to control. It’s not as though the Fed can let the inflation genie out of the bottle and solve the issue in a month or two. BIG inflation is coming. Less than 99% of investors have figured this out. Those who do will make absolute fortunes with the right investment strategies. 

:: 10-17-16 The Daily Gaxaxy :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

China’s Manned Shenzhou XI Spaceship Blasted Off Today to Dock With Orbiting Science Lab --"A Step Towards Tracking Nuclear Submarines Via Gravitational Waves"

October 17, 2016

Once a nuclear submarine entered a deep, massive ocean such as the Pacific, it used to be believed that it would remain undetectable until it surfaced. But a space-based submarine detection platform could locate it with unparalled precision. The two-man Shenzhou XI spaceship that blasted off from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in Inner Mongolia on Monday morning will soon dock with the Tiangong-2 space laboratory, launched last month, which is carrying the world’s first space-based cold atom clock that will stay accurate for a billion years and be able to measure gravitational waves at the atomic level. The crew will spend 30 days in lab as part of bigger plan to build an international space station in six years. One task on their to-do list could be detecting and tracking nuclear submarines from space, using a technological breakthrough achieved by Chinese scientists. The ultra-accurate timepiece shares its core technology with cold atom interferometers, which can measure tiny changes in gravitational pull with unprecedented sensitivity, and one of the devices, to be built and put on the Chinese space station, could potentially be used to track nuclear submarines, some measuring more than 170 meters in length and displacing 48,000 cubic metres of water. When they cruise several hundred metres below the ocean’s surface they generate gravitational ripples that the detector could monitor and analyze to locate and follow the submarine. China could be the first nation to use cold atom interferometry to detect submarines, according to a researcher at the Beijing-based China Academy of Space Technology, which has initiated and designed most of China’s space projects. The cold atom interferometer would be part of a super-cold atom laboratory in the space station’s experimental module. Professor Tu Liangcheng, who has studied the precise measurement of gravity at Wuhan’s Huazhong University of Science and Technology, said the Chinese government had substantially increased funding for submarine detection technology in recent years. “There is a shift in the navy’s attitude to submarine warfare,” said Tu, who has been involved in military research projects. But funding for submarine-hunting technology, including gravitational measurement, had now increased significantly, Tu said. The change reflects China’s ambition to develop a “blue-water” navy able to protect its national interests along important maritime trade routes spanning the globe. Tu said the Chinese navy desperately wanted to be able to track foreign nuclear submarines, but it was 30 years behind the capabilities of the United States when it came to submarine-detection technology. “Now we have enough money, and China’s strength in this field of research in on par with the US and Europe,” Tu said. “But the pressure is high, there is high expectation of a quick breakthrough, and we are short of hands.” Besides the cold atom interferometer, China might consider other unconventional ways to detect submarines. Nuclear submarines’ fission reactors produce neutrinos, extremely small particles can pass through materials such as water and walls without effort, potentially exposing a submarine’s location. China has built some of the world’s largest and most advanced neutrino detectors, one at Shenzhen’s Daya Bay nuclear power plant and the other at a hydropower station in Sichuan, which at 2.4km below the earth’s surface is the world’s deepest underground laboratory. Cao Jun, the researcher who led the Daya Bay neutrino detection project, said that detecting the elusive particles from a source 50km away, using current technology, required a detector weighing 20,000 tons. But new neutrino detection technologies were emerging, which might satisfy the military’s need for a portable platform. A future technological breakthrough might enable scientists to develop neutrino detectors that could be placed on ships or space stations, Cao added. The US and Europe also launched cold atom interferometer projects, but they were either cancelled or delayed, mainly due to funding shortfalls, and some Western scientists have expressed interest in joining the Chinese project. China has told the European Space Agency that there could be a place for European astronauts on the Chinese space station, and some European astronauts have started learning Chinese to prepare for the trip. The Daily Galaxy via South China Morning Post and BBC Science 

[ :: 7-15-15 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. For I have warned you Russia is not your friend, I have warned you that China is not your friend, I have warned you that North Korea is not your friend and I have warned you that Iran is not your friend. etc.

:: 10-17-16 Daily Star :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Vladimir Putin’s superior weapons means US ‘total control’ in Syria 'IMPOSSIBLE'

AMERICAN forces don’t stand a chance against Vladimir Putin’s superior weapons in the war for “total control” of Syria, it has been claimed.

By Joshua Nevett / Published 17th October 2016

Both nations are at loggerheads over the bloody conflict in Syria, with relations reaching their lowest ebb since the Cold War. The war-ravaged country is increasingly seen as a key battle ground, with both superpowers picking sides with opposing forces. Russia has backed president Bashar Assad’s regime, while America has thrown its firepower behind the Syrian opposition in the bloody and brutal fight for power. With conflict appearing to reach deadlock, deputy prime minister of Turkey, Numan Kurtulmus, said the two warring nations are on a collision course for global war unless there is peace. But according to Russian newspaper Vzglyad, American “total control” of Syria is “impossible”. Vlad’s advanced missile defence systems would stop US Air Force airstrikes in their tracks, the paper claims. It said: “In Syria, America's greater engagement even in the form of a total control over [Syrian airspace] is impossible due to the presence of the Russian Aerospace Forces and air defense systems.” Evgeny Satanovsky, head of the Moscow-based Middle East Institute, told the newspaper US wouldn’t risk going into direct conflict with Russia. He said: “Even if the US Air Force launches airstrikes against Bashar al-Assads forces, it will use cruise missiles. “In this case, the airstrikes will become a test for our S-300 system capable of destroying this type of weapons.” Putin is refusing to boot ally Assad out of power and has been mobalising weapons in the area to protect him from US airstrikes. As tensions rise Russia has moved their nuclear bombers onto a Cold War-esque footing with patrols sweeping the Western-most regions of the US. 

[ :: 3-30-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.  for if you put the man in that I desire for you to put in, you will have good times until you go.  If not it shall be hell here on earth and you will think that you have been left behind, but that is not so.  

For I have told you before this that this would be the last President, that this would be the last President as you know a President, therefore listen, pay attention, for it is your life it will affect, but it doesn’t need to affect it in a bad sense it can affect it in a good sense.  You can be the victors, you can be the overcomers, but hear, hear what I, your Father God, has to say. 

For truly my people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge and I, your Father God, have said that if you lack anything ask and I, your Father God, will give it unto you.  And therefore, I am giving wisdom and knowledge when it is asked of me, but many times my people do not ask of me, but they make their own choice and their own decisions, and therefore, they have to pay the consequences and the price for those decisions.  Even as in the days of old when the children of Israel said let us, let us choose and they chose and the one that they chose was not the one that I chose and they ended up defeated because of that.  So you see my people when you follow after me and follow after my word and when you seek my wisdom, when you seek my counsel you are able to make the right decisions.  The decision that will bring you victory, the decision that will make you the overcomer, the decision that will help you and you see how the people decided in the past and they made the wrong decision and they paid the consequence because of that.  So seek my face, call upon my name, ask for wisdom, ask for knowledge and I will give unto you that wisdom, I will give unto you that knowledge, I will show you exactly who to vote for, I will show you what to do.  For truly if you follow after my ways and my wisdom you shall have victory, saith the Lord.

:: 10-18-16 Daily Mail :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Top Clinton aide offered FBI a funding 'quid pro quo' if agents helped him bury a Benghazi email – 'never to be seen again' – during probe of Hillary's secret server

A senior State Department official pressured the FBI to declassify one of Hillary Clinton's emails related to the Benghazi, Libya terror attack

FBI interview notes show Patrick Kennedy wanted to hide the email from public view using the Freedom of Information Act instead

He said he would use the FOIA loophole known as 'B9,' which covers geological information on oil and gas wells

The FBI's summary of his interview in Hillary Clinton's classified emails case shows he discussed a 'quid pro quo' to approve more FBI funding that would put agents in countries where they are currently not allowed to go

State Department denies the account; Donald Trump's campaign is putting on a full-court press to capitalize on the new wrinkle in a lengthy scandal

By David Martosko, Us Political Editor For Published: 12:15 EST, 17 October 2016 | Updated: 05:57 EST, 18 October 2016

A senior State Department official pressured the FBI to declassify one of Hillary Clinton's emails related to the Benghazi terror attack so he could use a loophole in the Freedom of Information Act to make sure it would never see the light of day, according to notes from an FBI interview released Monday. State Department Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, the FBI file shows, discussed the possibility of approving the FBI's request for funding 'to place more agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.' The FBI agent who interviewed him during the investigation into classified documents housed on Clinton's now-infamous secret email server called the proposal a 'quid pro quo.' The fallout from the bombshell revelation threatens to turn the presidential race upside down. The Obama administration rushed to deny the FBI's claim, and Donald Trump's campaign called it new evidence of a criminal conspiracy to hide the truth. BUSTED: State Department Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy, a newly released FBI file shows, discussed the possibility of approving the FBI's request for more personnel funding of the agency helped him get rid of one of Hillary Clinton's problematic emails 'NEVER TO BE SEEN AGAIN': Kennedy asked the FBI to help him the -related emails 'NEVER TO BE SEEN AGAIN': Kennedy asked the FBI to help him bury the Benghazi-related emails by declassifying it so he could use a loophole in the Freedom of Information Act to keep it from public view NO SALE: The FBI ultimately told Kennedy that it wouldn't help him declassify the email 'The classification of the email was not changed, and it remains classified today,' the State Department said in a statement. 'Although there was never a quid pro quo, these allegations were nonetheless referred to the appropriate officials for review.' Separately, State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner said the FBI's 'allegation is inaccurate and does not align with the facts.' FBI interviews are generally not recorded, leaving individual agents' notes as the only records from which final case reports are written. Classified documents are generally redacted – blacked out – in whole or in part when they are released to the media and the public. But portions that remain can still be damaging to public officials who author them. But authority to release documents that are unclassified or declassified rests with the cabinet agency that produced them, meaning the State Department would have had the power to invoke one of the FOIA laws' exemptions to ensure that the document would always stay hidden. 'Kennedy told [redacted] that the FBI's classification of the email in question caused problems for Kennedy and Kennedy wanted to classify the document as "B9",' The FBI report says. 'Kennedy further stated that the 'B9' classification would allow him to archive the document in the basement of DoS [Department of State] never to be seen again.' The 'B9' FOIA exemption known is a rarely invoked option that protects geological and geophysical data, information and maps. It's normally used to keep information about oil and gas wells secret. That could indicate that the email Kennedy sought to shield from the public had something to do with oil reserves in Libya. 'The e-mail of Kennedy's concern was classified by the FBI Counterterrorism Division (CTD),' the FBi report says, 'and was related to the attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.' Retired U.S. Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn blasted Clinton and her inner circle on Monday in a statement circulated by the Trump campaign. 'These FBI documents provide undeniable proof that Hillary Clinton colluded with the FBI, DOJ and State Department to cover up criminal activity at the highest levels,' Flynn said. 'Hillary Clinton has recklessly put our national security at extreme risk. We have men and women putting their lives on the line for this country. If any person had done a fraction of what she has done with our sensitive information they would be criminally charged and those in our military would be court-martialed.' Trump himself tweeted a breaking-news article accompanied by a single word: 'Unbelievable.'

Read more: 

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

:: 10-17-16 Biz Pac Review :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Undercover operatives expose Hillary’s dark illegal campaign secrets in explosive Project Veritas sting

October 17, 2016 | Michael Dorstewitz

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has been promoting the notion that media outlets are rigging the election against him. But it’s not just the media — the Democratic Party, the Clinton campaign apparatus and liberal super-PACs are all part of the problem — up to and including waging violence against Trump supporters. Conservative journalist and Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe released the first in a series of videos Monday depicting the dirty tricks the Clinton camp uses to win at any cost. The undercover footage reveals how the work is done while the campaign and the DNC are laundered out of the equation. In the words of one individual, described by O’Keefe as a key Clinton operative, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherfu**er.” Enter Scott Foval. Scott Foval is the National Field Director for a non-profit organization named Americans United for Change. In the video, he told an undercover investigator that they contract “directly with the DNC and the [Clinton] campaign both.” “I am contracted to him [Bob Creamer],” says Foval to an undercover reporter. “But I answer to the head of Special Events for the DNC and the head of special events and political for the campaign.” “The [Clinton] campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, The Foval Group goes and executes the shit…” continued Foval. “Democracy Partners is the tip of the spear on that stuff.” Enter Aaron Black. This character says his name is Aaron Black, but it is really Aaron Minter. “Yeah, and nobody is really supposed to know about me.” In the hidden camera video, Black shares credit with Creamer for the Chicago Trump rally which was shut down. “So the Chicago protest when they shut all that, that was us,” Black/Minter said. “It was more him [Bob Creamer] than me, but none of this is supposed to come back to us, because we want it coming from people, we don’t want it to come from the party. So if we do a protest and it’s a DNC protest, right away the press is going to say partisan. But if I’m in there coordinating with all the troops on the ground and sort of playing the field general but they are the ones talking to the cameras, then it’s actually people. But if we send out press advisories with DNC on them and Clinton campaign it just doesn’t have that same effect.”

Read more: 

:: 10-17-16 Watts Up With That :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Leaked Clinton campaign memo on ‘climate change’ shows it’s really about politics, not science

Guest Blogger / 1 day ago October 17, 2016 From Larry Kummer at the Fabius Maximus website

Memorandum: “Climate: A unifying theory to the case“,

Emailed from John Podesta to Chris Lehane, 28 January 2014.

This memo was emailed to Podesta (a senior White House official) from Lehane (partner in the strategic communications firm Fabiani & Lehane, dissolved in Nov 2015). We have it courtesy of Wikileaks — and whoever leaked it to them.

John Podesta was Chief of staff to Bill Clinton and Counselor to the President for Obama. He is Chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Chris Lehane – When an attorney in the White House Counsel’s office, he and his current business partner Mark Fabiani called themselves the “Masters of Disaster” for their work as a “rapid-response” team responding to the many scandals of the Clinton Administration. Lehane co-authored a book on damage control titled Masters of Disaster: The Ten Commandments of Damage Control. Jim Jordan, Kerry’s former campaign manager, called him ”a master of the political hand-to-hand” for his work as a political strategist.


“Thank you for asking us to share some ideas for a holistic approach to climate. Per your direction, the goal is to unify policy, politics, and communications to help the Administration best execute an informed plan over a multi-year time period. …this document is intended to provide some food for thought as the Administration refines its thinking on climate. …{it} addresses the four components that the Administration may want to consider as it seeks to lead on this issue.

Three-Year Framework. …

Right v. Wrong. Make the case that climate must be approached as a challenge of historical social change where progress will depend in part on successfully casting the issue in moral terms of who is right and who is wrong …

The Big Idea. …{It} could drive an Administration-wide approach to climate for the next three years. …

2014 Action Plan. …

“To achieve victory, we must treat climate change as an issue of historic importance that is worthy of a true political social movement to create change. This political social movement must be founded on moral principles with stark definitions of who is right and who is wrong, and it is important to outline the historically negative, irreversible implications if we were to not succeed. “By pursuing this as a political social movement, President Obama and his Administration will best be able to assure that his legacy includes his unprecedented leadership on climate that initiated the shifting of the country’s political tectonic plates to enable transformative climate change policy, before it was too late.

“…At the end of the day, given the powerful and entrenched interests that are opposed to climate change policy, one needs to have an organizing platform that defines the Administration as being morally on the right side of the issue and, equally important, defines the opposition as morally responsible for an issue that threatens the health and welfare of the American people. …

“Define the issue as between those who believe in the science, and therefore are taking steps to respond to the scientific findings, versus those who do not believe in the science. The power of this approach is that it puts the opposition in an indefensible box (the vast majority of people believe the science that climate is changing); it fits into what we call the Troglodyte Narrative(anti-women; anti-Latino; anti-gun safety; anti-common sense fiscal policy; and anti-science) that is raising basic trust issues for the Republican Party – especially with electorally decisive voter cohorts. You either believe in basic science or you are against basic science — in which case you fail a basic requirement for being capable of occupying public office. …

“The Winning Principles

“The Big Idea will need to be animated by three principles that the wedge political policies would connect with (think of FDR’s Four Freedoms or TR’s Three C’s). In the context of being informed by various campaigns (candidate and ballot initiative) in which climate was deployed as a decisively winning political issue, there are three issues that really stand out as wedge principles that could undergird the Big Idea (whatever the Big Idea may be). “Health/Safety. The opposition is engaged in practices or holding positions that are demonstrably imperiling the health and safety of our people. This ranges from macro issues like extreme weather to local issues like drinking water, air quality and rail safety to micro issues like children’s asthma. People care when the health and safety of their families are implicated. “Pocket Book. People care when climate impacts them economically. On the positive/aspirational front, this principle can be about whether new green jobs will be based here or overseas or how citizens are able to save money by paying less for energy.“Accountability/Responsibility. Follow the money. Who is accountable/responsible for the bad things that are happening, and how are they rigging the system to benefit from the bad things? …

“2014 Action Plan “…Establishment of an extreme weather SWAT team prepared to work together and engage when extreme weather happens — including response; local outreach; media; science information about historic nature of the event; and coordinating possible principal travel (POTUS, FLOTUS, VPOTUS, Cabinet).”

———————— End excerpt. ————————

Conclusions The most important thing about this memo, obvious almost three years later, is its complete failure. Few Americans consider the environment our most serious problem. It is a minor issue in the presidential election, seldom even mentioned. Climate change isn’t among our top 10 fears. The approach is pure politics, with little mention of science. For example, the SWAT teams {as we have seen} blame all “extreme” weather on climate change — ignoring that extreme weather is normal, occurring before any anthropogenic effects. The IPCC has repeatedly explained this, not just in their regular Assessment Reports but also in the 2012 report “Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation” (SREX). Worse, the binary framing (“the vast majority of people believe the science that climate is changing”) ignores the key issues of how much change is likely from anthropogenic sources — and when. That is the area of debate among climate scientists (there is as yet no consensus), and the necessary input to make public policy decisions. Describing climate change as a moral issue probably seemed like a sure winner to Lehane, especially with academia, journalists, and most NGOs as supporting players. But that prevented political compromise or any rational discussion of costs vs. benefits — both essential elements of successful public policy. It polarized the issue so that America has taken few measures to even prepare for the repeat of past weather (as Hurricane Matthew reminded us). Worse, Lehane does not mention what he relies upon as the authorities for science. The IPCC? NOAA? The alarmists that journalists love for their exciting soundbites? The climate scientists who write the IPCC’s Working Group I reports devote great effort to explaining their state of knowledge — and the large uncertainties in much of it. There is a large gap between the certainty of warming since the early 19th century plus the large role of anthropogenic forcings since 1950 — and the massive unknowns driving climate during the 21st century. All that is lost when the issue is defined in purely moral terms. So they lost. Clinton’s probable win (in March I predicted a landslide) Lehane and his fellow activists a second chance. Will they learn from their failures in the 28 years since James Hansen’s 1988 testimony to Congress ignited the movement? Or will they have sufficient political power to push through their agenda despite their weak political support and ineffective plans? There are better ways to handle major public policy issues. Climate change, our mad foreign wars, and our mishandling of so many other key challenges — these show our dysfunctional politics in action. We can do better. 

:: 10-18-16 The Common Sense Show :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Obama, Clinton & Russia’s 7 Pronged Attack Upon Amerika

By Dave Hodges

Since I first reported on leaked information that American military leaders were expecting an attack from seven different areas/sources, more information has come to light. First, elements of the following scenarios have been repetitively practiced at the Naval War College. In each instance, America loses, badly. Here is an update on newly acquired information which has added to our understanding of what is coming and our military leaders know it, while the Obama administration, and presumably a future Clinton administration will be the first American administration to surrender the country to a foreign power and you Democrats still want to vote for her? Why do you think the globalists are throwing everything behind her? They want a piece of the America pie. Well, Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie, the game is nearly over. Russia’s Attack When Russian led and backed forces attack the United States, the attack will come as the result of a seven-pronged strategy and it will involve multiple allies. What I have learned is that the Naval War College has practiced each one of these scenarios, multiple times, since I first reported on these scenarios. In every case, America becomes Amerika. In other words, surrender is the only option in order to avoid complete annihilation. Here are the seven different fronts from which Russia and her allies will launch an all out attack, which will make use of limited EMP attacks and tactical nuclear weapons. 1. The Alaskan Front will see the Russians attacking the lower 48 from Alaska after our most northern state is quickly overwhelmed. 2. The Central American Front will witness a conglomeration of 33 Central and South American states (i.e. CELAC) which will combine military strike forces, backed by Russian military supplies, weapons, technology and strategy. These forces will push north through Central America and will attack America from the south. 3. The Southeastern Front will witness an amphibious invasion following the successes of the first two fronts in which major American military assets will be deployed away from the Southeast to defend against the scissors attack from America’s Northwest and the Southwest. 4. In a secondary and delayed attack, Chinese forces embedded in American ports (e.g. Long Beach), who have entered the country in cargo ships, will be unleashed to attack key military bases in California. At the same time, Chinese soldiers, who are embedded in the Sierra Madras will join forces with the Latin American forces as they sweep northward through Mexico and will dramatically burst through the border and then fan out to the north, west and east. 5. The fifth part of this attack, the Fifth Column, will be carried out by terrorists who have already gained entrance into the United States. Key assassinations and critical infrastructure sabotage will be carried out by these forces. 6. Russian forces will come out of the Arctic and sweep down through Canada and will attack the U.S. through Minnesota. This will allow the Russian led forces to cut the United States in half at the Mississippi River. 7. The lights will be turned out in the East, and will be particularly centered on the Eastern seaboard.

Phase One In part one of this series, written years ago, I detailed the disabling of Alaskan defenses and the buildup of Russian troops on the border and in Alaska was presented along with the presence of Russian “Fifth Column” forces. It is difficult to imagine that when American soldiers pursue our self-created boogey man, ISIS, into Syria, that Russia will not immediately retaliate by attacking Alaska. My deep background sources have concluded the Battle for Alaska will be over in hours/days as Russian forces will cut through Alaska, with the help of pre-positioned assets, like a hot knife through butter. Within just a few short days, British Columbia, Washington, Montana and Oregon will be imperiled. Right now, there are efforts being made by the military that are not being supported by this administration and will not be supported by a Clinton administration. For example, on Saturday, October 15th, air space was cleared in Montana as part of a drill to prepare to launch ICBM’s to both Russia and China. These were the coordinates which correspond with the no-fly zones imposed on Saturday. The thinly veiled cover story was that these locations in Montana were launching rockets in support of a NASA space mission. This is a laughable excuse. Phase Two: The Invasion from Central and South America While we slept, Obama alienated all of our allies in Latin America. Former Secretary of State Clinton took actions that led to the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela. The President of Bolivia’s plane was forced to land by American jets, because they thought Ed Snowden was on board (please note: This was an act of war). And of course, we know the fate of Hugo Chavez stemming from his defiance to this administration’s imperialism and his “El Diablo” comments directed at several American leaders, most notably, George Bush. The 33 Central and South American nation organization known as CELAC are combining forces and will form the vanguard of an attacking Army moving north and entering the United States through Mexico. Nicaragua According to a March 2014 report by the Strategic Culture Foundation, a progressive, pro-Russian think tank, Nicaragua’s quoted former Sandista leader, Daniel Ortega, who reinstalled himself in 2007 as the Nicaraguan leader stated that “We are very grateful and very much appreciate the Russian people’s support of our country.” Ortega has accepted the arrival of two Russian strategic bombers and added that more will be on the way as Russia announced that Nicaragua has announced that it will accept routine Russian patrols in both its Caribbean and Pacific ports as well as participating in the joint training of military personnel. Russia and Nicaragua have moved in the direction of a strategic economic and military relationship. In October 2013, for example, Nicaragua and Russia signed a memorandum of international security cooperation. Russia’s Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev noted during his visit to Nicaragua that “Nicaragua is an important partner and friend of Russia in Latin America,” pointing to the coincidence of views of the two countries’ authorities on many issues.” Argentina Argentinean President, Cristina Fernández is determined to develop close economic relations with Russia as the left-wing liberal Argentinean leader has invited Russia to invest in fuel projects in an obvious attack upon the Petrodollar. Fernandez also cut a deal with Putin which previously supported Russia’s grab of Crimea in exchange for Russia’s support of Argentina’s quest to annex the Falkland Islands. If this is followed through with, this would be a direct act of war. Fernandez’s statement is most certainly a direct Russian slap in the face of our closest ally, England, and should be viewed as an attack upon NATO. Further, Cristina Fernández, added that the Crimean referendum was “one of the famous referendums of self-determination.” Equador, Venezuela and Bolivia Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa praised Russia as a “great nation”, while visiting Moscow in October of 2013. Putin was indeed praise-worthy because he promised to invest $1.5 billion into new domestic energy projects in Ecuador. Correa also stated that his country was planning on buying Russian military equipment. Russia has signed several billion dollars of contracts with Venezuela and supplies Bolivia, among other countries from the region with military weapons. The military package includes attack aircraft and helicopters.

Brazil Brazilian Defense Minister Celso Amorim, stated that “More than buying military equipment, what we are seeking with Russia is a strategic partnership based on the joint development of technology.” Amorim’s statement is consistent with the fact that Brazil, South America’s most populous nation, has announced that it is planning to purchase short-to-medium-range surface-to-air Pantsir S1 missile batteries and Igla-S shoulder-held missiles from Russia. Previously, Brazil has purchased 12 Mi-35 attack helicopters. Russia and Brazil have also signed an agreement for Brazil to acquire 36 attack aircraft. Amorim said Russia and Brazil would also look at working together on space technology and on defense against cyber attacks, an area that has become a Brazilian priority since disclosures that the NSA has spied on Brazilians, their president and the country’s largest oil company. If this means what I believe it means, with regard to the development of space technology, we are speaking about the possible intention of the Russian militarizing of near Earth orbit with space based weapons. Brazil is also one of the BRIC nations who is actively participating with Russia in the demise of the Petrodollar by purchasing oil for gold instead of the time-honored practice of the Petrodollar.

El Salvador and All of Latin America El Salvadorian President, Sanchez Ceren, has signed an agreement with Putin entitled “Federal Law On Ratification of the Agreement on the Foundations of Relations” which pledges economic and military cooperation. Ceren, is a self-declared Marxist-Leninist and is considered to be very-anti American. Leaders from the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) and Russia declared their intention to establish a means of continuous dialogue “to discuss and synchronize positions on international issues.” CELAC includes thirty-three countries in the Americas, but the United States and Canada are excluded. This is the breeding ground of a “Red Dawn Scenario”. Phase Three: The Southeastern Front: Cuba and the Rebirth of the Cuban Missile Crisis Pravda quotes Putin as stating that Russia had obtained the consent of the Cuban leadership to place “the latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles on the Island…” Recently, the Russians surprisingly docked a Russian spy ship in Havana. This is the Cuban Missile Crisis revisited! My sources are adamant that Cuba is being militarized by Russia as I write these words. Cuba, along with deployed Russian troops and troops “borrowed from fellow Latin American countries will form the center of the invading Army from the Southeast along with the support of the Russian Navy and Air Force.

Phase Four: Embedded Chinese Soldiers in West Coast Ports Since 1997, Chinese officials have bribed and bought off senior American government officials, particularly in the Clinton administration. Part of the bribes included the selling of Long Beach port to the Chinese along with the loss of nearly 18,000 American jobs. Multiple military sources around the country have quietly warned about the growing menace posed by the buildup of Chinese Communist forces in many of our California ports now controlled by the Chinese. The Bundy/BLM affair was also symbolic of this buildup. The solar energy deals that were put into place by Senator Harry Reid were done in conjunction with Chinese energy companies run by the Chinese military. All personnel manning these planned plants would be affiliated with the Chinese military. This includes the inland ports (e.g. Kansas City) which are controlled by the Chinese courtesy of the treasonous trade agreement we call NAFTA. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton gave tacit approval and participated in these actions which had their origins prior to her tenure as Secretary of State. Phase Five: The Fifth Column The Fifth Column, designed to sabotage critical infrastructure and carry out key assassinations of resistance figures in the media as well as uncooperative politicians, was mostly put into place last summer during the “immigration crisis” which was used as a cover to embed these forces inside of the U.S. Not Gangsters but Terrorists Armed with WMD’s There is incontrovertible evidence that criminal drug cartels, like Los Zetas, have not only used MS-13 gangsters as hit men and child sex traffickers, but so has the Juarez Cartel and the Barrio Azteca to enforce their will, but Los Zetas have also conducted training in parts of Central and South America, and have even allowed MS-13 gangsters to lead in operations as when “El Comandante Kilo” operated in San Fernando on behalf of Los Zetas. This training consists of two parts, military training and assassination (i.e. future Red List applications). In plain corporate language, the Mexican drug cartels are outsourcing paramilitary activities such as assassinations and terrorism. Paul Williams, a former FBI Consultant, wrote a book shortly after 9/11 and stated that reliable reports had reached United States officials that al Qaeda operatives were able to get at least two nuclear suitcase bombs into the United States. Williams went on to state that bin Laden had previously used his vast wealth, derived from control of Afghanistan’s poppy trade, to pay off high ranking MS-13 leaders. Williams further asserted that bin Laden paid as much as $50,ooo to smuggle sleeper agents into the United states. Williams is not alone in this belief as the author of Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America, Brigitte Gabriel, stated that there are terrorists coming through our southern border due to the cooperation and joint efforts of MS-13 and Hezbollah and they are intent on introducing a Hiroshima event on American soil! A very disturbing and recent report from the International Assessment and Strategy Center stated that MS-13 is moving away from handguns to the use of AK-47’s, along with grenades, rocket propelled grenade launchers, and light anti-tank weapons! The same think tank also reported that the MS-13 gang recently acquired multiple shoulder-fired SA-7 anti-aircraft missile launchers obtained from an open arms market in El Salvador from left over former civil war stockpiles. MS-13 is equipping its forces with these weapons as they can easily knockout helicopters and airplanes from the skies and these weapons can be obtained for a mere $15,000. This is chump change for a gang associated with the drug cartels. The same report went on to state that MS-13 has begun to smuggle drugs, weapons and human beings for the Zetas. MS-13 members are being trained at Zetas camps outside San Salvador and the training includes high level military training. Think TET offensive from the Viet Nam War. MS-13 is well-armed enough to take over cities by knocking out the headquarters of local police forces in a simultaneous series of attacks in which WMD’s are introduced on American soil. If you think this is far-fetched, please keep reading. Obama and Clinton began to actively ignore and, by neglect, gave approval to the following: Back in 2010, an internal memo was leaked from the Tucson Police Department which stated that Islamic terrorist groups are commencing operations in Mexico and forming alarming ties with the country’s brutal drug cartels. In turn, the drug cartels are now associated with Hezbollah. The memo also references a large weapons stockpile in Mexico as evidenced by the 2010 Tijuana arrest of Hezbollah militant Jameel Nasr, who was given the job of establishing a well-armed Hezbollah network in Mexico and South America. Nasr was apparently bringing this terror network north when he was captured. The memo also discussed the April 2009 arrest of Jamal Yousef in New York, which exposed a huge cache of assault rifles, hand grenades, explosives and anti-tank munitions. According to the report, the weapons were stored in Mexico, but only after being smuggled from Iraq by members of Hezbollah. The preceding references contained in the Tucson Police memo just answered that question. Further, as I reported last summer, the Border Patrol was not allowed to detain MS-13 gangsters despite how easy they are to identify because of their tattoos. This might be the best funded and supplied Fifth Column force in history. Two years ago, I reported, from two Border Patrol sources that these 5th column forces, now wreaking havoc in Minnesota, were given permission to enter in groups of 8-12 after being detained. Phase Six: Attack from the Northern Tundra For how many years have I reported on the Russian build up at the North Pole. Not only are there vast amounts on mineral wealth, occupying the North Pole is equivalent to playing King of the Hill. As Russia can attack in any direction. Most are aware that the Russians are militarizing the Arctic, presumably to secure vast amounts of mineral wealth. However, there is a also a tactical advantage behind the stationing of Russian troops at the North Pole. A move to split the U.S. would be necessary before a full invasion could be successful. The thinking of some military strategists would include the belief that a mid continent invasion is necessary to accomplish the goal of splitting up of America. I have learned in the past 6 months, that the Naval War College practiced this scenario and found there is no defense against this incursion.

Certainly, Russian forces in the southern regions of the Arctic could accomplish this goal. The plan entails sweeping southward through Canada and entering the U.S. at the Minnesota/Canadian border. If the invasion was initiated during the coldest part of the year, this would give the Russian Arctic forces advantages over American forces who would be less equipped than their American counterparts. Why do you think that the 5th column forces of MS-13 and other terrorists have been pre-positioned in Minnesota in large numbers? This phase gives some hint as to the time of year that we could see the commencement of the attack upon the United States. The winter would provide the best cover for invading Russian forces from both the Northwest and from due North. We are close to that right now. Phase six is designed to move south and southeast and secure the eastern bank of the Mississippi River and effectively cut the U.S. in half. Phase Seven: Turning Out the Lights on the Northeast In October/November of 2013, I expressed extreme outrage at the fact that President Obama was allowing our enemies, the Communist Chinese and the Russians, who had both threatened to nuke the U.S. several times over Syria, to participate in the GRID EX II drills in November of 2013. By doing so, we handed off the keys to our power grid to our enemies. It has been widely reported that the Russians are deploying and disseminating to its allies (e.g. North Korea), EMP weapons. It is the belief of many military strategists that the Chinese and Russians want to capture the Eastern seaboard intact. Taking down the grid would accomplish this goal. Further, in 2013, 360,000 foreign troops trained for urban warfare in the Northeast. Conclusion IF you do not think that treason does not abound with this Administration, then as yourself, with WW III on the near horizon, why aren’t our troops from Afghanistan being recalled and repositioned for the coming conflict. Presently, these troops will be cut off and will be on their own. With most of our combat troops being stationed in Afghanistan and more being sent to fight the CIA-created ISIS, who will defend the United States? Better yet, who, or what is minding the store at home? Further, my Congressman, Trent Franks, has desperately tried to get Obama to harden our critical infrastructure against an EMP attack and he has refused. The total cost is two billion dollars, the cost of one B-1 Bomber. Finally, why do you think the UWEX drills are ongoing. And what are the UWEX drills? They are drills in Texas in which a multinational occupying force is fighting a guerrilla war against American military units gone rogue. Welcome to Amerika. This article was proudly written by one of Clinton’s so-called “deplorables”. 

:: 10-18-16 World Net Daily :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Obama, Holder to lead post-Trump redistricting campaign

Ex-AG heads effort to challenge GOP's supremacy in state legislatures, U.S. House

Published: 1 day ago

(POLITICO) As Democrats aim to capitalize on this year’s Republican turmoil and start building back their own decimated bench, former Attorney General Eric Holder will chair a new umbrella group focused on redistricting reform—with the aim of taking on the gerrymandering that’s left the party behind in statehouses and made winning a House majority far more difficult. The new group, called the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, was developed in close consultation with the White House. President Barack Obama himself has now identified the group—which will coordinate campaign strategy, direct fundraising, organize ballot initiatives and put together legal challenges to state redistricting maps—as the main focus of his political activity once he leaves office. etc.

Read more at 

:: 10-6-16 Oath Keepers :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Obama’s ‘Diversity’ Mandates Put ‘Progressive’ Agenda over National Security

by David Codrea October 6, 2016

“President Obama released a Memorandum to promote diversity in the national security workforce,” National Security Advisor Susan Rice announced Wednesday. “This is why that makes us safer and stronger.” Rice’s ”why” is long on self-serving blather and short on “how.” She touches on “building an international order” with the UN, fighting Ebola in West Africa and pushing the transfer of wealth via “climate change” treaty (that has not been ratified by the Senate). But the talking point to accept and repeat without question is that “our diversity” is “what makes us truly exceptional.” If you’re an Opposite Day “progressive” dependent on “divide and conquer” tactics to rally favored demographics and marginalize others, what better way to do it than with a reverse “E Unum Pluribus” motto? And since platitudes and PR-speak do nothing in the way of proving a claim, Rice instead enlists fellow henchmen to tell us what great improvements can be made to providing for the common defense and insuring domestic tranquility by including alien cultures and “progressive values” into the national security mix. We can start with Rice’s qualifications, aside from a career at the diversity trough starting in the Clinton administration. Perhaps there is no more telling testament to either her competence or her willingness to parrot a lie for political CYA than her embarrassing public insistence that the Benghazi attacks were attributable to that stupid You Tube Mohammed video. Rice is bolstered by Secretary of defense Ash Carter, whose primary focus appears to be “transgendering” the military. They’re joined by Secretary of State John Kerry of publicly throwing away somebody’s service ribbons fame. Adding their voices to the diversity chorus: Attorney General Loretta “turn a blind eye to Hillary’s crimes” Lynch; Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (who gave false testimony to Congress about spying on Americans); and CIA Director John Brennan, who has admitted to voting for a Communist and who may or may not have converted to Islam. Is everybody feeling the strength of our diversity yet? The Rice/White House announcement intentionally dovetails with the U.S. Department of Justice Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s just-released “Advancing Diversity in Law Enforcement” report. has a good summary of the DOJ report I’d encourage you to read and share. “[I]ncreased diversity within law enforcement agencies – defined not only in terms of race and gender, but also other characteristics including religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, language ability, background, and experience – serves as a critically important tool to build trust with communities,” we are assured. But there’s a problem with the way we do things now. “Many of the selection devices used to screen applicants, including physical ability and cognitive tests examinations and background checks, have been shown to have an unwarranted disproportionate impact on underrepresented populations,” we’re told. Physical and mental standards, and disqualifiers based on past criminal convictions, are just not conducive to promoting that diversity we need to make us all safer. “Residency and citizenship requirements may limit certain underrepresented communities’ representation in law enforcement agencies,” the DOJ report cautions. “[T]his requirement may prevent a considerable number of racial and ethnic minorities – many of whom have valuable foreign language skills – from being hired by law enforcement agencies.” Hey, who needs UN blue helmets when you can give a criminal pathway to citizenship foreigner who can’t pass qualification tests – but will follow orders – a badge? Now that would be diverse! And it ought to fit in neatly with the globalist Strong Cities Network agenda. And if we really want to be “progressive,” we’ll need to let our new diversity hires choose their gender neutral pronouns (and ticket citizens for not getting them right), take a knee during the national anthem, and refuse to take an oath to a Constitution written by patriarchal slaveholders. As a matter of fact, forget Article VI: Asking them to do that last bit is not only a microagression, it’s an act of racist oppression and workplace harassment that should be cause for an ACLU lawsuit. Right? This is all part of that “fundamental transformation of America” Obama has been promising us/threatening us with since Day One of his administration. “Diversity” as a source of strength, or at least of power, is something Hillary intends to amp up with a vengeance once she slithers her way into the White House. Domestic enemies have no interest in “the security of a free State” except to undermine it. 

[ :: 3-30-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.  for if you put the man in that I desire for you to put in, you will have good times until you go.  If not it shall be hell here on earth and you will think that you have been left behind, but that is not so.  

For I have told you before this that this would be the last President, that this would be the last President as you know a President, therefore listen, pay attention, for it is your life it will affect, but it doesn’t need to affect it in a bad sense it can affect it in a good sense.  You can be the victors, you can be the overcomers, but hear, hear what I, your Father God, has to say. 

For truly my people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge and I, your Father God, have said that if you lack anything ask and I, your Father God, will give it unto you.  And therefore, I am giving wisdom and knowledge when it is asked of me, but many times my people do not ask of me, but they make their own choice and their own decisions, and therefore, they have to pay the consequences and the price for those decisions.  Even as in the days of old when the children of Israel said let us, let us choose and they chose and the one that they chose was not the one that I chose and they ended up defeated because of that.  So you see my people when you follow after me and follow after my word and when you seek my wisdom, when you seek my counsel you are able to make the right decisions.  The decision that will bring you victory, the decision that will make you the overcomer, the decision that will help you and you see how the people decided in the past and they made the wrong decision and they paid the consequence because of that.  So seek my face, call upon my name, ask for wisdom, ask for knowledge and I will give unto you that wisdom, I will give unto you that knowledge, I will show you exactly who to vote for, I will show you what to do.  For truly if you follow after my ways and my wisdom you shall have victory, saith the Lord.

:: 10-17-16 Breitbart :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Trump Proposes Government Ethics Reforms: ‘It Is Time to Drain the Swamp in Washington, D.C.’

by Alex Swoyer17 Oct 2016Washington, DC

Donald Trump proposed a package of ethics reforms at his campaign rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin on Monday night after he criticized his opponent Hillary Clinton and the investigation into her use of a private email server. “If we let the Clinton Cartel run this government, history will record that 2017 was the year America lost its independence. We will not let that happen,” the Republican nominee stated to more than 2,000 supporters at the campaign rally. “It is time to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C. That is why I am proposing a package of ethics reforms to make our government honest once again.” Trump detailed five ethics reform proposals that he would issue if elected president: I am going to re-institute a 5-year ban on all executive branch officials lobbying the government for 5 years after they leave government service. I am going to ask Congress to pass this ban into law so that it cannot be lifted by executive order. I am going to ask Congress to institute its own 5-year ban on lobbying by former members of Congress and their staffs. I am going to expand the definition of lobbyist so we close all the loopholes that former government officials use by labeling themselves consultants and advisors when we all know they are lobbyists. I am going to issue a lifetime ban against senior executive branch officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government. I am going to ask Congress to pass a campaign finance reform that prevents registered foreign lobbyists from raising money in American elections. Trump also called for Under-Secretary of State Patrick Kennedy to resign after news broke that Kennedy was involved in a quid pro quo conversation regarding the classification of Clinton’s emails. 

:: 10-17-16 Sputnik :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Murder of Donetsk Militia Commander Threatens to Reignite Ukraine's Civil War

AFP 2016/ VASILY MAXIMOV Europe 16:38 17.10.2016(updated 16:44 17.10.2016)

On Sunday night, Donetsk People's Republic militia commander Arseny Pavlov, aka Motorola, was killed in an explosion of an elevator in a Donetsk high-rise. DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko called the attack a declaration of war by Kiev. Analysts warn that the brazen attack could lead to a resumption of hostilities. According to local media, Pavlov, the commander of the Sparta Battalion special forces unit, was killed after a remotely-detonated improvised explosive device blew up in an elevator shaft in the apartment building where he and his family lived. DPR authorities suspect Ukrainian saboteurs to be behind the attack. Pavlov was threatened directly by President Petro Poroshenko just last month. In early September, in a ceremony dedicated to Ukrainian servicemen killed in eastern Ukraine, including Igor Branovitsky, who died in 2014 amid brutal fighting for Donetsk Airport, Poroshenko claimed that Pavlov had murdered the soldier in cold blood in captivity, and vowed that the DPR commander would "answer for the death of a Ukrainian hero." There have been multiple attempts on Pavlov's life over the course of the two-and-a-half year civil war in eastern Ukraine, which began in April 2014 after Kiev moved troops to the regions of Donetsk and Lugansk to put down uprisings against new authorities in Kiev. The commander had survived two assassination attempts in just the last five months, and was twice wounded in fighting with Ukrainian forces in battles in 2014 and 2015. In other words, Pavlov had a price on his head long before Poroshenko decided to try to implicate him in the deaths of Ukrainian POWs. Pavlov was born in 1983 in Ukhta, northern Russia. He served two tours in the Russian anti-terrorist operation in Chechnya, where he got his nickname 'Motorola' for his work as a signals operator. Before arriving in Ukraine, he lived in neighboring Rostov-on-Don. In 2014, observing the coup d'état in Kiev, and hearing the threats made by nationalists against Ukraine's Russian minority, Pavlov came to eastern Ukraine, eventually joining the self-proclaimed Donetsk republic's militia. He and his unit were given numerous medals for the defense of DPR territory against Ukrainian forces. Pavlov held the title 'Hero of the DPR'.

Read more: 

:: 10-18-16 Radio Free Europe :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

EU Commissioner Warns Of Militant Influx After Mosul Battle

The European Union's security commissioner has warned that the bloc should be prepared for an influx of militants if the Islamic State (IS) group is driven out of the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. Even a small number of militants would pose "a serious threat that we must prepare ourselves for," said Julian King in an interview with Germany's Die Welt newspaper published on October 18. On October 17, more than 30,000 Iraqi security personnel, Kurdish fighters, Sunni Arab tribesmen, and Shi'ite paramilitary forces -- backed by U.S.-led coalition warplanes -- began their advance on Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city. The UN has warned that as many as 1 million people may be forced from their homes during the campaign, which is expected to continue for weeks, possibly longer. King, a Briton, also said that some 2,500 IS fighters from what he called the combat areas were from EU member states. In Berlin, German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere said efforts to combat the IS group in Iraq and Syria won't increase the risk of attacks at home, noting that "the threat is already high." De Maiziere said authorities expect IS fighters from Europe to try to return as the group faces military setbacks, but that authorities are working to minimize security threats.

Based on reporting by AFP, the BBC, and AP 

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. Keep your eyes; keep your eyes upon what is going on in the Mid-East, that is your tree, that is your tree, I have told you to watch Israel, that is your tree. etc.

:: 10-17-16 Times of Israel :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Hamas test-fires long-range rocket into sea off Gaza

Terror group often conducts trial launches to improve range, accuracy; latest comes less than 2 weeks after twin strikes on southern Israel

By Times of Israel staff October 17, 2016, 10:54 am

The Palestinian terror group Hamas fired at least one long-range missile into the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip on Monday morning, in what appeared to be a weapons test. The booms of detonations could be heard in communities in southern Israel that border the Hamas-ruled territory, Channel 2 reported. The jihadist group regularly fires rockets as it works to improve its rocket range and accuracy, a little over two years after it last fought Israel. In June, it test-fired dozens of short-range rockets inside Gaza, with Israeli sources estimating that at least 30 projectiles were launched. Monday’s test comes some 10 days after two projectile strikes in two days from Gaza on nearby Israeli population centers. The first attack — in which a rocket hit a street in the city of Sderot — caused some damage to nearby homes and cars, but no injuries. Three people were hospitalized for anxiety following the strike. The following day, a mortar shell fired from the Strip landed in an open area in the southern Eshkol region. There were no injuries or damage reported from the shell, according to the IDF. The army responded with a massive bombing campaign in the Gaza Strip, targeting strategic Hamas positions in the north and south of the enclave. While Hamas initially warned that it would not “sit idly by” if Israel continued airstrikes on its installations, the group reportedly sent a message to Israel calling for calm and saying the terrorist group was not interested in a further escalation of tensions. Israel says it holds Hamas responsible for any attacks emanating from Gaza and routinely responds to such launches with strikes against Hamas targets. 

:: 10-15-16 Arutz Sheva 7 :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Officer wounded in attack near Jerusalem

Squad of Border Police officers attacked by knife-wielding terrorist outside of Har Adar, near Jerusalem. A Border Police officer was stabbed Saturday morning by an Arab terrorist brandishing a knife outside of the Arab town of Beit Surik and the Jewish community of Har Adar, northwest of Jerusalem. The officer was lightly injured after being stabbed in the shoulder. The attacker fled after wounding the officer. According to an initial investigation, the attack occurred while the squad was preparing to open up a road next to the security barrier. The terrorist lay in wait to ambush the squad, taking cover amid the surrounding brush. As the officers passed on their way back, he attacked them, managing to stab one before fleeing towards Beit Surik. The wounded officer was treated on the spot by fellow officers before being transported to the nearby town of Har Adar, and from there evacuated to Hadassah Ein Karem Hospital in Jerusalem. 

[ :: 3-30-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.  for if you put the man in that I desire for you to put in, you will have good times until you go.  If not it shall be hell here on earth and you will think that you have been left behind, but that is not so.  

For I have told you before this that this would be the last President, that this would be the last President as you know a President, therefore listen, pay attention, for it is your life it will affect, but it doesn’t need to affect it in a bad sense it can affect it in a good sense.  You can be the victors, you can be the overcomers, but hear, hear what I, your Father God, has to say. 

For truly my people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge and I, your Father God, have said that if you lack anything ask and I, your Father God, will give it unto you.  And therefore, I am giving wisdom and knowledge when it is asked of me, but many times my people do not ask of me, but they make their own choice and their own decisions, and therefore, they have to pay the consequences and the price for those decisions.  Even as in the days of old when the children of Israel said let us, let us choose and they chose and the one that they chose was not the one that I chose and they ended up defeated because of that.  So you see my people when you follow after me and follow after my word and when you seek my wisdom, when you seek my counsel you are able to make the right decisions.  The decision that will bring you victory, the decision that will make you the overcomer, the decision that will help you and you see how the people decided in the past and they made the wrong decision and they paid the consequence because of that.  So seek my face, call upon my name, ask for wisdom, ask for knowledge and I will give unto you that wisdom, I will give unto you that knowledge, I will show you exactly who to vote for, I will show you what to do.  For truly if you follow after my ways and my wisdom you shall have victory, saith the Lord.

:: 10-18-16 The Common Sense Show :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

By Dave Hodges

The One Thing Trump MUST Say to Win the Next Debate and the Presidency

The most recent CNN poll states that Clinton is leading by 8 points. That means that Trump is leading by 10 points. However, that it is not enough to ensure victory because of the blatant election fraud being committed by the Democrats: It is known that 7 million Democrats are registered to vote in at least 2 adjacent states. Deblasio has bragged that buses will transport out “newest guests” in vans and buses to vote in New York City. Dead Democrats are voting in at least 7 states already with absentee paper ballots. It is happening in my state of Arizona. DHS and the UN say they are monitoring election sites to prevent voting interference by the Russians. What? Do these people think that we are stupid enough to believe this? By the way, if you see a UN election monitor at your poll, please let them forcefully know how much you appreciate their commitment to ideals like genocide and illegal wealth transfer and outright theft of the people’s money in places like Haiti. The colonists tarred and feathered the tax collectors following the passage of the Stamp Act by parliament. I estimate that Donald must offset the voter fraud by winning with at least a 20% margin. The fake CNN and other establishment polls are conditioning you to the fact Clinton will win. This is designed to cover-up the massive voter fraud. If Trump Wants to Win This Election He Must Say These Three Things The election will come down to two things: (1) The Third and final debate and (2) The work that you and I will do in the next 3 weeks to keep Hillary from the White House. I have made it no secret that I have been very frustrated with Trump’s under-performance in the debates. He clearly won debate number two, but he failed to deliver a knockout punch to Clinton. Here is the sure-fire knockout punch. The Number One Issue: Clinton’s Treason Trump states in hi sopening statement: “Mrs. Clinton is this generation’s Ethel Rosenberg”. She sold nuclear grade material to the Russian through the Clinton Foundation’s front company, Uranium One. Mrs. Clinton, don’t deny it my sweet princess, it was your mouthpiece, the New York Times that reported this. Why would they lie, Mrs. Clinton? We are going to war, Mrs. Clinton and Americans are going to die because she sold nuclear grade material to the Russians. This money was laundered into the Clinton Foundation to be used to run for President. Mrs. Clinton, is this generation’s Ethel Rosenberg and you know what we did with her. We executed her and her treasonous husband, Julius. I am calling for Clinton to resign from this race and face justice. Trump turns to Clinton and says, “Yes, that is right, Hillary Clinton, you are the Ethel Rosenberg of your generation. You sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State and this is what both the Bundy and the Hammond Ranch Affair is all about. In fact, when I am President, I will pardon the Bundy’s and all of their colleagues and put you in prison to take their place! Now, of course you will deny this Mrs. Clinton. So who is lying, you or your mouthpiece, the New York Times? The press has a copy of the proof. My two minutes are up. End of statement To Be Released After the Debate to the Media: Statement to the Press: A former key member of the Obama administration and current Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has proven herself to be the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. You may recall your U.S. history as Ethel Rosenberg sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. In an act every bit as egregious as Ethel Rosenberg’s treason, Hillary Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State. Ironically, the original source on this treasonous act committed by Clinton was none other than the liberal rag we call the New York Times. The proof is undeniable that Hillary Clinton committed the treasonous act of selling uranium to the Russians while Secretary of State, as reported in the New York Times. The Russian blood money, as reported, is being held in an offshore account and is being used to fund her run for the Presidency. From the New York Times…. “A Uranium One sign that points to a 35,000 acre ranch by John Christensen, near the town of Gillette, Wyoming. Uranium One has the mining rights Mr. Christensen’s property.” This is proof of more BLM chicanery which will involve multiple BLM ranches. The New York Times further asserted that members of the Canadian mining industry, who have supported Clinton’s campaign, financed and sold off to the Russians a company known as Uranium One. Uranium One is directly responsible for transferring uranium from BLM land to the Russians through an off-shore holding company. Again, according to the NY Times, the Russians, through three separate transactions, acquired Uranium One, while paying off the Clintons and their Canadian partners from 2009-2013. The business deal also involved paying Bill Clinton $500,000 dollars for a speech on energy which was delivered in Moscow. END OF STATEMENT- END OF DEBATE- END OF HILLARY WE ARE WAITING, DONALD, TO SAY WHAT MUST BE SAID 

:: 10-18-16 Anti Media :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

New FBI Docs Reveal ‘Shadow Government’ Protected Hillary in Email Investigation

(ANTIMEDIA) While serving as Secretary of State under President Barack Obama, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton “blatantly” disregarded protocol, an issue that prompted an official to say that there was a “stark difference” between Clinton’s “obedience to security and diplomatic protocols” and the behavior of former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. The details come from a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) report released Monday. “This frequently resulted in complaints by ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol,” the summary reads. According to the FBI docs, the interviewee also added that “Clinton’s [use of a private email server was] well known throughout Diplomatic Security, and [breaches] were ‘abundant.’” The 100-page document contains interview summaries conducted by the FBI along with notes from its agents, which may offer the public a glimpse into the government’s official Clinton email investigation. The last 100-page release is the fourth installment of documents related to the Clinton email probe recently released by the FBI. The most recent release also contains allegations regarding a “quid pro quo” request from Patrick F. Kennedy, the undersecretary of state for management, among other claims. According to the FBI document, Kennedy “pressured FBI agents to change the classification on sensitive documents found on Hillary Clinton’s private email server” in “exchange for a ‘quid pro quo.’” Promptly after the document’s release, both the FBI and State Department denied such an arrangement took place — but that didn’t stop the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform from demanding more information on the exchange. In a letter addressed to Secretary of State John Kerry, the committee chair, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-CA), along with Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the chair of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, claimed to have reasons to believe Kennedy “inappropriately influenced the review of Secretary Clinton’s emails.” Despite the uproar the release sparked due to the bribery allegations, some news organizations took particular interest in the FBI document’s mention of “the Shadow Government,” a group of “very high-ranking STATE officials that some referred to as ‘The 7th Floor Group’ or ‘The Shadow Government.’” According to the FBI probe, “[t]his group met every Wednesday afternoon to discuss the FOIA process, Congressional records, and everything CLINTON-related to FOIA/Congressional inquiries.” In the letter to Secretary Kerry, Chaffetz and Nunes added that members of the Shadow Government included Kennedy and “several former attorneys from the law firm that has represented [Clinton] in this investigation, Williams & Connolly LLP,” suggesting Clinton’s legal representatives may have influenced the FBI much like Kennedy attempted to. Both congressmen are now urging Kerry to remove Kennedy from his post until further investigation can show proof the undersecretary did not have anything to do with the FBI’s decision not to prosecute Clinton. In the FBI’s summary, the Shadow Government is said to have urged the FBI to drop the investigation documents all at once “for coordination purposes.” This information comes from an unidentified person, the FBI documents claim. Usually, the bureau releases investigation documents on a rolling basis, releasing batches of investigation documents in its official vault. The group of very high-ranking State officials allegedly urged officials to do the opposite, but they did not get their way. Regardless, after announcing the investigation had been concluded, FBI Director James Comey decided not to prosecute former Secretary of State Clinton, claiming the move was apolitical. “I want the American people to know we really did this the right way,” Comey said in July. “You can disagree with us, but you cannot fairly say we did it in any kind of political way. We don’t carry water for anybody. We were trying to do what the right thing is.” At the time, Comey explained he arrived at that particular decision because “no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case, no reasonable prosecutor would bring the second case in 100 years focused on ‘gross negligence.’” Nevertheless, the FBI’s own notes seem to argue that Clinton and her State Department minions may have been involved in criminal acts other than gross negligence. 

:: 10-17-16 True Pundit :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Hillary Clinton Promised Obama & Attorney General Lynch U.S. Supreme Court Justice Posts For Life

Posted on October 17, 2016 by admin

Under a Hillary Clinton regime, President Barack Obama will replace deceased Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and Attorney General Loretta Lynch will replace soon-to-retire Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States, according to White House and Justice Department insiders. And you thought you’d almost seen the last of President Obama on the national stage. Think again. According to White House sources, Obama has confided to key insiders that the reason he chose to reside in Washington. D.C. after his second term, and not Hawaii as originally planned, is because Clinton has promised him the now open chair on the Supreme Court. Now it is starting to make sense why Obama never pushed back on Merrick Garland’s nomination rebuke by the GOP-controlled Senate. Obama nominated Garland to the Supreme Court after the mysterious death of Justice Scalia in early 2016. The Senate never even considered the nomination. The bigger surprise here is Lynch, who by many accounts has posted an even worse public record trampling the Constitution than Obama since she arrived in Washington D.C. Nonetheless, Lynch is more than just a strong rumor to replace Justice Ginsburg, according to Justice Department sources who spoke to True Pundit. Clinton has promised the job to Lynch, sources said, but the attorney general is still considering the offer. Will Lynch decline? Doubtful, Justice Department sources said. Obama and Lynch on the Supreme Court. For life. Talk about a stacked court. The question now is can either pass a Senate confirmation. Whoops, we forgot Republicans have no spine so passing confirmation hearings would likely prove a breeze, regardless of Obama and Lynch’s key and corrupt roles in keeping Clinton free from criminal charges in her blatant mishandling of government emails, classified and top secret intelligence. And then there’s the Clinton Foundation’s pay to-play scheme and cover up which would likely ensnare the FBI and Justice Department as certain accomplices. Lynch was promised the Supreme Court post in June or July, sources said, which would put the job offer right at the exact time the FBI concluded not to refer Clinton’s case to the Justice Department for criminal indictment. Coincidence? When can we expect to see FBI Director James Comey in a Supreme Court robe? Of course if Donald Trump wins the election in November, Clinton, Obama, Lynch and Comey might be retaining criminal defense attorneys instead of presiding over them. 

[ :: 10-17-10 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. truly darkness, darkness is growing darker and darker and darker, war is being prepared, war is being made ready. 

:: 10-13-16 Express :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Cold War 2015: Russia 'FURIOUS' after RAF pilots cleared to shoot down Moscow warplanes

VLADIMIR Putin's military officials are reportedly furious with Britain after RAF pilots were authorised to shoot down Moscow warplanes.

By Jake Burman PUBLISHED: 06:52, Tue, Oct 13, 2015 | UPDATED: 08:56, Tue, Oct 13, 2015

Outraged Russian officials asked UK ministers "to provide an official explanation" of reports that RAF Tornados operating over Iraq have been fitted with heat-seeking missiles designed for arial combat. The Russian ambassador in London, Alexander Yakovenko, said he had "urgently requested explanations" of the reports from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. He said: "These reports are worrying, as they refer to senior cabinet members. We have urgently requested explanations from the Foreign and Commonwealth office. "The very premise of a potential conflict of UK and Russian combat aircraft over Iraq is incomprehensible." It emerged last night that RAF fighter pilots have been granted permission to shoot down Russian jets if they come under attack while completing missions over Iraq. Pilots were given the shocking order as UK ministers wanted Russia is making the situation in the Middle East "much more dangerous". RAF jets will be armed with advanced short range air-to-air missiles and British and Nato pilots have been told to fight for their lives if they are fired upon by Vladimir Putin’s air force. Senior defence sources said it is likely British fighter jets will become embroiled in a deadly air battle with Russian aircraft sooner rather than later. A source said: "We need to protect our pilots but at the same time we’re taking a step closer to war. It will only take one plane to be shot down in an air-to-air battle and the whole landscape will change." RAF pilots have reportedly been told to avoid contact with Russian jets but have been warned to be prepared to fight back if fired upon. A second source said: “No one knows what the Russians will do next. We don’t know how they will respond if they come into contact with a Western jet. "When planes are flying at supersonic speeds the airspace gets crowded very quickly. There could be a collision or a Russian pilot might be mistakenly shot down." Tensions between Russia and Western forces have increased since Putin announced an assault on rebels who have been trying to overthrow Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. The US, Britain, France and others have accused Moscow of launching airstrikes against non-ISIS targets in Syria. Allied forces also condemned an incursion by Russian warplanes into Turkish airspace. 

:: 10-13-16 Intellihub :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

President Barack Obama admits he is “speeding up training of ISIL [ISIS] forces”

Obama caught red handed funding radical Islamic terrorism, in his own words

By Shepard Ambellas - October 13, 2016

(INTELLIHUB) — This ought to make every single American mad as hell. In fact it is worse than you could ever imagine. It appears that President Barack Obama is not even worse than you could ever imagine. It appears that President Barack Obama is not even hiding the fact that he has given authority to speed up the training of ISIL (ISIS), a known terrorist group responsible for terrorism and mass murder worldwide. That’s right, your very own Commander-In-Chief can be heard in a video saying, “[…] the Fall of Ramadi has galvanized the Iraqi government, so with the additional steps I ordered last month we are speeding up training of ISIL [ISIS] forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Provence.” This proves that Barack Obama and others inside the U.S. Government should likely be tried for treason after funding radical Islamic terrorism. 

[ :: 5-15-11 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::]

etc. But it is not an exciting time for the lukewarm or the ungodly, it shall be a terrible time, a time of a dictator, a dictator government that dictates, that takes away your rights, that takes away your freedoms, that takes away the things that you have, the things that you never expected that they would control, they shall control. Oh, what an hour is just ahead. etc..

:: 10-12-16 The Rutherford Institute :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The Imperial President’s Toolbox of Terror: A Dictatorship Waiting to Happen

By John W. Whitehead October 12, 2016

“When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal.”—Richard Nixon Presidents don’t give up power. Executive orders don’t expire at the end of each presidential term. And every successive occupant of the Oval Office since George Washington, who issued the first executive order, has expanded the reach and power of the presidency. The Constitution invests the President with very specific, limited powers: to serve as Commander in Chief of the military, grant pardons, make treaties (with the approval of Congress), appoint ambassadors and federal judges (again with Congress’ blessing), and veto legislation. In recent years, however, American presidents have anointed themselves with the power to wage war, unilaterally kill Americans, torture prisoners, strip citizens of their rights, arrest and detain citizens indefinitely, carry out warrantless spying on Americans, and erect their own secretive, shadow government. These are the powers that will be inherited by the next heir to the throne, and it won’t make a difference whether it’s a President Trump or a President Clinton occupying the Oval Office. The powers amassed by each successive president through the negligence of Congress and the courts—powers which add up to a toolbox of terror for an imperial ruler—empower whomever occupies the Oval Office to act as a dictator, above the law and beyond any real accountability. Consider some of the presidential powers—which have been acquired through the use of executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements and can be activated by any sitting president—that have allowed past presidents to operate above the law and beyond the reach of the Constitution. The power to kill. As the New York Times concluded, “President Obama, who came to office promising transparency and adherence to the rule of law, has become the first president to claim the legal authority to order an American citizen killed without judicial involvement, real oversight or public accountability.” Obama’s kill lists—signature drone strikes handpicked by the president—have been justified by the Justice Department as lawful because they are subject to internal deliberations by the executive branch. “In other words,” writes Amy Davidson for the New Yorker, “it’s due process if the President thinks about it. ”The power to wage war. Ever since Congress granted George W. Bush the authorization to use military force in the wake of 9/11, the United States has been in a state of endless war without Congress ever having declared one. Having pledged to end Bush’s wars, Barack Obama has extended them. As the New York Times notes, “He has now been at war longer than Mr. Bush, or any other American president… he will leave behind an improbable legacy as the only president in American history to serve two complete terms with the nation at war.” More than that, as the Atlantic makes clear, “Obama is inaugurating an era of unbridled war-making by the commander in chief, without any of the checks and balances contemplated by the American constitutional system.” The power to torture. Despite the fact that the Bush Administration’s use of waterboarding as a torture tactic was soundly criticized by Obama, the Obama Administration refused to hold anyone accountable for participating in the rendition and torture programs. In the absence of any finding of criminality, the authorization of such torture tactics remain part of the president’s domain—should he or she ever choose to revive it. The power to spy on American citizens. In the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to carry out surveillance on Americans’ phone calls and emails. The Bush Administration claimed that the Constitution gives the president inherent powers to protect national security. The covert surveillance has continued under Obama. The power to indefinitely detain American citizens. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order requiring that all Japanese-Americans be held in internment camps. While that order was later rescinded, the U.S. Supreme Court declared it to be constitutional. The ruling has never been overturned. Pointing out that such blatantly illegal detentions could happen again—with the blessing of the courts—Justice Scalia warned, “In times of war, the laws fall silent.” In fact, each National Defense Authorization Act enacted since 2012 has included a provision that permits the military to detain individuals—including Americans citizens—indefinitely without trial. The power to strip American citizens of their constitutional rights. The Bush Administration claimed it could strip American citizens of their constitutional rights, imprison them indefinitely, and deny them legal representation simply by labeling them as enemy combatants. While the Obama Administration jettisoned the use of the term “enemy combatant,” it has persisted in defending the president’s unilateral and global right to detain anyone suspected of supporting terrorist activities. The power to secretly rewrite or sidestep the laws of the country. Secret courts, secret orders, and secret budgets have become standard operating procedure for presidential administrations in recent years. A good case in point is Presidential Policy Directive 20, a secret order signed by President Obama as a means of thwarting cyberattacks. Based on what little information was leaked to the press about the clandestine directive, it appears that the president essentially put the military in charge of warding off a possible cyberattack. A FOIA request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) seeking more details on the directive was allegedly denied because doing so could cause “exceptionally grave damage to the national security.” However, EPIC believes the order allows for military deployment within the United States, including the ability to shut off communications with the outside world if the military believes it is necessary. The power to transform the police into extensions of the military and indirectly institute martial law. What began in the 1960s as a war on drugs transitioned into an all-out campaign to transform America’s police forces into extensions of the military. Every successive president since Nixon has added to the police’s arsenal, tactics and authority. In fact, the Obama Administration has accelerated police militarization by distributing military weapons and equipment to police and incentivizing SWAT team raids and heavy-handed police tactics through the use of federal grants and asset forfeiture schemes. The power to command the largest military and intelligence capabilities in the world and, in turn, “wag the dog.” As law professor William P. Marshall points out: In his roles as Commander-in-Chief and head of the Executive Branch, the President directly controls the most powerful military in the world and directs clandestine agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency. That control provides the President with immensely effective, non-transparent capabilities to further his political agenda and/or diminish the political abilities of his opponents. Whether a President would cynically use such power solely for his political advantage has, of course, been the subject of political thrillers and the occasional political attack. President Clinton, for one, was accused of ordering the bombing of terrorist bases in Afghanistan to distract the nation from the Lewinsky scandal, and President Nixon purportedly used the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate his political enemies. But regardless whether such abuses actually occurred, there is no doubt that control of covert agencies provides ample opportunity for political mischief, particularly since the inherently secretive nature of these agencies means their actions often are hidden from public view. And as the capabilities of these agencies increase through technological advances in surveillance and other methods of investigation, so does the power of the President. Thus, it doesn’t matter what the pundits predict, the candidates promise, and the people decree. It doesn’t even matter whether the people elect Trump or Clinton. After all, politicians sing a different tune once elected. For instance, the Chicago Tribune editorial board observed that although Barack Obama opposed the imperial tendencies of George W. Bush, once in office, Obama “wound up behaving as if he had a scepter and throne.” What matters is that the damage has already been done. As Professor Marshall explains, “every extraordinary use of power by one President expands the availability of executive branch power for use by future Presidents.” Moreover, it doesn’t even matter whether other presidents have chosen not to take advantage of any particular power, because “it is a President’s action in using power, rather than forsaking its use, that has the precedential significance.” In other words, each successive president continues to add to his office’s list of extraordinary orders and directives, granting him- or herself near dictatorial powers. So let’s not have any more talk of which candidate would be more dangerous with these powers. The fact that any individual—or branch of government—is empowered to act like a dictator is danger enough. This abuse of presidential powers has been going on for so long that it has become the norm and it will continue no matter which corporate puppet wins the election. The Constitution be damned. The government of laws idealized by John Adams has fallen prey to a government of men. As a result, we no longer have a system of checks and balances. “The system of checks and balances that the Framers envisioned now lacks effective checks and is no longer in balance,” concludes Marshall. “The implications of this are serious. The Framers designed a system of separation of powers to combat government excess and abuse and to curb incompetence. They also believed that, in the absence of an effective separation-of-powers structure, such ills would inevitably follow. Unfortunately, however, power once taken is not easily surrendered.” The solution is far from simple but it’s time, as Marshall suggests, to recalibrate the balance of power. This will mean putting an end to the use of executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements as a means of getting around Congress and the courts. It will mean that Americans will have to stop letting their politics blind them to government wrongdoing. And it will mean holding all three branches of government accountable to the Constitution (i.e., if they abuse their powers, vote them out of office). Thus far, Congress, with little spine, less integrity and too busy running for re-election, has offered little attempt at oversight, enabling the president to ride roughshod over the Constitution. The media—the perfect accomplice in this stealthy, bloodless coup—continues to inundate us with the latest celebrity scandal, says virtually nothing about these burgeoning powers. All the while, most Americans continue to operate in blissful near-ignorance, unaware or uncaring that the republic is about to fall. Yet as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, it will be “we the people”—not the president, the politicians, the corporate elite or the media—who will suffer the consequences when freedom falls and tyranny rises. They may justify violating our freedoms in the name of whatever phantom menace-of-the-month threatens “national security,” but we will always be the ones to pay the price. WC: 1827 Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His book Battlefield America: The War on the American People (SelectBooks, 2015) is available online at Whitehead can be contacted at Publication Guidelines / Reprint Permission: John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact to obtain reprint permission. 

:: 10-14-16 Zero Hedge :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

"The Most Important WikiLeak" - How Wall Street Built The Obama Cabinet

by Tyler Durden Oct 14, 2016 12:45 PM

Perhaps the most startling discovery of the WikiLeaks dumps so far didn't come from the most recent emails surrounding the various Hillary scandals, though there are many great ones, but from 2008 when John Podesta served as co-chair of President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team. The email came from Michael Froman, a former Citibank executive, who single-handedly built the entire cabinet of what was supposed to be the "main street" President. The email in question was even sent from Froman's Citibank email address (rookie!) and includes "A list of African American, Latino and Asian American candidates, broken down by Cabinet/Deputy and Under/Assistant/Deputy Assistant level, plus a list of Native American, Arab/Muslim American and Disabled American candidates." Apparently Obama wasn't as worried about placing women in senior-level positions but Froman decided to offer up some suggestions anyway. "While you did not ask for this, I prepared and attached a similar document on women." Froman even went ahead and "scoped out" which people should be appointed to which cabinet positions. "At the risk of being presumptuous, I also scoped out how the Cabinet-level appointments might be put together, probability-weighting the likelihood of appointing a diverse candidate for each position (given one view of the short list) and coming up with a straw man distribution." As New Republic points out, the Froman appointments ended up being almost entirely right. The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money. It correctly identified Eric Holder for the Justice Department, Janet Napolitano for Homeland Security, Robert Gates for Defense, Rahm Emanuel for chief of staff, Peter Orszag for the Office of Management and Budget, Arne Duncan for Education, Eric Shinseki for Veterans Affairs, Kathleen Sebelius for Health and Human Services, Melody Barnes for the Domestic Policy Council, and more. For the Treasury, three possibilities were on the list: Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner. This was October 6. The election was November 4. And yet Froman, an executive at Citigroup, which would ultimately become the recipient of the largest bailout from the federal government during the financial crisis, had mapped out virtually the entire Obama cabinet, a month before votes were counted. And according to the Froman/Podesta emails, lists were floating around even before that. Many already suspected that Froman, a longtime Obama consigliere, did the key economic policy hiring while part of the transition team. We didn’t know he had so much influence that he could lock in key staff that early, without fanfare, while everyone was busy trying to get Obama elected. The WikiLeaks emails show even earlier planning; by September the transition was getting pre-clearance to assist nominees with financial disclosure forms. So if this history is any guide then the real power within a future Clinton administration is being formed right now. In fact, another email from January 2015 reveals that Elizabeth Warren was already "intently focused on personnel issues" almost two full years ago as evidenced by the following recap of a conversation that the Hillary campaign had with her Chief of Staff, Dan Geldon. He was intently focused on personnel issues, laid out a detailed case against the Bob Rubin school of Democratic policy makers, was very critical of the Obama administration's choices, and explained at length the opposition to Antonio Weiss. We then carefully went through a list of people they do like, which EW sent over to HRC earlier. We spent less time on specific policies, because he seemed less interested in that. He spoke repeatedly about the need to have in place people with ambition and urgency who recognize how much the middle class is hurting and are willing to challenge the financial industry.

To read the e-mails go to: 

:: 10-13-16 The Korea Herald :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Advisory body calls for US tactical nukes as it meets with Park

Published: 2016-10-13 16:50 Updated: 2016-10-13 17:19

President Park Geun-hye’s advisory panel on unification policy has proposed a reintroduction of US tactical nuclear weapons and the constant stationing of other advanced strategic assets on the peninsula as deterrence against North Korea’s evolving threats. In a recent paper, the National Unification Advisory Council made an array of policy suggestions, raising the need to better utilize top-notch US weapons systems such as the F-22 stealth fighter and B-2 nuclear bomber. On home ground, Seoul should bring forward the establishment of its own Kill Chain and Korea Air and Missile Defense pre-emptive strike schemes, which are currently scheduled for the early 2020s to be used with the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-missile system expected to be deployed here late next year. “To explore the reinstatement of US tactical nuclear weapons and the permanent placement of some state-of-the-art US strategic assets inside the South could serve as pressure on not only North Korea, but also China over its sanctions against the North,” the report reads. “(During the Cold War,) the US’ deployment of Pershing II missiles in Europe against the then Soviet Union’s SS nuclear-equipped missiles helped place the Soviet on the defensive in their strategic weapons race and eventually served as a factor behind its collapse.” The NUAC also called for a comprehensive scheme to overhaul the impact of international sanctions against the communist state such as by creating a new expert group here apart from the UN mechanism. If Pyongyang carries out further provocations, additional steps should be taken to bar civilian trade and the dispatch of workers overseas as well as expand the blacklist of individuals and entities, it said. Presided over by the president, the council writes a quarterly paper to be submitted to Cheong Wa Dae, which contains a set of policy suggestions drawn up through discussions and deliberations among experts. The latest report was handed over late September, officials said. Later on Thursday, Park met with 530 international members of the panel from 92 countries, who were gathered in Seoul for a four-day conference. A focal point is whether she will look at the proposed ideas afresh, despite having reaffirmed Seoul’s commitment to a nuclear-free peninsula. Since Pyongyang’s fourth and fifth nuclear tests this year, some senior lawmakers and analysts have been calling for the allies to bring tactical nuclear weapons here, if Seoul is not to take the path toward its own nuclear armament. Choi Kang, vice president of the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, said that any armament move would face extreme difficulty in gaining acceptance worldwide and could also bring political, diplomatic, economic and military repercussions to Seoul. “South Korea should constantly emphasize that it will not need to build nuclear weapons if the US guarantees its extended deterrence in a more concrete and practical manner, but if not, it will inevitably be placed in a position (of having) to pursue its own bomb-making capabilities,” he wrote on the think tank’s blog Thursday. “Meanwhile, South Korea may argue for the redeployment of tactical nukes starting with the hosting of dual capable military assets.” By Shin Hyon-hee ( 

:: 10-11-16 Friends of Syria word press :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

IT’S OVER: Hillary’s ISIS Email Just Leaked & It’s Worse Than Anyone Could Have Imagined…


Today Wikileaks released what is, by far, the most devastating leak of the entire campaign. This makes Trump’s dirty talk video looks like an episode of Barney and Friends. Even though when Trump called Hillary the ‘founder’ of ISIS he was telling the truth and 100% accurate, the media has never stopped ripping him apart over it. Today the media is forced to eat their hats because the newest batch of leaked emails show Hillary, in her own words, admitting to doing just that, funding and running ISIS. John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign chair, who was also a counselor to President Obama at the time, was the recipient of the 2014 email which was released today. Assange promised his latest batch of leaks would lead to the indictment of Hillary, and it looks like he was not kidding. The email proves Hillary knew and was complicit in the funding and arming of ISIS by our ‘allies’ Saudi Arabia and Qatar!

“the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL…” Clinton wrote


Date: 2014-09-27 15:15

Subject: Congrats!

Send our love to Chelsea, Marc and Grandpa. Can't wait to meet Charlotte.

On Aug 19, 2014 9:22 AM, "H" <> wrote:

Agree but there may be opportunities as the Iraqi piece improves. Also, any idea whose fighters attacked Islamist positions in Tripoli, Libya? Worth analyzing for future purposes.

*From*: John Podesta []

*Sent*: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 09:19 AM

*To*: H

*Subject*: Re: Here's what I mentioned Hit send too soon. Meant to say Syria elements are vexing.

On Aug 19, 2014 9:17 AM, "John Podesta" <> wrote:

> I think we are headed down this path in Iraq, but the Syria elements are

> On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" <> wrote:

>> Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region.

>> 1. With all of its tragic aspects, the advance of ISIL through Iraq gives the U.S. Government an opportunity to change the way it deals with the chaotic security situation in North Africa and the Middle East. The most important factor in this matter is to make use of intelligence resources and Special Operations troops in an aggressive manner, while avoiding the old school solution, which calls for more traditional military operations. In Iraq it is important that we engage ISIL using the resources of the Peshmerga fighters of the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG), and what, if any, reliable units exist in the Iraqi Army. The Peshmerga commanders are aggressive hard fighting troops, who have long standing relationships with CIA officers and Special Forces operators. However, they will need the continued commitment of U.S. personnel to work with them as advisors and strategic planners, the new generation of Peshmerga commanders being largely untested in traditional combat. That said, with this U.S. aid the Kurdish troops can inflict a real defeat on ISIL.

2. It is important that once we engage ISIL, as we have now done in a limited manner, we and our allies should carry on until they are driven back suffering a tangible defeat. Anything short of this will be seen by other fighters in the region, Libya, Lebanon, and even Jordan, as an American defeat. However, if we provide advisors and planners, as well as increased close air support for the Peshmerga, these soldiers can defeat ISIL. They will give the new Iraqi Government a chance to organize itself, and restructure the Sunni resistance in Syria, moving the center of power toward moderate forces like the Free Syrian Army (FSA). In addition to air support, the Peshmerga also need artillery and armored vehicles to deal with the tanks and other heavy equipment captured from the Iraqi army by ISIL.

3. In the past the USG, in an agreement with the Turkish General Staff, did not provide such heavy weapons to the Peshmerga, out of a concern that they would end up in the hands of Kurdish rebels inside of Turkey. The current situation in Iraq, not to mention the political environment in Turkey, makes this policy obsolete. Also this equipment can now be airlifted directly into the KRG zone.

 4. Armed with proper equipment, and working with U.S. advisors, the Peshmerga can attack the ISIL with a coordinated assault supported from the air. This effort will come as a surprise to the ISIL, whose leaders believe we will always stop with targeted bombing, and weaken them both in Iraq and inside of Syria. At the same time we should return to plans to provide the FSA, or some group of moderate forces, with equipment that will allow them to deal with a weakened ISIL, and stepped up operations against the Syrian regime. This entire effort should be done with a low profile, avoiding the massive traditional military operations that are at best temporary solutions. While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia,  which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region. This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the KRG. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure. By the same token, the threat of similar, realistic U.S. operations will serve to assist moderate forces in Libya, Lebanon, and even Jordan, where insurgents are increasingly fascinated by the ISIL success in Iraq.

 6. In the end the situation in Iraq is merely the latest and most dangerous example of the regional restructuring that is taking place across North Africa, all the way to the Turkish border. These developments are important to the U.S. for reasons that often differ from country to country: energy and moral commitment to Iraq, energy issues in Libya, and strategic commitments in Jordan. At the same time, as Turkey moves toward a new, more serious Islamic reality, it will be important for them to realize that we are willing to take serious actions, which can be sustained to protect our national interests. This course of action offers the potential for success, as opposed to large scale, traditional military campaigns, that are too expensive and awkward to maintain over time.

7. (Note: A source in Tripoli stated in confidence that when the U.S. Embassy was evacuated, the presence of two U.S. Navy jet fighters over the city brought all fighting to a halt for several hours, as Islamist forces were not certain that these aircraft would not also provide close ground support for moderate government forces.)

8. If we do not take the changes needed to make our security policy in the region more realistic, there is a real danger of ISIL veterans moving on to other countries to facilitate operations by Islamist forces. This is already happening in Libya and Egypt, where fighters are returning from Syria to work with local forces. ISIL is only the latest and most violent example of this process. If we don’t act to defeat them in Iraq something even more violent and dangerous will develop. Successful military operations against these very irregular but determined forces can only be accomplished by making proper use of clandestine/special operations resources, in coordination with airpower, and established local allies. There is, unfortunately, a narrow window of opportunity on this issue, as we need to act before an ISIL state becomes better organized and reaches into Lebanon and Jordan.

 9. (Note: It is important to keep in mind that as a result of this policy there probably will be concern in the Sunni regions of Iraq and the Central Government regarding the possible expansion of KRG controlled territory. With advisors in the Peshmerga command we can reassure the concerned parties that, in return for increase autonomy, the KRG will not exclude the Iraqi Government from participation in the management of the oil fields around Kirkuk, and the Mosel Dam hydroelectric facility. At the same time we will be able to work with the Peshmerga as they pursue ISIL into disputed areas of Eastern Syria, coordinating with FSA troops who can move against ISIL from the North. This will make certain Basher al Assad does not gain an advantage from these operations. Finally, as it now appears the U.S. is considering a plan to offer contractors as advisors to the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, we will be in a position to coordinate more effectively between the Peshmerga and the Iraqi Army.) 

:: 10-13-16 Life News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Black Pastors: If Black Lives Matter You Can’t Vote for Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton

Opinion Steven Ertelt Oct 13, 2016 | 3:32PM Washington, DC

Two leading African-American pro-life pastors say black voters should rule out voting for pro-abortion presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Rev. Dr. Johnny Hunter says if black lives really matter then black voters will not vote for Hillary Clinton on the basis of her staunch support for unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy paid for at taxpayer expense. He says Roe vs. Wade, which Clinton strongly supports and wants to keep in place for decades more, has resulted in the abortions of 20 million African American babies. “Blacks are clearly targeted by this practice,” Hunter says of abortion. “In an age of political correctness and racial sensitivity how is it that Hillary Clinton proudly receives the Margaret Sanger award,” adds Rev Dr. Clenard Childress, another black pastor. He points out that Sanger stated, “colored people are like human weeds and need to be exterminated,” “How can a person seeking the highest office in the land not be demanded to return that award back to Planned Parenthood? How can African Americans especially support such a candidate, its absurd?” Childress asks. Childress is concerned that the ways in which abortion and the abortion industry target black women and children is often downplayed. SIGN THE PLEDGE! We Oppose Hillary Clinton! Rev. Childress stated, “How can you have 20 million African Americans missing directly due to abortion and have no mention of it. It would be like the Jews not mentioning the Holocaust. African American’s don’t need another entity manipulating and contorting facts to fit their political agenda. Let the people know the truth.” Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke previously asked Clinton to return an award from the Planned Parenthood abortion corporation named for its racist founder Margaret Sanger. In fact, Clinton can boast the first-ever endorsement of a candidate in a presidential primary in the nearly 100-year existence of Planned Parenthood. In a statement, Clinton said she was “honored” by the endorsement. But the presidential endorsement wasn’t the first time Planned Parenthood honored Clinton. In 2009, Clinton proudly accepted Planned Parenthood’s self-described “highest honor,” its coveted Sanger Award. She blushed and gushed that she was “in awe of” the racial eugenicist. Margaret Sanger’s racist views have long been established. As writer Eric Metaxas notes: Sanger wrote about the “deterioration in the human stock” and “the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents, and dependents.” Lest you have any doubt about what this woman of so-called “courage, … tenacity, [and] vision” meant, Sanger was committed to reducing the number of African Americans through contraception. Quoth Sanger: “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Isn’t it amazing that a woman who said what Sanger did isn’t vilified more generally as a racist intent on eliminating African Americans? 

:: 10-13-16 Daily Mail :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Italy's Catholic Church cannot keep up with demand for EXORCISTS as more than 500,000 people call on help to rid themselves of demons in one year

The Roman Catholic Church in Italy has only got TEN exorcists left

Father Vincenzo Taraborelli has urged the Vatican to hire and train more

Around 10 million Italians have consulted amateurs and other 'charlatans'

By Chris Summers For Mailonline Published: 10:48 EST, 13 October 2016 | Updated: 11:02 EST, 13 October 2016

The Vatican is struggling to cope with a massive rise in demand for exorcists by Italians who are finding themselves increasingly menaced by demons. The archdiocese of Milan has doubled the number of its exorcists and a telephone hotline in Rome has been ringing off the hook. Father Vincenzo Taraborelli, who recently took over as the Vatican's head exorcist, says there have been 500,000 requests in Italy this year and he says and his small team cannot keep up with the demand. He told Breitbart: 'There are only nine of us left and many more are needed. We need other priests like me to meet the needs of so many families. Padre Vincenzo, as he is known, sometimes handles up to 30 'clients' a day. Last month, as an Italian documentary, Liberami, on exorcism won the best film at the Venice Film Festival, the country's most experienced exorcist, Father Gabriele Amorth, died aged 91. Liberami's director Federica Di Giacomo, follows the efforts of Father Cataldo, a veteran exorcist in Sicily, in her movie. In Frosinone, near Rome, another exorcist Father Ildebrando Di Fulvio, said when people asked for their relatives to be exorcised they were often ignoring more obvious issues like chronic depression or schizophrenia. Father Di Fulvio claims to be able to spot when someone is possessed by a demon rather than in the thrall of mental illness. He lists these as deformed facial expression; cavernous voice; spitting out food or metal objects; speaking in ancient languages; unnatural physical strength; and violent reactions to prayers and holy water. Father Aldo Buonaiuto says 10 million Italians have consulted amateur exorcists but he says: 'Most of them are charlatans who dupe desperate customers, but among them are some Satanists.'

Read more: 

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

:: 10-14-16 Fellowship of the Minds :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The liberal in bed with Paul Ryan

Posted on October 14, 2016 by Dr. Eowyn

Geoff Ross writes for Dr. Rich Swier, May 18, 2016, that marriage is “a team effort” and that of House Speaker Paul Ryan is no different:

“A solid marriage will have the man supporting the wife’s decision’s and vice versa.

So if you are scratching your head and rubbing your rabbit foot in an expression of confusion and lack of understanding of Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and his blatant liberal agenda and decision making processes all you have to do is look into his family unit. Then you will learn that he supporting [sic] his wife’s ideology. As a man should and probably to remain in good graces in a supportive marriage. Paul Ryan is married to Janna Little a liberal, left wing progressive, anti-Constitutional, big government George Soros supporter who voted for Barack Hussein Obama twice.” From Stephanie Dube Dwilson’s October 2015 column for, “Janna Ryan, Paul’s Wife: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know”: “Janna comes from a Democratic family. Her cousin, Dan Boren, was a Democratic Representative for Oklahoma from 2005 to 2013. Dan’s father, David Boren, was the 21st governor of Oklahoma from 1975 to 1979. Dan’s grandfather, Lyle Boren, was a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1937 to 1947. Janna’s grandfather, Reuel Little, helped found a third party called the American Party in Oklahoma in 1968. He ran for governor in 1970 but didn’t win, ABC News reported. Janna herself has lobbied for liberal movements, such as marching in Washington in college for women’s rights, The New York Times reported. Janna rarely gives interviews, CNN reported, and doesn’t speak publicly about her political views.” From a New York Times report of August 23, 2012, after Paul Ryan was selected by Mitt Romney to be his VP running-mate: Friends say Mrs. Ryan chose her political life’s path with a sense of purpose, and they describe her as being a “practical conservative” these days, even if she might once have been more of a Democrat. […] She is not, however, someone who has shied away from asserting herself. Mrs. Ryan is a lawyer and a tax specialist who, before her marriage, worked for prestigious government affairs and accounting firms as a lobbyist, representing some of the biggest names in a range of industries, including Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Novartis and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. […] Mrs. Ryan’s professors [at Wellesley] described her as being interested in social justice and the broader world around her. […] “I didn’t get the sense that she was a political activist,” said Professor Renjilian-Burgy, who wrote Mrs. Ryan’s recommendation to study abroad. But when it came to topics like the history and treatment of indigenous peoples around the world, Professor Renjilian-Burgy said, “she was very sensitive to these issues.” According to the New York Times, in 2011 the Ryans had assets valued at between $2 million and $7.8 million, “much of which is in Mrs. Ryan’s trust.” Ryan’s girlfriend before he married Janna Little is also a Democrat — a black woman named Daneeta Pope who also had twice voted for Obama. According to Daily Mail, Daneeta Pope had spent 5 months in prison for defrauding her employer Ernst & Young out of $77,000 in 1999, according to the federal Bureau of Prisons. Pope said she used the funds to attend an educational course — which did not exist. Paul Ryan has stayed in touch with Pope over the two decades since they broke up, including attending her wedding in May 2012. Geoff Ross concludes: “Speaker Paul Ryan will not operate his family unit and make decisions that will cause friction and go against the will of his wife. So if you want to understand why Speaker Ryan funded Obamacare and Planned Parent Hood, I suggest you ask his wife. She is wearing the pants in the family metaphorically speaking. In my humble opinion. If you want to know why Paul Ryan is using taxpayer money to fund 100,000 un-vetted Syrians for a free taxpayer funded ride in cities across the United States ask his wife…. the bleeding heart liberal that she is. She is pro-open borders. Paul Ryan’s decisions and thought processes are a reflection of his spouse’s mindset. Mrs. Ryan is a life long Democrat who is pushing Obama’s agenda through her husband. And of course a happy life is a happy wife. […] Paul Ryan is not a conservative my friends… if he was he would never have married Jenna Little. […] Speaker Paul Ryan is a Charlie Crist Republican, who is perhaps being manipulated by a Liberal wife. […] Politics makes for strange bedfellows, in this case it is Janna and Paul Ryan.” 

:: 10-14-16 The Common Sense Evaluation :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: 

Wikileaks Exposes The Possible Assassination Of Scalia

According to new Wikileaks emails, three days before Justice Scalia died this email was sent, using the term “wet works”. The term is used exclusively in the Military meaning “Assassination”.

Scribe Note: Click on the link below and read the very short e-mail 

:: 10-14-16 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Russian Insider Warns Fate Of All Humanity At Stake With US Election As Mike Pence Talks Revolution In America: 'There's A Revolution Coming November 8th, I Promise You'

October 14, 2016 By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

In the 2nd video below featuring a Russian friend of Vladimir Putin, we're warned direly that the current US presidential election has left the fate of all humanity at stake. Telling us that Hillary Clinton shouldn't even be managing a bath house much less running for presidential election, Vladimir Zhirinovsky asks a great question: "What happens if a sick person has her fingers on the button and what if she presses the wrong button? What happens to America then?" According to Republican Vice Presidential candidate Mike Pence, "there's a revolution coming on November 8th, I promise you." While Pence's 'peaceful revolution talk' was meant to calm down a supporter who had previously shouted out "I will tell you for me, personally, if Hillary Clinton gets in … I’m ready for a revolution because we can’t have her in", we've warned time and again on ANP that America is quickly approaching our darkest hour. According to the new story from Fox News, long time FBI and Department of Justice employees are absolutely sickened by the fact that Hillary Clinton was let off the hook by the Obama administration for crimes that would have sent anybody else to prison. Unanimously disgusted that Clinton's security clearance wasn't yanked, we're told 100 FBI agents and analysts worked around the clock with six attorneys from the DOJ’s National Security Division, Counter Espionage Section, to investigate the case. “It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.” While Donald Trump promised in the last debate to appoint a special prosecutor to take Hillary down for crimes committed that would have sent any other American to the slammer, what happens to America if somehow Clinton dodges the judgement of the American people at the election booth on November 8th and is (s)elected into office and Americans no longer have any legal recourse against a person many call the most corrupt politician in US history? As Gary Franchi of the Next News Network tells us in the first video below, a Clinton presidency would likely bring in a full-scale socialist dictatorship to America. If she begins to implement executive order after executive order to complete the globalists takedown of America, with those orders including the confiscation of guns from those she finds 'deplorable' and throwing law-abiding but 'deplorable' American citizens into 'hillary fun camps', would Americans simply 'take it'? If such a worst-case-scenario arrives, and Hillary begins to 'up her body count' by rounding up and slaughering peaceful, law-abiding Americans 'en masse', her way of 'staging an intervention', is there any way in the world that America can AVOID a revolution with a 'peaceful revolution' at the voting booth then no longer a possibility and a mass-murdering tyrant in office? Even former US president John F. Kennedy once warned: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable". Would an outright globalists 'steal' of the US election qualify as making the 'peaceful revolution' spoke of by Pence impossible? With Hillary's campaign manager John Podesta making assassination references in emails soon before the death of Supreme Court Justice Anton Scalia, does anybody really think America is dealing with a lawful gang? As a martial artist who was trained by a wonderful teacher who also trained Secret Service agents who guard Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base in Camp Springs, Maryland, I long ago learned that violence should only be used as a very last option and only after a series of other options have been explored. At ANP, we have long stood against any kind of unnecessary violence and that includes the violence being permitted and endorsed by Hillary Clinton and the US government who are arming terrorists overseas to overthrow Syrian President Assad, and who later come back to America as sleeper agents of terror to kill Americans. While the Obama administration continues to blame Russia for the DNC hacks that have exposed massive corruption within the US government and particularly the Clinton's, even Russia has warned that a Clinton presidency will likely bring war with Clinton heading a new 'axis of evil'. As we're asked by Zhirinovsky, what happens to America if a warmongering Hillary Clinton pushes the wrong button and launches a nuclear attack against a nation that could wipe us off of the face of the Earth? We've also asked this before on ANP: Would it be worth it to YOU to have your neighborhood completely destroyed and up to 90% or more of your close friends and family dead in order to protect Hillary Clinton's never ending series of lies? While we continue to stand very strongly against any kind of violence or revolution or civil war in America as that is exactly what the globalists want here to continue their crackdown upon liberty and the American people, we certainly understand the desperation felt by Trump's supporter who felt revolution might be the only way to save America and her children's futures. Imagine waking up on November 9th to the knowledge that Hillary Clinton, along with Bill, will once again be in the White House in January despite the emails that have put America and Americans in danger, despite having American blood on her hands for Benghazi, despite her never ending series of lies and more lies to cover up those lies. As we're told in this story from Mike Adams over at Natural News, Hillary Clinton is a congenital liar who lies about lying. When caught lying, she proclaims her accuser is the liar and that she alone has a monopoly on the truth. But it's far worse than that, really. When you look at her policies, the "hatred in her heart" pointed out by Trump, the criminality, the money laundering, the threats against female victims of Bill's sexual assaults, the violation of national security laws and the psychopathic personality she exhibits, it's clear that Hillary Clinton wants to be the leader of America's SUICIDE CULT. Is this what it has all now come down to? What the Trump supporter saw who stated she was ready for revolution is the final end of America, wrapped up and exemplified by Hillary Clinton and all of her lies and lies to cover up her lies. There's no longer any doubt in our mind that Hillary's role in this world stage we're now living upon is to bring about the end of 'America'. Not only would she immediately become the most hated president in US history but the least respected leader around the entire world. Is there anybody reading this who would actually 'respect' a 'President Hillary Clinton' considering all of her enabling of Bill, considering she allowed Americans to die on HER watch, considering she looks upon more than half of America as deplorable, considering the complete and total mess she's turned the Middle East into, and considering she's arming ISIS terrorists while hoping to take away YOUR means of protection YOUR FAMILY against the same terrorists she's arming? While ANP will continue to work towards the peaceful revolution that John F. Kennedy knew was necessary in order for violent revolution to be avoided, we're quite concerned that only a violent and lawless dictator could bring revolution to America and a violent and lawless dictator in America may be precisely the direction we're now heading. We pray that Pence's call for 'peaceful revolution' on November 8th carries America and the world in a much more peaceful direction. 

[ :: 7-15-15 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. For I have warned you Russia is not your friend, I have warned you that China is not your friend, I have warned you that North Korea is not your friend and I have warned you that Iran is not your friend. etc.

[ :: 3-4-12 am service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. They are saying it can’t come here because it has never come here and yet destruction covers the face of the earth, the face of the earth.  You can see the things that are going on, you can watch as the blood flows in the streets of many countries.  You can see as they prepare to go to war to fight a war they cannot win or that will bring more disaster even to this country and yet they push to do the very things they desire and want to do.  They want everything, but want to do nothing in return, oh what a time, what an hour. etc.

:: 10-14-16 ABC News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Russian Television Warns of Nuclear War Amid US Tensions

By PATRICK REEVELL Oct 14, 2016, 4:32 PM ET

With diplomatic relations between Moscow and Washington at their lowest point since the Cold War, turning on Russian television can be an alarming experience. For the past month, Russian media outlets have been punctuated with reports asking people whether they are ready for nuclear war. "If it should one day happen, every one of you should know where the nearest bomb shelter is. It’s best to find out now," according to one particularly fevered report on the Russian state-owned channel, NTV. Russia’s main current affairs show, hosted by a presenter known by critics as the country’s propagandist-in-chief, recently spent two hours warning that Russia would defend itself with nuclear arms. "We’ve had it with American abuse over Syria," the show’s host, Evgeny Kiselyov, told his audience. "Impudent behavior," from the U.S. towards Russia, he said, can now take on "nuclear dimensions." Anti-Americanism is not rare on Russian state news, nor is an inclination for the apocalyptic. But more notable than the intensity of the warnings has been how Russian government ministries have joined in the alarms in recent weeks. Since September, Russia has conducted a nationwide civil defense drill, purportedly involving 40 million people, preparing them for catastrophes -- among them nuclear fallout. Russia’s military announced who would run the country in the event of war and ran an exercise simulating that in the south. Even more bluntly, Russia announced this week it was moving nuclear-capable ballistic missiles into its Northern European enclave, Kaliningrad, putting them within striking distance of Western capitals. In the same week, Russia test-fired 3 intercontinental ballistic missiles. Such moves have further raised the temperature with the West, already exceptionally high since the U.S. publicly accused Moscow of trying to interfere in its presidential elections and efforts by the two countries to reach a cease-fire deal terrorists in Syria, collapsed amid mutual recrimination and the renewal of ferocious airstrikes by Russian jets on the besieged city of Aleppo. But the blood-curdling statements and military posturing, however, are very far from heralding imminent war, analysts said. "It’s ridiculous," said Aleksander Baunov, an analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Center. "It’s not preparation for war." Like other Russia observers, he said the atomic-fueled reports and exercises may have several purposes, but none of them were to prepare the populace for major conflict. The nuclear threats, while frightening, reflected an sense in Russia that they could be made without real fear of being taken sincerely. "The ease with which people in this country use the nuclear threat in their aggressive rhetoric is truly amazing and of course alarming," Maria Lipman, a veteran Russian analyst and editor-in-chief of Counterpoint journal. That relative unconcern is perhaps reflected in that the war talk does not appear to have much traction among Russians. What's more Baunov said, anti-Americanism not especially high among ordinary people currently, limited he said to official discourse. That discourse, rather than heralding war, Baunov said, was meant to deter Western countries from intervening in Syria and in particular perhaps was meant to prevent the U.S. from responding too strongly to suspected Russian interference in the U.S. elections. Moscow, he said, is trying to set the field ahead of an incoming U.S. president, whoever wins. "They want to touch bottom and then to try to go up," he said. "Any responsible politician ... if you are responsible and experienced, it cannot start with further downgrading already bad relations, if they are already at bottom." The fevered rhetoric on television and pointed deployments of nuclear launch vehicles recalled the height of the Ukraine crisis in 2014, when Russia too sought to guarantee against Western intervention and buttress support for its actions at home. This time, the chances of a real military confrontation between Russia and the U.S. have risen dramatically since Washington indicated it was considering launching airstrikes against the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to halt his brutal bombardment of Aleppo and push Moscow and Assad back to the negotiating table. Russia’s Defense Ministry has bluntly warned the U.S. not to intervene, threatening to shoot down any aircraft targeting Assad’s forces. But still few expect the Obama administration to approve such an intervention, which would abandon years of policy avoiding direct military intervention against Assad, at a moment when it also risked provoking an armed clash with Russia. Lipman warned the two countries' perilously diverging goals in Syria and an escalating logic in their exchanges, could see that confrontation spiral unpredictably out of control. "I think this is unprecedented," she said. "One reckless move could turn what until know has still been a Syrian conflict into something I don't even want to think about." Beyond geopolitical clashes, though, there may also be a more prosaic reason for the war talk -- Russia's military budget is currently up for consideration at a time when the economy is in trouble, weighed down by low oil prices and Western sanctions over the Kremlin's foreign military ventures. "The more tension the better for the Russian General Staff," Pavel Felgenhauer, a military analyst in Moscow, said. "Tensions are going to rise and rise and rise." "The good news is no one really wants a war," he added. "But it’s going to be a good show." For ordinary Russians it appeared an overly familiar show. Though often describing themselves as outraged by U.S. behavior in Syria, most seemed inured to the suggestions of possible nuclear doom, taking a more realistic view of the television warnings. Photos appeared on social media from a suburban apartment block where pranksters or enterprising fraudsters had pinned fliers to a stairwell asking residents to begin donating cash for the construction of a local bomb shelter. "Hurry, places are limited," the fliers read. 

:: 10-13-16 RT :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Russia tests ‘unrivaled’ new radio-electronic weapon – producer

Published time: 13 Oct, 2016 15:54 Edited time: 13 Oct, 2016 17:50

Russia has developed and successfully tested radio-electronic weapons systems unmatched anywhere in the world, RIA Novosti reports, citing the manufacturer. "Real prototypes of such weapons have already been created and they have proven their efficiency,” a representative of Russia’s United Instrument Manufacturing Company (OPK), which is in charge of the production, told RIA Novosti. The new technology falls under the somewhat loose term "weapons based on new physical principles." The grouping includes armaments that employ physical processes and phenomena not generally used in modern weapons. Laser and sonic weapons are among other examples of such technology. According to the OPK representative, the brand-new Russian system is as yet unrivaled. “This is a completely new type of weapon, which has no analogues in our country, and I daresay, in the world." The announcement came during the ‘Arms High-tech’ military exhibition currently taking place in Armenia. The state-of-the-art system is capable of disabling various types of targets without using the traditional rounds or shells. Instead, the weapon uses ‘directed energy.’ "It conducts indirect physical impact on the on-board equipment of aircraft or drones and neutralizes precision-guided weapons," RIA quotes the OPK representative as saying. The weapon was for the first time presented to Russian military officials in September this year during a closed performance at the annual military expo ‘Army 2016’ outside Moscow. In February, US Air Force General Philip Breedlove warned of the rising electronic warfare capabilities in Russia, the National Interest reported. “They [Russia] have invested a lot in electronic warfare because they know we are a connected and precise force and they need to disconnect us to make us imprecise,” Breedlove said. The US is working on numerous projects of non-conventional weapons, including radio, electronic, infrared and laser ones. “We have electronic warfare capability – we probably do not have the capacity we need now,” Breedlove noted. In April this year, Russia’s Radio-Electronic Technologies Concern (KRET) announced it has started trials of a tactical electromagnetic combat complex fully integrated with the latest air-defense systems. The system is designed to suppress any existing and prospective airborne electronic equipment, making it impossible for the aircraft and satellites to proceed with their missions. 

:: 10-14-16 Prepper Fortress :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

America Is About To Change Forever Everyone Needs To Be Prepared For That -Putin Warns America That WW3 Is Unavoidable – Russia Sign S-400 Air Defence Deal With India

Posted on October 14, 2016 Written by Amy S.

The US will allow weaponized drones by the year 2017. Russia signs agreement with India for the S400, Iran completes its delivery of the S-300. The new version of the missile, a formal contract for which is likely to be signed at the bilateral meet with Russia in Goa between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Vladimir Putin, will be the first major upscaling of the Brahmos joint venture signed in 1998. Russia has also announced that an agreement on S-400 Triumf anti-aircraft missile system will also be signed on Saturday at the summit. Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov was quoted in Russian reports as saying that a contract would be inked. India has a Rs 39,000-crore plan to acquire the S-400 system that will severely restrict Pakistan air force’s ability to operate even within its own airspace. Government sources have told ETthat talks on the new version of the Brahmos was finalised after months of discussion and it would figure as a prominent example of military cooperation at the summit. Besides, India and Russia are also set to formalise a new joint venture between HAL and Kamov to manufacture a new series of light military choppers. The US has F16 ready to strike in Djibouti. USS Mason fires tomahawk missiles at the Houthi radar stations. Iran deploys warships off the coast of Yemen. Iraq prepares for a major offensive in Mosul. The moderate rebels shelled a market place. Russia agrees to let the rebels and terrorists out of Aleppo. Kerry and Lavrov try for peace once again. Russian embassy continually hit in Syria. The royal airforce gives permission to pilots to fire on Russian jets if they think they might be fired upon. Fighter planes, drones, bombers, even submarines and surface warships could see heavy losses in the first days and weeks of a big war. Other hardware may prove obsolete or vulnerable to enemy action and require immediate replacement or abandonment. Most of these complex platforms require months or years to produce. Warm production lines with readily available manufacturing materials must be available to accelerate production quickly. There may be some lessons to be learned from the rapid production of MRAPs at the height of the IED threat in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further, the services should inventory their boneyards to identify what systems could be rapidly reconfigured for combat use with some advanced preparation. This is a major strategic gap that may not be able to be filled before a big war starts, because it is psychological in nature. The military and the nation must both be mentally and emotionally prepared for large numbers of dead and wounded troops — and possibly civilians, too. Big wars tend to be bloodily indiscriminate toward both. Hundreds and perhaps thousands of killed and wounded may be incurred in hours and days rather than months and years; generals may no longer be able to carry slim packets of index cards with their names and stories as has become common practice in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Bloody mindedness” among fighting generals and admirals may once again become a necessary war-winning attribute — in stark contrast to recent limited wars. The United States, of course, is deeply involved in these initiatives. Not only will it supply many of the troops for the four multinational battalions, but it is also taking many steps of its own to bolster NATO’s eastern flank. Spending on the Pentagon’s “European Reassurance Initiative” will quadruple, climbing from $789 million in 2016 to $3.4 billion in 2017. Much of this additional funding will go to the deployment, on a rotating basis, of an additional armored-brigade combat team in northern Europe. As a further indication of US and NATO determination to prepare for a possible war with Russia, the alliance recently conducted the largest war games in Eastern Europe since the end of the Cold War. Known as Anakonda 2016, the exercise involved some 31,000 troops (about half of them Americans) and thousands of combat vehicles from 24 nations in simulated battle maneuvers across the breadth of Poland. A parallel naval exercise, BALTOPS 16, simulated “high-end maritime warfighting” in the Baltic Sea, including in waters near Kaliningrad, a heavily defended Russian enclave wedged between Poland and Lithuania. Not trying to scare anyone here but these are some serious questions to consider — if the U.S. is truly on the brink of a major war that most of the U.S. probably doesn’t expect anytime soon. Maybe it’s time for the U.S. to wake up and realize that we may truly be on the brink of war — a war of Biblical proportions. It’s also a good time to start praying — even if it’s the first time in your life. Prepping for Long Term Survival The electrical grid goes down. For good. You need a power source. Like solar. You need food and water and essential emergency supplies … And you need to put serious thought into weapons for hunting and self defense. You also need a survival plan with a number of specific objectives. You see, once the grid goes down, you may only have weeks … or just days … or just minutes before enemy planes thunder overhead. Everyone needs to be prepared for that. Unfortunately, another world war is inevitable. You better weapon-up and start studying about food preservation and which foods to start stockpiling on. etc. 

:: 10-15-16 The Express :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Nuclear war 'IMMINENT' as Russia tells citizens to find out where the closest bunkers are

NUCLEAR war could be imminent as Russia told its citizens to urgently prepare for a devastating radioactive conflict as relations with the West stoop to their lowest since the Cold War.

By Patrick Christys PUBLISHED: 02:09, Sat, Oct 15, 2016 | UPDATED: 09:18, Sat, Oct 15, 2016

A terrifying Russian television broadcast explicitly told civilians to find out where their nearest bomb shelter is and repeatedly asked viewers if they were ready for nuclear war. One apocalyptic broadcast told viewers on Moscow's state-owned TV channel NTV: "If it should one day happen, every one of you should know where the nearest bomb shelter is. It’s best to find out now." The enraged host, Evgeny Kiselyov, blasted America's "impudent behaviour" and spent two hours warning that a conflict could take "nuclear dimensions". Aggressive posturing from Russia in recent weeks has seen the state force 40 million of its citizens to take part in a massive defence drill to prepare them for a nuclear holocaust. Russia’s military announced it would run the country-wide drill in preparation of a large-scale war. The governor of St Petersburg clarified what bread rations people could expect should Russia come under attack – 300 grams for 20 days. The Kremlin also ordered nuclear capable missiles to be rolled into a base in mainland Europe, on an enclave near Poland called Kaliningrad. It comes as Russia vowed to shoot down any American fighter planes that attack President Bashar al-Assad's forces in Syria. Verbal jousting between the US, Britain and Russia over the issue of the ongoing bombardment of civilians in Syria are reaching a peak, with the very real possibility of genuine armed conflict between the nations taking place over the city of Aleppo. But one expert believes Putin's latest ramping-up of tensions is simply a tactic to prevent the US from interfering in Syria and to put the incoming American President on the back foot when they take office next year. Aleksander Baunov, an analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Centre, said the civil defence drills and the heated programming on television were a ploy to deter the US from interfering with Russia’s military campaign in Syria or responding too strongly to suspected Russian efforts to interfere with the US elections. He said: "They want to touch bottom and then to try to go up. “Any responsible politician…if you are responsible and experienced, it cannot start with further downgrading already bad relations if they are already at bottom.” 

:: 10-13-16 My Daily Informer :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Time To Pay Attention — In The Last 48 Hours, Humanity Just Moved To The Brink Of World War

Claire Bernish October 13, 2016

Months of disquieting and needless escalation between the United States and Russia over Syria and the Asia-Pacific theater has quickened feverishly to near outright hostility over the past 48 hours, and — considering semantics from both ends suggestive of antebellum blame-casting — it’s past time to pay attention. Indeed, though a few analysts still dismissively liken the tensions to so much blustery rhetoric, a growing number contend obstinate U.S. posturing about Russian aggression hasn’t been taken so lightly by President Vladimir Putin and his rapidly amassing allies. Additionally, it now seems the U.S. has backed its incessant finger-pointing with the subtle language necessary to undertake what could best, if ironically, be termed a ‘defensive first strike.’ While full-scale nuclear war might indeed be an outside possibility at this early date, the specter of full military engagement is quickly materializing on several fronts. To understand how we arrived so near this precipice, a series of events and statements over the previous month should be considered contextually with those of the last two days. After officially accusing the Russian government on Friday of attempting to influence the presidential election by hacking into and leaking documents from the Democratic National Committee servers — which, despite fast efforts to save face, undoubtedly tarnished the reputations of party members and nominee Hillary Clinton — President Obama offered an alarming statement Tuesday giving that accusation sharp teeth. “There are a range of responses that are available to the president and he will consider a response that is proportional,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest, quoted by Reuters, told media aboard Air Force One. “It is certainly possible that the president can choose response options that we never announce.” Speculation on an unnamed option largely centered around some form of cyber response, given the original accusation of hacking — however, it must be noted, two years ago the Obama administration deemed hacking an act of cyberterrorism and an utmost security priority — ‘terrorism’ being of critical relevance given the ongoing war against it. Notably, U.S. officials have previously asserted cyber attacks, in some cases, could elicit a military response. Without unassailable proof the Russian government hacked the DNC, any putative ‘response’ by the U.S. — proportional or not, cyber-oriented or not — would inherently be an aggressive first strike. Given the dispute over definitive evidence tracing the hack to Russia, any follow-through could conceivably be considered an act of war and/or terrorism. As such, an actual response of any nature has been posited unlikely — however, in consideration of last week’s belligerent remarks by U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, downplaying the potential for a response could be foolhardy. “The strategic resolve of our nation, the United States, is being challenged and our alliances tested in ways that we haven’t faced in many, many decades,” Milley told attendees of an annual meeting of the Association of the United States Army. “I want to be clear to those who wish to do us harm … the United States military — despite all of our challenges, despite our [operational] tempo, despite everything we have been doing — we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before. Make no mistake about that.” Milley went on to note Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran have “revised their own doctrines” and “are rapidly modernizing their military today to avoid our strengths in hopes of defeating us at some point in the future.” Quoting an unnamed senior Russian official, Milley advised “Russia can now fight a conventional war in Europe and win.” Whether or not Russian military would wind up fighting in Europe could be an entirely moot issue, as NATO has been amassing thousands of troops in Eastern Europe under the premise of protecting nervous nations from possible invasion. That assemblage of troops has been cited by Russia as posing an aggressive nuclear threat — which officials from the U.S. and its allies have laughed off as absurd. “Across the Atlantic, we’re refreshing NATO’s nuclear playbook — to better integrate conventional and nuclear deterrence, to ensure we plan and train like we’d fight, and to deter Russia from thinking it can benefit from nuclear use in a conflict with NATO,” U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter stated September 29. Russian Foreign Ministry officials responded by reiterating the perception of American aggression, as quoted by the Washington Post, “Carter’s statement means that if Russia comes under attack from U.S. allies, the Americans will be ready to back it and threaten to use their nuclear weapons against us. We would like to think that Washington understands the meaning of such statements and their possible consequences for international security and stability.” On Tuesday, a startlingly broad ‘recommendation’ published in Znak, Russian state officials and government workers were advised to immediately pull family members from study abroad programs — or any other endeavors — in Europe to return to the motherland. Translated by Zero Hedge and cited by Znak, political analyst Stanislav Belkovsky — albeit noting the controversy of the recommendation — said, in part, “this is all part of a package of measures to prepare the elites for some ‘big war’ even if it is rather conditional …” Also on Tuesday, Putin abruptly canceled a planned trip to Paris over the unraveling situation in Syria. Russia also issued two altogether unambiguous admonitions last Thursday, stating continued U.S. endeavors in Syria could lead to all-out war. “I would like to caution Washington’s colleagues to carefully consider the possible consequences of such plans,” said Russian Major General Igor Konashenkov in a statement, adding, “I remind U.S. strategists that air cover for the Russian military bases in Tartus and Hmeymim includes S-400 and S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems, the range of which may come as a surprise to any unidentified flying objects.” Observers rightly focused on the latter portion of the previous statement as a warning to the United States that Russia would not hesitate to strike first, ask no questions later — since it would be justified in defending ally Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s troops in a sovereign nation by request. However, the second warning — after the U.S. bombing of Assad’s troops in mid-September flared contention — constitutes, in actuality, the greater portent. Konashenkov, as Underground Reporter noted, “made clear Russia has a number of servicemen and aid workers in several communities in Aleppo, and that ‘any strikes on territories controlled by the Syrian government will create a clear threat’ to Russian citizens.” Dropping all pretenses, he added, “I am warning anyone, that after the U.S.-led coalition jets bombed positions of the Syrian government forces on September 17 in Deir ez-Zor, we will take all necessary measures to prevent other American ‘mistakes’ against the Russian military or other military facilities in the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic.” China, which had originally intimated support for Russia over the U.S. quest to oust Assad, has fomented its alliance in recent days. According to one analyst, there “is no question that there is correlation, coherence and coordination between Russia and China on the Syrian issue.” Russia has similarly indicated it would back China over the intricate territorial dispute in the South and East China Seas, particularly in defense against meddling by the United States and its ally South Korea — who will shortly deploy the U.S.’ Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) amid contention from both rival nations, as well as its citizenry. Although THAAD ostensibly could only be deployed in a defensive capacity, China and Russia criticize its proximity to the Chinese border as an act of direct aggression. On Tuesday the two nations announced plans to hold their second joint anti-missiles drill in 2017. According to a nationalist outlet cited by Reuters, Chinese Major Gen. Cai Jun stated, The United States’ blind development of anti-missile systems that exceed demand and its search for absolute unilateral military superiority inevitably damage global strategic equilibrium and gravely harm major powers’ strategic trust. One article could not do justice to the multi-fronted, labyrinthine conflict as it now stands, but with the current situation described by some as more dangerous than even the Cuban Missile Crisis — which nearly drew the U.S. into the first nuclear war — it would perhaps be advisable to focus on swiftly-unfolding international news rather than exhaustively debating lesser-evilism. As former Soviet Union leader and Nobel Prize-winner Mikhail Gorbachev cautioned Monday, I think the world has reached a dangerous point. Being prepared always is a perfect move towards living an enjoyable life. You need to prepare for both success and failure simultaneously. Being alert could save the lifestyle of your friends, relatively and more importantly your valuable life. Bad things that are anticipated to occur needs to be prepared for perfectly because they are inescapable, such as, global warming. So if you are looking for a perfect guide that will explain to you how to outlive catastrophes of all kinds, then never overlook “The Lost Ways” It is the best program for you. 


::  ::  :: More Truth  ::  ::  ::


This is absolutely brilliant. A surprising article from the New Yorker Magazine. This magazine has always been a left wing apologizer so this article is even more amazing. Don’t pass it up. The author. Roy Kaplan, is the political correspondent for Bloomberg and wrote extensively about Obama even before he was nominated.

"Who is Donald Trump?" The better question may be, "What is Donald Trump?" The answer? A giant middle finger from average Americans to the political, academic and media establishment. Some Trump supporters have simply had it with the Demo-socialists and the "Republicans In Name Only" class of people. They knew there wasn't a dime's worth of difference between Hillary Rodham and Jeb Bush, and only a few cents worth between Rodham and the other GOP candidates. Ben Carson was not an "establishment" candidate, but the Clinton machine would pulverize Carson; and the somewhat rebellious Ted Cruz (justifiably so) would have been tied up with natural born citizen lawsuits (as might Marco Rubio). The Trump supporters figure they may as well have some fun tossing Molotov cocktails at Wall Street and Georgetown while they watch the nation collapse. Besides - lightning might strike, Trump might get elected, and he might actually fix a few things. Stranger things have happened (the nation elected an [islamo-]Marxist in 2008 and Bruce Jenner now wears designer dresses.) Millions of conservatives are justifiably furious. They gave the Republicans control of the House in 2010 and control of the Senate in 2014, and have seen them govern no differently than Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.. Yet those same voters are supposed to trust the GOP in 2016? Why? Trump did not come from out of nowhere. His candidacy was created by the last six years of Republican failures. No reasonable person can believe that any of the establishment candidates [dems or reps] would have slashed federal spending, rein in the Federal Reserve, cut burdensome business regulations, reform the tax code, or eliminate useless federal departments (the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, etc.). Even Ronald Reagan was unable to eliminate the Department of Education. (Of course, getting shot at tends to make a person less of a risk-taker.) No reasonable person can believe that any of the nation's major problems will be solved by Rodham as she is simply the third verse of Obama’s waning swan song.

Many Americans, and especially Trump supporters, have had it with:

· Anyone named Bush

· Anyone named Clinton

· Anyone who's held political office

· Political correctness

· Illegal immigration

· Massive unemployment

Our out of control federal spending

Our National Debt that exceeds our GDP (Can you say Greece?)

· Phony "official" unemployment and inflation figures

· Welfare waste and fraud

Money being spent on Illegal immigrants

· People faking disabilities to go on the dole

· VA waiting lists

· TSA airport groping

· ObamaCare

· The Federal Reserve's money-printing schemes · Wall Street crooks like Jon Corzine

· Michelle Obama's vacations

· Michelle Obama's food police

· Barack Obama's golf

· Barack Obama's arrogant and condescending lectures

· Barack Obama's criticism/hatred of America

· Valerie Jarrett

· " Holiday trees"

.Hollywood hypocrites

· Cop killers calling themselves Black Lives Matter

· Gun confiscation

· Stagnant wages

· Boys in girls' bathrooms

. Whiny, spoiled college students who can't even place the Civil War in the correct century... and that's just the short list.

Trump supporters believe that no Democrat wants to address these issues, and that few Republicans have the courage to address these issues. They know that Trump is their way of saying, "Screw you, Hillary Rodham and all the Do Nothing Republicans!" The more the talking head political pundits insult the Trump supporters, the more supporters he gains. (The only pundits who seem to understand what is going on are Democrats Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell and Republican John LeBoutillier.

But America does not need a tune-up at the same old garage. It needs a new engine installed by experts - and Hillary Rodham is not a mechanic; she merely manages a garage her philandering husband abandoned. Trump is also not a mechanic, but he knows where to find the best ones to work in his garage. He won't hire his brother-in-law or someone to whom he owes a favor; he will hire someone who lives and breathes cars.

"How dare they revolt!" the "elites" are bellowing. Well, the citizens are daring to revolt, and the RINOs had better get used to it. "But Trump will hand the election to Clinton!" That is what the Karl Rove-types want people to believe, just as the leftist media eagerly shoved "Maverick" McCain down GOP throats in 2008 - knowing he would lose to Obama. But even if Trump loses and Rodham wins, she would be nothing more than a caretaker, not working to restore America's greatness but merely presiding over the collapse of a massively in-debt nation. A nation can perhaps survive open borders; a nation can perhaps survive a generous welfare system. But no nation can survive both - and there is little evidence that Hillary Rodham understands that. The United States cannot forever continue on the path it is on. At some point it will be destroyed by its debt.

Yes, Trump speaks like a bull wander[ing] through a china shop, but the truth is that the borders do need to be sealed; we cannot afford to feed, house, and clothe 200,000 Syrian immigrants for decades (even if we get inordinately lucky and none of them are ISIS infiltrators or Syed Farook wannabes); the world is at war with radical Islamists; and we cannot continue trying to spend our way out of debt. Is Trump the perfect candidate? Of course not. Neither was Ronald Reagan. But unless we close our borders and restrict immigration, all the other issues are irrelevant. One terrorist blowing up a bridge or a tunnel could kill thousands. One jihadist poisoning a city's water supply could kill tens of thousands. One electromagnetic pulse attack from a single Iranian nuclear device could kill tens of millions. Faced with those possibilities, most Americans probably don't care that Trump relied on eminent domain to grab up a final quarter acre of property for a hotel, or that he boils the blood of the Muslim Brotherhood thugs running the Council on American-Islamic Relations. While Attorney General Loretta Lynch's greatest fear is someone giving a Muslim a dirty look, most Americans are more worried about being gunned down at a shopping mall by a crazed [islamic] lunatic who treats his prayer mat better than his three wives and who is fool enough to think that 72 virgins are waiting for him in paradise.

The establishment is frightened to death that Trump will win, but not because they believe he will harm the nation. They are afraid he will upset their taxpayer-subsidized apple carts. While Obama threatens to veto legislation that spends too little, they worry that Trump will veto legislation that spends too much. You can be certain that if Hillary wins in November 2016 … [her] cabinet positions will be filled with the same people we've seen before. The washed-up -has-beens of the Clinton and Obama administrations will be back in charge. The hacks from Goldman Sachs will continue to call the shots. And American will continue her continuing decline as other great democracies in history.

If the establishment wins, America loses. Roy Kaplan

:: 10-13-16 Lexington Herald Leader :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

This presidential election is stressing America out

By Lesley Clark October 13, 2016 1:51 PM

WASHINGTON Stressed out by the presidential election? You are not alone. More than half of American adults report that the 2016 election is a “very or somewhat significant” source of stress, according to an online survey conducted by Harris Poll on behalf of the American Psychological Association. “We’re seeing that it doesn’t matter whether you’re registered as a Democrat or Republican – U.S. adults say they are experiencing significant stress from the current election,” said Lynn Bufka, the association’s executive director for practice research and policy. Stress is one thing Republicans and Democrats have in common: 55 percent of Democrats and 59 percent of Republicans say the election is stress-inducing. “Election stress becomes exacerbated by arguments, stories, images and video on social media that can heighten concern and frustration, particularly with thousands of comments that can range from factual to hostile or even inflammatory,” said Bufka. Indeed, nearly 4 in 10 adults said talking politics on social media causes stress. In addition, adults who use social media are more likely to say the election is a significant source of stress. While men and women are equally likely to say the election is a source of stress, younger voters and older voters are the most likely to be stressed out by the election. The association has some tips to deal with stress – beyond unplugging entirely until Nov. 9. It recommends reading “just enough to stay informed” and taking frequent news breaks. Also “avoid getting into discussions about the election if you think they have the potential to escalate to conflict,” the association says. “Whatever happens on Nov. 8, life will go on,” the association says. “Our political system and the three branches of government mean that we can expect a significant degree of stability immediately after a major transition of government.”

Read more here: 

:: 10-13-16 The Washington Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

People are so stressed by this election that the American Psychological Association has coping tips

By Colby Itkowitz October 13 at 5:36 PM

Even first lady Michelle Obama is feeling it. In an emotional speech Thursday, she shared that the Republican presidential nominee’s comments from the now infamous “Access Hollywood” video about groping women had “shaken me to my core in a way I could not have predicted.” Weeks before The Washington Post made that 2005 video of Donald Trump public, before Trump supporters were interrupting Hillary Clinton rallies by screaming that Bill Clinton is a rapist, before Trump told Clinton to her face that she should be in jail, Americans were already seriously stressed out by this election. In August, the American Psychological Association included a question in its annual Stress in America survey about this election. It released the results of that particular query on Thursday, and it found that more than half of U.S. adults, regardless of party, felt very or somewhat stressed by the election. [Meet the dad who made Trump and Clinton play nice at the close of Sunday’s debate] One can only imagine that what’s transpired over the past week has intensified the disgust, anxiety and disbelief felt by so many Americans. That the election is causing anxiety in more than half the country’s population puts it in line with other major life stressors, such as the economy, money or work, said Lynn Bufka, the APA’s associate executive director for policy. “It could be how negative the whole campaign is, the discord is particularly heated, we seem to be more polarized,” she said. “Also, we can work ourselves up over what the future president could do and if we get wrapped up in a lot of what ifs, that can make us really stressed, too.” As we noted in another piece about the very real “Election Stress Disorder,” Americans have been expressing serious anxiety about a potential Trump or Clinton presidency as far back as January. One element of the elevated stress people feel is that these candidates in particular evoke stronger emotions than most politicians. Not surprisingly, adults who use social media were more likely than those who don’t to say the election was bumming them out, according to the APA poll. “One of the challenges of being active in social media is that it’s always there,” Bufka said. “The social niceties seem to slip away when we’re online, we might be bolder or blunter, or it’s more readily misinterpreted. I urge people, walk away from it, it’s okay to not be plugged in all the time.” [Feeling anxious ahead of the debate? Here’s how to cope with ‘Election Stress Disorder.’] Notably, the demographic feeling it the most are seniors. Close to 6 out of 10 people over 71 years old said they were stressed by this election. Millennials were the next most angst-ridden group. “We do know that older adults typically report lower stress levels than younger generations, so it is particularly surprising to see the reverse is the case with the election,” said Vaile Wright, a Washington, D.C.-based psychologist and member of APA’s Stress in America team. “So we can only guess as to the reasons older adults might be more likely to report election stress — one possibility is that they are concerned about the future for their children and grandchildren. Another is that the issues that are particularly important to older Americans — Social Security, Medicare, prescription costs — aren’t being talked about that much by the candidates.” But, here’s the good news. For people who are willing to address their election stress head on, there are real-life skills to be harnessed. For instance, Bufka said people can learn how to more actively set boundaries in conversations. It’s okay to tell people that you’d rather not talk about the election and change the subject, she said. Or, if they can manage to keep their cool around a co-worker with opposing political viewpoints that could carry forward to other future interactions. [Yes, you can practice mindfulness and still stomach this presidential campaign] The APA outlined a few more ways to manage the stress of this election. And, if none of the below helps you cope, just keep reminding yourself there’s less than four weeks to go until it’s over. • If the 24-hour news cycle of claims and counterclaims from the candidates is causing you stress, limit your media consumption. Read just enough to stay informed. Turn off the news feed or take a digital break. Take some time for yourself, go for a walk, or spend time with friends and family doing things that you enjoy.

Avoid getting into discussions about the election if you think they have the potential to escalate to conflict. Be cognizant of the frequency with which you’re discussing the election with friends, family members or co-workers. • Stress and anxiety about what might happen is not productive. Channel your concerns to make a positive difference on issues you care about. Consider volunteering in your community, advocating for an issue you support or joining a local group. Remember that in addition to the presidential election, there are state and local elections taking place in many parts of the country, providing more opportunities for civic involvement.

Whatever happens on Nov. 8, life will go on. Our political system and the three branches of government mean that we can expect a significant degree of stability immediately after a major transition of government. Avoid catastrophizing, and maintain a balanced perspective.

Vote. In a democracy, a citizen’s voice does matter. By voting, you will hopefully feel you are taking a proactive step and participating in what for many has been a stressful election cycle. Find balanced information to learn about all the candidates and issues on your ballot (not just the presidential race), make informed decisions and wear your “I voted” sticker with pride. 

[  :: 2-2-13 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. Throughout the world right now peace is fastly disappearing, wars are rising up, trouble on the right hand, trouble on the left hand, etc..

:: 10-12-16 The Jerusalem Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Arab-Israeli Conflict

By TOVAH LAZAROFF \ 10/11/2016 14:04

Rivlin: Deniers of Jewish connection to Jerusalem are embarrassing themselves

Those who deny the Jewish connection to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount are simply embarrassing themselves President Reuven Rivlin, a seventh generation Jerusalemite, said on Thursday. Rivlin was speaking to children decorating the sukkah at his official residence, in advance of the projected UNESCO vote on a Palestinian resolution to rewrite history and ignore the fact that Jews made pilgrimages to the Temple in Jerusalem long before the advent of Islam. Rivlin recalled that when he was a boy prior to the establishment of the state, he used to accompany his father to the Western Wall before the recitation of the final Yom Kippur prayers, so that they could hear the shofar at the conclusion of the service. Today, he said, there is an attempt to silence the shofar. “It’s not that they don’t want to hear it. They just don’t want us there,” he said of Wakf and UNESCO attempts to remove the Jewish presence from Jerusalem. Social Equality Minister Gila Gamliel called the resolution “a combination of stupidity and antisemitism.” “Let me suggest a few more resolutions for UNESCO: The moon is made of cheese, Jews have horns, the Tanach doesn’t exist and UNESCO is a committee for denying Jewish heritage. Though, come to think of it, the final suggestion isn’t so crazy,” she quipped. Gamliel said it is not only ridiculous for UNESCO to try to deny the past, but it is also destroying chances for hope, peace and coexistence in the future. “Only the world and the Palestinians’ recognition of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish State will create hope for a shared future with respect between neighbors,” she stated. MK Tzipi Livni (Zionist Union) placed the blame for the UNESCO vote on the government, saying that Israel’s diplomatic situation has never been worse. “The resolution is shameful and meant to pressure Israel and try to erase the proven historic connection between the Jewish People and the Temple Mount and Western Wall,” she wrote on Twitter. In a letter to UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova, Livni argued that the resolution was turning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into a religious one. “This resolution, while claiming to maintain the administrative status quo, in fact changes it,” by bringing in a religious element, Livni wrote. “I sincerely feel that this resolution brings us no closer to a just and agreed-upon solution. We can argue and critique policies, but when it comes to the historical facts connecting the Jewish People to these holy sites, there can be no politics.” “It is my hope that the international community can arrive at an understanding of the distinction between religious, national histories and contemporary politics,” she concluded. Simon Wiesenthal Center Dean and Associate Dean Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper denounced the resolution, saying it “has one motivation – to try to erase the Jewish People’s age-old links to its holiest sites. “Should the resolution pass, it will have the immediate impact of encouraging and validating more Palestinian terror attacks on Israeli civilians,” they added. Gamliel said it is not only ridiculous for UNESCO to try to deny the past, but it is also destroying chances for hope, peace and coexistence in the future. “Only the world and the Palestinians’ recognition of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish State will create hope for a shared future with respect between neighbors,” she stated. MK Tzipi Livni (Zionist Union) placed the blame for the UNESCO vote on the government, saying that Israel’s diplomatic situation has never been worse. “The resolution is shameful and meant to pressure Israel and try to erase the proven historic connection between the Jewish People and the Temple Mount and Western Wall,” she wrote on Twitter. In a letter to UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova, Livni argued that the resolution was turning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into a religious one. 

:: 10-13-16 Reuters :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Thu Oct 13, 2016 | 9:33am EDT

Iran deploys warships off Yemen coast in the Gulf of Aden: Tasnim

Iran sent two warships to the Gulf of Aden on Thursday, the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported, establishing a military presence in waters off Yemen where the U.S. military launched cruise missile strikes on areas controlled by Iran-backed Houthi forces. "Iran's Alvand and Bushehr warships have been dispatched to the Gulf of Aden to protect trade vessels from piracy," Tasnim reported. The U.S. military strikes were in response to failed missile attacks this week on a U.S. Navy destroyer, U.S. officials said. Iran's key regional rival Saudi Arabia accuses Tehran of providing support to the Houthis, a charge the Islamic Republic denies. Tasnim said the Iranian ships will patrol the Gulf of Aden, south of Yemen, which is one of the world's most important shipping routes. 

:: 10-13-16 Breaking Israel News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Shin Bet Busts Arab-Israeli ISIS Terror Cell

By Andrew Friedman October 13, 2016 , 4:30 pm

Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) said Thursday that security forces have arrested 16 Arab citizens of Israel suspected of supporting ISIS. The detainees were arrested during the month of September and are residents of the city of Taybe. Prior to being arrested members of the group are suspected of trying to set fire to the local soccer stadium in order to prevent a concert scheduled for last months Eid al-Adha holiday. Under questioning, the suspects told Shin Bet interrogators that the arson attempt was inspired by ISIS ideology – that is to say, that they believe that live music is “immoral” and “against Islam”, and violates the principles of the “Islamic State.” According to the Shin Bet statement, one detainee, Amir Jabara, was arrested in Turkey last April after trying to join ISIS in Syria via the Turkish border. Another, Ibrahim Sheikh Yusuf planned to leave in several months to join the terror group. Investigators said Ibrahim built a pedal-powered glider to leave Israel. The group is also suspected of planning to smuggle weapons from the Tulkarm area via a tunnel into israel in order to plan for “judgement day”, on which they believe they will have to fight “heretics.” The weapons were to be hidden underneath Ibrahim’s house; activists planned to extend an existing tunnel across the security wall near Taybe. Security forces discovered and investigated the tunnel, which had only been dug for several meters.

Read more at 

:: 10-13-16 Al jazeera :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Pakistan delays Asia Bibi blasphemy appeal

Top court adjourns final appeal in case of Asia Bibi, on death row since 2010, after a judge recuses from bench. Pakistan's Supreme Court has delayed an appeal into the country's most notorious blasphemy case against a Christian mother on death row since 2010, after one of the judges stepped down. Thousands of security troops had been deployed in the capital, Islamabad, as the court prepared to hear a final appeal in the case of Asia Bibi on Thursday. The court did not immediately set a new date for the appeal. But the threat of violence was largely abated when one of the three-judge bench, Justice Iqbal Hameed ur Rehman, told the court he had to recuse himself from the case. "I was a part of the bench that was hearing the case of Salmaan Taseer, and this case is related to that," he told the court. Taseer, a liberal provincial governor, was shot dead in Islamabad in 2011 after speaking out for Bibi. His assassin, Mumtaz Qadri, was hanged earlier in 2016 in a step welcomed by liberals in the country, but which brought hardliners into the streets calling for Bibi's death. A senior police official said that up to 3,000 forces were deployed in the capital on Thursday. "Security is very tight in Islamabad all around today. Additional troops have been deployed on checkpoints and city junctions in general. There is also deployment of paramilitary force Rangers and FC [Frontier Corps] on some additional points," a police source told AFP news agency. Up to 100 officers, many in riot gear, were stationed outside the Supreme Court as Bibi's lawyer and husband arrived for the hearing, with more throughout the city. "I have made my preparation, we are very hopeful," Bibi's lawyer Saif-ul-Malook told AFP earlier. Blasphemy is a hugely sensitive issue in Pakistan. Rights groups complain that the controversial legislation is often abused to carry out personal vendettas, mainly against minority Christians. Bibi was convicted and sentenced to hang in 2010 after an argument with a Muslim woman over a bowl of water. Her supporters maintain her innocence and insist it was a personal dispute. But successive appeals have been rejected, and if the Supreme Court bench upholds Bibi's conviction, her only recourse will be a direct appeal to the president for clemency. She would become the first person in Pakistan to be executed for blasphemy. The repercussions for minorities, human rights and the blasphemy laws will be "tremendous" if that happens, said Shahzad Akbar, a human rights lawyer. Observers have warned of possible violence if the conviction is overturned, with some calling the case a battle for Pakistan's soul as the state walks a line between upholding human rights and appeasing hardliners. 

[ :: 3-30-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.  for if you put the man in that I desire for you to put in, you will have good times until you go.  If not it shall be hell here on earth and you will think that you have been left behind, but that is not so.  

For I have told you before this that this would be the last President, that this would be the last President as you know a President, therefore listen, pay attention, for it is your life it will affect, but it doesn’t need to affect it in a bad sense it can affect it in a good sense.  You can be the victors, you can be the overcomers, but hear, hear what I, your Father God, has to say. 

For truly my people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge and I, your Father God, have said that if you lack anything ask and I, your Father God, will give it unto you.  And therefore, I am giving wisdom and knowledge when it is asked of me, but many times my people do not ask of me, but they make their own choice and their own decisions, and therefore, they have to pay the consequences and the price for those decisions.  Even as in the days of old when the children of Israel said let us, let us choose and they chose and the one that they chose was not the one that I chose and they ended up defeated because of that.  So you see my people when you follow after me and follow after my word and when you seek my wisdom, when you seek my counsel you are able to make the right decisions.  The decision that will bring you victory, the decision that will make you the overcomer, the decision that will help you and you see how the people decided in the past and they made the wrong decision and they paid the consequence because of that.  So seek my face, call upon my name, ask for wisdom, ask for knowledge and I will give unto you that wisdom, I will give unto you that knowledge, I will show you exactly who to vote for, I will show you what to do.  For truly if you follow after my ways and my wisdom you shall have victory, saith the Lord.

:: 10-13-16 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Shocking Claims: This Extreme Chaos Scenario Would Explain UN Troops And Vehicles Prepositioned Across America

October 13, 2016 By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

The new story over at the Washington Free Beacon tells us that according to former US Senator from Wisconsin Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton might issue an executive order on guns here in America if she is somehow voted into the White House in November. Coming not out of the mouths of 'conspiracy theorists' but a man attempting to win back his old Senate seat, Feingold might confirm on hidden camera as seen in the 2nd video below part of what we learn from a Norwegian United Nations soldier here in America as shared in the new SQAlert republished below: they may be going door to door taking American's guns and they already had the lists of names and addresses. As Mac Slavo tells us over at SHTFPlan in covering this important SQAlert, imagine what might happen here in America if Donald Trump rightfully and lawfully won the US election due to his overwhelming popularity compared to his opponent when suddenly, the Department of Homeland Security and the Obama government take control of the election, claiming it was widely hacked by 'hostile actors' believed to be Russians and decide to throw out the lawful vote. Can you imagine there possibly being a peaceful resolution to such a Republic-ending scenario? From Slavo: We have previously noted that recent allegations of Russian hacking could mean the Department of Homeland Security will be charged with protecting the Presidential election in November. In fact, as Joe Joseph noted in his latest daily news update, the Department of Defense and U.S. military may be joining DHS to ensure a fair electoral process. Coupled with previous reports that “independent” United Nations observers will be overseeing this year’s vote suggests there may be some legitimacy to the shocking claims you are about to read. Consider what might happen should a particular candidate be elected to the Presidency, only to have the Department of Homeland Security, DoD or United Nations overturn the vote. And when we say “particular candidate” we are, of course, referring to Donald Trump. With well over 50 million Americans supporting him for the Presidency, if he were to win a decisive victory and then have that victory overturned because of national security issues, one can only imagine the outcry, protests and riots to follow. The narrative has already been created at the very highest levels of America’s political hierarchy and it is not so hard to envision a scenario such as this playing out. Should such an event come to pass, would the “transition” be peaceful? According to Christopher Greene of AMTV as heard in the 1st video below, Americans will die after a Hillary Clinton gun ban. Warning us that we're now witnessing 'death by a thousand cuts', Greene confirms to us why we're now living in one of the most dangerous times in American history. Almost half of the country knows that the Clinton family is rotten to the core and crime ridden for over 30 years. Yet there they sit, posed to become leaders of the free world once again. As Greene tells us, Clinton is well aware that nearly 50% of Americans hate her criminality and corruption while every day, she plays it off as if the American people are the ones who have the problems. Greene tells us that since power grows out of the barrel of a gun, what might someone do who wants absolute power and has been corrupt her entire career? Follow Feingold's warning to get the answer: she's going for the guns via executive order. During the fundraiser, which was hosted by Clinton friend and donor Amy Rao at her home in Palo Alto, California, a Project Veritas journalist spoke with former Senator Feingold and his donors about gun control. When asked what Hillary Clinton would do about the Second Amendment, Feingold said without hesitation, “Well, there might be an executive order.” Feingold, who claims the majority of our state ‘believes there should be background checks on internet and gun show’ sales of firearms, fails to clarify that there already are background checks on both internet and gun show sales of firearms – continuing to push the “gun show loophole” narrative. Referring to guns in America, Rao herself tells O’Keefe on camera that Hillary wants to ‘shut it down’, saying, “If we can get guns away from everyone in this country, she’ll close the loopholes (to) get rid of assault weapons, she will rid being able to buy you know, unlimited bullets, she’s gonna make all that stop.”

October 13, 2016

Shocking Claims: This Extreme Chaos Scenario Would Explain UN Troops And Vehicles Prepositioned Across America


By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

The new story over at the Washington Free Beacon tells us that according to former US Senator from Wisconsin Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton might issue an executive order on guns here in America if she is somehow voted into the White House in November. Coming not out of the mouths of 'conspiracy theorists' but a man attempting to win back his old Senate seat, Feingold might confirm on hidden camera as seen in the 2nd video below part of what we learn from a Norwegian United Nations soldier here in America as shared in the new SQAlert republished below: they may be going door to door taking American's guns and they already had the lists of names and addresses. As Mac Slavo tells us over at SHTFPlan in covering this important SQAlert, imagine what might happen here in America if Donald Trump rightfully and lawfully won the US election due to his overwhelming popularity compared to his opponent when suddenly, the Department of Homeland Security and the Obama government take control of the election, claiming it was widely hacked by 'hostile actors' believed to be Russians and decide to throw out the lawful vote. Can you imagine there possibly being a peaceful resolution to such a Republic-ending scenario? From Slavo: We have previously noted that recent allegations of Russian hacking could mean the Department of Homeland Security will be charged with protecting the Presidential election in November. In fact, as Joe Joseph noted in his latest daily news update, the Department of Defense and U.S. military may be joining DHS to ensure a fair electoral process. Coupled with previous reports that “independent” United Nations observers will be overseeing this year’s vote suggests there may be some legitimacy to the shocking claims you are about to read. Consider what might happen should a particular candidate be elected to the Presidency, only to have the Department of Homeland Security, DoD or United Nations overturn the vote. And when we say “particular candidate” we are, of course, referring to Donald Trump. With well over 50 million Americans supporting him for the Presidency, if he were to win a decisive victory and then have that victory overturned because of national security issues, one can only imagine the outcry, protests and riots to follow. The narrative has already been created at the very highest levels of America’s political hierarchy and it is not so hard to envision a scenario such as this playing out. Should such an event come to pass, would the “transition” be peaceful? According to Christopher Greene of AMTV as heard in the 1st video below, Americans will die after a Hillary Clinton gun ban. Warning us that we're now witnessing 'death by a thousand cuts', Greene confirms to us why we're now living in one of the most dangerous times in American history. Almost half of the country knows that the Clinton family is rotten to the core and crime ridden for over 30 years. Yet there they sit, posed to become leaders of the free world once again. As Greene tells us, Clinton is well aware that nearly 50% of Americans hate her criminality and corruption while every day, she plays it off as if the American people are the ones who have the problems. Greene tells us that since power grows out of the barrel of a gun, what might someone do who wants absolute power and has been corrupt her entire career? Follow Feingold's warning to get the answer: she's going for the guns via executive order. During the fundraiser, which was hosted by Clinton friend and donor Amy Rao at her home in Palo Alto, California, a Project Veritas journalist spoke with former Senator Feingold and his donors about gun control. When asked what Hillary Clinton would do about the Second Amendment, Feingold said without hesitation, “Well, there might be an executive order.” Feingold, who claims the majority of our state ‘believes there should be background checks on internet and gun show’ sales of firearms, fails to clarify that there already are background checks on both internet and gun show sales of firearms – continuing to push the “gun show loophole” narrative. Referring to guns in America, Rao herself tells O’Keefe on camera that Hillary wants to ‘shut it down’, saying, “If we can get guns away from everyone in this country, she’ll close the loopholes (to) get rid of assault weapons, she will rid being able to buy you know, unlimited bullets, she’s gonna make all that stop.” The story over at CBS Las Vegas from August quite interestingly tells us all about the huge list of Clinton associates who have died mysteriously. As the author of the story tells us, she's not a 'conspiracy theorist' but the huge list of names in the 'Clinton dead pool' is just TOO coincidental. Sharing with us a list of 47 names not including the 4 men who died in Benghazi, CBS's author concludes her story: Not the kind of person I want in charge of my country. While Hillary is more than happy to arm Syrian rebels and ISIS terrorists as heard in the 3rd video below, some of them who likely have been 'trojan horsed' back into America to attack Americans, she doesn't want you to have guns and her lengthy background detailed by Greene proves it. If voted into office, might she soon use the countless UN vehicles already being staged in this country as well as foreign/UN troops as detailed in the SQAlert below videos to attempt to disarm the American people as all dictators do before they assume complete control? As Greene tells us in the 2nd video, everything that we have as Americans is now at stake. Our freedoms, our liberty, our Republic, our livelihoods and our dignity. Those who long ago set out to take down America have succeeded mightily at its destruction. Only Donald Trump and the 'awakened' American people are standing in between the satanic globalists and their long held plans for the destruction of America. In the final video below our videographer talks with us about Hillary's gun control strategy including taking a look at why a Clinton presidency will allow the UN to finally complete the enforcement of their arms trade treaty here in America and why Americans need to do our very best to make sure she never makes it to the White House. From Adolf Hitler to Joseph Stalin to Pol Pot to Mao Tse-tung, all of the 'gun control experts' agree, gun control works great, especially if those instituting it are seeking genocide upon those they might find 'deplorable'. Might Hillary, the United Nations and the globalists soon attempt to disarm the law-abiding American people as detailed in the SQAlert below? While we're unable to verify this account as we weren't there, as we have detailed within this story, all signs point towards a very rocky road ahead for America as we count down what could be our final days. NORWEGIAN - U.N. SOLDIER SPILLS THE BEANS: He said that they were going to be going door to door taking guns, or shooting to kill. They already had the lists of names, and address's. This does not come from an hi level source. Just an everyday average Joe. But a guy that works in the same industry, that always gave a hard time about the tin hat-stuff, recently returned from a Great Divide Concert. At which a gentleman just passing by, stopped to mingle with this group of people. They had a couple of drinks, and this guy states, he likes America, he likes the people. He wished he could dance like the Americans. Laugh. He states he had been fighting beside US troops over past 6-7 years. And this is why I feel I need to tell someone over here in the states a lil something. He said he was from Norway. And he would be back in 3-4 months as a part of UN troops.. He said there was nothing he could do. But felt compelled that he needed to say something, just to let such good know what is coming. He said that they were going to be going door to door taking guns, or shooting to kill. They already had the lists of names, and address's I have no reason to not believe the words from acquaintance. it actually pretty much freaked him out. He is rather overwhelmed from the conversation. From his reaction, and as long as we've been acquainted, I have no reason not to believe what he was told. I just wanted to pass this on to someone with the means to possibly get the word out. Thank you sir, Jay 

:: 10-13-16 Ray Gano :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Hillary Wins Equals WWIII – The Fishbowl Effect and Our Imploding Military

By Ray Gano - October 13, 2016

Folks, this is no longer an election for Democrat or Republican, and to state bluntly, third parties at this point are an absolute joke. What many people need to understand is that we are literally voting for true freedom or absolute slavery. As some of you know, I do not live in the US at this moment, and this provides me a very unique vantage point of the US. See, we in the US maintain from what many people call “The Fish Bowl Effect.” What this means is that we as US Americans live in a world which we tend to only see out. From our vantage point inside the fishbowl we have a great place, a really pretty castle, sparkly stones and a really cool bubble emitting treasure chest. We look around our little world and that is all we see. But when someone else looks at you, they see the truth, that we are in fact living in a fishbowl. Simply put, we can see out, but it is really difficult to for us to see in. Not saying that it can’t be done, its just hard. This is where my vantage point comes in. See, because of where I am located, it is interesting to watch what is going on in the fishbowl. What amazes me is that there is news and information that I often wonder why the US is not reporting on certain things? I ask myself at times, “WHY in the world is the US Administration doing that? “ I then do a face palm and shake my head. “Don’t they see it?” … I then answer myself, “ No they don’t because they live in a fishbowl.Mischaël Modrikamen the founder of the people’s party, an anti-globalist party in Brussels stated the following … “Mister Trump, we have this in common – we speak the truth,” Modrikamen says. “We name things. Of course the politicians and media elites will never forgive us for that. But ordinary citizens, the voiceless, are not fooled or abused. Mister Trump, make America Great Again. You are an example for many of us here in Europe.” Here is a plea from Mischaël Modrikamen telling the American people why they need to vote for Trump and fully endorsing Donald Trump as President.

SPECIAL NOTE – This was filmed 11 days before the tragic ISIS attacks 3/22/2016 in Brussels. Please, take the time to watch this message from Brussels…


Bill Still of The Still Report produced this short video showing a commercial from Mischaël Modrikamen pleaing with the American public to vote for Donald Trump and why.


As I have stated, this is no longer a common election where if we do not like what is happening, we just wait another 4 more years. Fellow Americans, if Hillary Clinton wins, I truly believe that this will be the last election our nation will see, and many are starting to wake up and realize that as well. OK… to continue the smoke and mirror job sure there might some form of elections. Think back on this for a moment. Some of you may remember the false sugar coated elections that took place in communist countries, you know where there is only one name on the ballot and you get to check that box. The next day news reports that elections have been held and “Lenin / Stalin / Khrushchev wins by a land slide.” Gee… no kidding, theirs was the only name on the ballot. That is what we will see in the American election arena’s future if Hillary wins. Contrived elections where the prisoners elect their favorite guards. Here is another person from Russia that is telling America to not vote for Hillary, WHY? Want to hear it from the horse’s mouth? Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a former Russian politician stated the following… “Americans voting for a president on Nov. 8 must realize that they are voting for peace on Planet Earth if they vote for Trump. But if they vote for Hillary it’s war. It will be a short movie. There will be Hiroshimas and Nagasakis everywhere.” Friends, if Hillary gets in, she will continue the utter destructive foreign policies that Obama has put in place. Listen, I am going to say something here that I know many will not like to hear. When it comes to eliminating ISIS and fighting this cancer, we are on the wrong side. It is the US that basically created ISIS due to a vacuum we created in the Middle East. The current administration is hiding behind the fact that we did not have to vacate the Middle East without leaving some sort of presence to keep radical Muslims in check and in a weakened state. Instead Obama leaned on Bush’s draw down plan and pushed the dates and numbers up. Had we pulled out at a slower place and not as high numbers, ISIS may not have been created. Today, we are now on the wrong side and the Obama’s policy of nation building and changing the political environments in the Middle East have shown to have a horrible detriment to not only the Middle East, but also to the world. ISIS now has strong footholds in over 30 countries in the world and making very strong inroads in the US due to our severely weak immigration policies and leveraging refugee loop holes. We are the ones now supporting ISIS, where before we were on the right side in fighting against them. Our militaries Special Operations / Forces’ motivation and esprit de corp is at an all time low. Why? Because at one time we were the guys wearing the white hats fighting against this evil cancer. Today our Spec Ops teams are now being FORCED to train these stinking Haji dirtbags and we are assisting them in overthrowing Assad in Syria. The media tells you that these “rebels” are fighting for their freedom. Wrong, these “rebels” are ISIS looking to over throw yet another country so that they can establish a Middle East caliphate ruled via draconian Sharia law. You know Russia? They are fighting against ISIS and helping Assad. Want to know something else? Read the following… American Civilians And Veterans Are Fighting ISIS In Syria And Iraq Many fighters have joined anti-Islamic State militias out of a sense of moral duty. Tens of thousands of foreign fighters have streamed into Syria and Iraq in recent years to add even more numbers to the prolonged and brutal conflict. Many of these people are thought to have joined up with ISIS militants or other extremist groups, such as the al Qaeda-linked Jabhat al-Nusra. But some of them have gone to the Middle East to fight against those groups. The report finds that an estimated 108 Americans from 31 states have joined militant groups that include the YPG, a Syrian Kurdish militia, and Iraqi peshmerga forces, as well as various Christian militias in Iraq and Syria. Texas, Ohio and Colorado are the most represented states relative to their populations. About two-thirds of the American fighters have some background in the U.S. armed forces. Others, however, are ordinary civilians, and found groups like the YPG that are willing to accept inexperienced volunteers.

Source – 

If you know some of our Special Ops & Intel fighting men and women, they can tell you the real facts of what is going on and they will clearly tell you that we are fighting on the wrong side. Folks, this is why if Hillary wins, there is a very good chance that she will drag us into WW III. Sooner or later she or Obama will step it up a notch and show Russia that we have become the aggressor, and you know what? Russia is not going to sit by and let us be the aggressor, they will do something about it and protect themselves. OK, there are a lot of things I do not like about Russia, but in this situation, Russia is wearing the white hat and we are not. I also want to make completely clear that I am not making ANY SPECULATIONS here in this article when it comes to popular bible prophecy ideas. I am not looking at global situations through the lens of Bible Prophecy at this moment. In fact if you want to know my thoughts on this, please take the time to read my in-depth article titled – The Mystery of Rosh that I wrote back in 2009. Continuing on… Wikileaks reported the following… Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton sent an email to her campaign chairman John Podesta in 2014, who was then-counselor to President Barack Obama, that said Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both giving financial and logistical support to the Islamic State and other extremist Sunni groups, according to a recent Wikileaks release. Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional ground operation. “While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote. Source – 

 It is in fact reported that … “the Clinton Foundation’s donor list, Saudi Arabia gave between $10 million and $25 million. But the foundation reported the Saudi money in December 2008.”

Source – 

We have learned that Hillary (& Bill), while serving in public office for the past 30 years has increased her wealth to over 200 million via the Clinton Foundation. She has also contributed a lot of $$$ to the Clinton Foundation, which is a non-profit and thus she is able to take the “donations” off on her taxes. And here she accuses Trump of leveraging the legal loop holes? Now, because of this payola, Hillary’s tune has changed and she is now against Russia and for the “rebels” in Syria. Russia is the bad guys, Russia is hacking the DNC (which there is no proof at all). She throws out there about arming Kurds, but intel tells us that the Kurds are suffering badly at the hands of ISIS and getting little to no support at all. In fact, most of the support the Kurds are getting is from former US military now are our mercenaries and Christian militias that have been forming to fight ISIS in the Middle East. Our military is imploding on itself due to the massive “political correctness” campaign that is taking place within the ranks. The radical gay agenda is literally being shoved down what is left of our good, moral and freedom loving fighting men and women and they are exiting the military left and right. Listen, I have a number of contacts in the contract military community (mercenaries) Many of these men and women love the US and see the real enemy for who they are. They know that the US military is being decimated at an alarming rate. They also know that if Hillary wins, things will get much worse than it currently is at this present time. If Hillary wins, we will see not only a drastic reduction in our military due to her policies, but you will see what is left of these good men and women exit the military at a record rate. That is if they are not chased out, like what is happening currently. Just look at the solid battle experienced Generals and high ranking officers that are being given their walking papers. OH, and guess who these great officers are supporting? Yep, you guessed it Donald Trump. They see what is happening. They know because they have the battle experience and they know who the real enemy is. What we need to understand is that she has been bought and paid for by the global elitists through the oil sheiks of the Middle East. She does not care about the freedom loving people of the United States, in fact we are just a bunch of deplorable’s and irredeemable. It is interesting to remember that Hitler thought of the Jews in the very same way… a bunch of deplorables and irredeemables. So what did he do? He enacted the “Final Solution” and over 6 million Jews died and in fact, 11 million people died in the concentration camps due to Hitler’s policies. Think that she would not do the same? I keep telling people that the US did not build over 300 FEMA camps all for nothing. In fact Hillary helped support NDAA and has joked about putting people in “re-education camps.” Friends, there is a lot more at stake in this election than in elections past. The United States is at a major crossroads; in fact, the world is there as well. Those who love freedom and see it slipping away are getting behind Donald Trump. That is why I am standing with Trump as well. Believe it or not, Hillary is a bought and paid for globalist by the power elite globalists. She will do their bidding and she does not care what state the United States is in. As long as she gets power and all that comes with it, she does not care and has sold her soul to the devil so that she can have it. We have to put aside these petty pious ignorant ideas that these “No Trump” people are saying, if we do not show up in force, we will lose our nation and it will then be the blood of our Grandchildren that will have to fight to regain those freedoms again. If you want yet more reasons, please take the time to read what my wonderful wife has written. She is part of the Prophezine ministry and when the right topic comes across her desk, she will often write a pretty incredible article that knocks it out of the park. Here is her article – Why I Can Vote With a Clear Conscience – By Tracye Gano Show up on November 8th and vote Trump, it will make a difference. 

:: 10-12-16 Real Clear Politics :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia

Posted By Tim Hains On Date October 12, 2016

Green party presidential candidate Jill Stein: Donald Trump is less scary on foreign wars, because he wants to work with Russia. JILL STEIN: It's important to look at where we are going. It's not just a moment in time, but where has the strategy of voting for the lesser evil you will taken us? All these times you have been told to but for the lesser evil because you didn't want the wars, or the meltdown of the climate, or the offshoring of our jobs, or the attack on immigrants or the massive bailout for Wall Street, that is actually what we have gotten. By the droves. Because we with public interest allow ourselves to be silent and voted for the lesser evil. But the lesser evil doesn't solve the problem. The Obama administration, even with both houses of Congress, actually did all of these fossil fuel emissions. "All of the above" gave us some renewable energy but it completely amplified and intensified our film production, which has been incredibly destructive to the climate. The wars have gotten bigger, we are not bombing seven countries. It is important to not just look at the rhetoric but also look at the track record and the reality is the lesser people and greater people is a race to the bottom, and even Donald Trump in the right wing extremism grows out of the policies of the Clintons, in particular Nafta, which sent our jobs overseas and Wall Street deregulation, which blew 9 million jobs up into smoke. That is what is creating this right wing extremism. A vote for Hillary Clinton isn't going to fix it... It is enow Hillary Clinton that wants to start an air war with Russia over Syria by calling for a no fly zone. We have 2000 nuclear missiles on hairtrigger alert. They are saying we are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been. Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria. I sure won't sleep well at night if Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary Clinton elected. We have another choice other than these two candidates who are both promoting lethal policies. On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia. He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia. 

:: 10-10-16 The Hagmann Report :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Steve Quayle on The Hagmann Report 10/10/16

By Douglas J. Hagmann - October 10, 2016

The World is the Courtroom and God is the Judge – America & the West on Trial, Facing Judgment & Sentence

It’s likely that you’ve heard the question that if you were arrested and charged with the crime of being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you? The earth is God’s courtroom and He is the Judge. We will stand before Him for what we have done, or have not done, as history is etched into the timeline of God. Events are taking place in rapid progression, outpacing the headlines and our ability to report them. Within these events exists biblical prophecy. While prophecy cannot be changed, we will nonetheless be held accountable for our actions or inaction during these most historic times. Our own actions and beliefs, as well as those actions and beliefs we have used to lead others astray, will be recorded in heavenly transcripts. Geopolitical events that portend global conflict seem overshadowed by the spectacle of the presidential debates that reflect our spiraling descent into lawlessness and immorality. Many people, including Christians are continuing to search for political solutions while ignoring deeply rooted spiritual problems. An entire generation appears to have surrendered their spirituality in favor of immediate earthly gratification. Meanwhile, the majority of the Christian leadership have acquiesced to sinful tolerance. A “new” gospel has replaced the old for many, particularly to those who have succumbed to their own delusions birthed from earthly hubris and defiance. For it is easier to coexist in sin than to live in righteousness. The contemptible will be held in contempt and judged harshly. The very events that have been the subject of biblical prophecy seem to be upon us. Our earthly actions have been and continue to be recorded like transcripts of a Divine trial. There are many people who continue to doubt the existence of a heavenly trial, sentencing and judgment. Others err as they acknowledge the venue but not the terms, for their delusion has devoured their existence as they adhere to a perverse doctrine born from the hubris of man absent from God. There is a war in heaven that is being manifested on earth. There is an all-out assault being waged against the followers of Jesus Christ in America and throughout the West. America, once the beacon of Biblical Christianity, has become weakened from within. It has been long prophesied in the Book of Revelation:

7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. [KJV] Join Steve Quayle tonight on The Hagmann Report as he provides a geopolitical update through the prism of biblical prophecy. 

:: 9-29-16 FINextra :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Biometrics: The future of payment authentication?

29 September 2016 | 7201 views | 2

If you could authenticate online payments with a press of your finger, a quick selfie or an iris scan instead of using a traditional password, would you? Advances in payment technology not only have the potential to improve payment security, but also user experience. Biometric measures bypass passwords, which are becoming increasingly complex and are susceptible to being forgotten or stolen. According to a 2016 study by Visa, over two thirds of European consumers want to use biometric identification when making payments. Let's face it, nobody wants to type a password containing at least 10 upper and lower case characters and a special symbol every time they want to authorise a payment! So let's take a closer look at what biometrics can offer! Payment at your fingertips! A report from Juniper Research entitled “Top 10 disruptive technologies in fintech: 2016” listed biometrics as the number one technology to transform ecommerce. According to Visa’s 2016 study, fingerprint recognition was voted the most favorable biometric authentication method by consumers due to ease of use and security. Fiserv’s report found that fingerprints trump passwords in terms of security in the eyes of consumers: 41% of consumers stated they would feel secure using a password as an authentication method to confirm their identity when using a mobile app, compared to 62% for fingerprint technology, thus proving that this technology holds huge potential for the payment security market! For some time now companies such as Apple Pay, Android Pay and Square Cash, a peer-to-peer payment app, have been using fingerprints to add an extra layer of security to their payment processes for user peace of mind. Pay with a selfie? MasterCard has unveiled its plans to simplify the online shopping experience for its card holders with a new feature involving a popular pastime of many: taking a selfie! The company’s programme, called MasterCard Identity Check, enables users to verify purchases using their fingerprint or a photo of their face. In order to pay with a selfie, MasterCard requires users to firstly upload a photo which is converted into a binary string using facial recognition authentication technology. To authorise all future payments the user simply snaps a quick selfie, and if it matches with the original upload, the payment is validated. Some experts have questioned the security of such a method. MasterCard has insisted that it has security checks in place to detect suspicious behaviour such as detecting the user's location and where the purchase is being shipped to. Furthermore, the app requires the user to blink, in order to ensure that it is a live photo of the user, and not a fraudster taking a photo of a photo! MasterCard has explained that the new service will only be used for the moment in certain contexts where additional authentication is required. However, with a number of companies expressing interest in payment by selfie, including e-commerce giants Alibaba and Amazon - who has reportedly filled a payment for payments via selfie, this area appears set to experience a lot of investment and development in the near future! What else is out there? Other methods are being developed including voice, heartbeat and vein recognition technology. Advancements are also being made in relation to behaviour biometrics. Sensors are already in most smartphones like the accelerometer, gyroscope, and of course GPS, which are possible to use in conjunction with other biometric measures to reinforce security. There are numerous startups working on behavioral sensors, such as Biocatch, AimBrain and Plurilock. As biometrics develop, so do security concerns. Sensors can be spoofed by duplicates and biometrics are not a binary measurement but are based on the probability of a match, leaving them more vulnerable to error. For the moment biometrics work best when used in association with other authentication methods. Although they cannot yet be used as a stand alone authentication, they are a good match as part of a holistic approach to payment authentication, especially with regards to improving user experience! It is clear that the biometric industry is working hard to innovate and meet consumers demands and whatever your stance on the subject, The Minority Report is looking less and less like a fiction film! 

[ :: 2-8-02 At the altar after the pm service (second word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. a terrible dark cloud has covered the earth, sickness, pain, suffering, bloodshed, drought, hurricanes, tornadoes, hail, fire, famine, pestilences, heartaches and sorrow, the anti-christ rising to power and fame. Oh, what a day that has now come.

:: 10-7-16 Forbidden Knowledge TV :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Mysterious New Blood Bacteria Seems Like Nanobot Bioweapon

October 7, 2016

Dr. Nick Delgado is a researcher of biochemistry and endocrinology, with a special focus on anti-aging medicine. In this clip, Dr. Delgado speaks to me about a disturbing new phenomenon that he’s been observing for about a year and a half. When he examines patients, Dr. Delgado puts a drop of their blood beneath a microscope. After 40 years of studying blood morphology, he has never previously seen or heard of the 1-micron-sized* tiny “tadpoles”, which he’s been seeing lately, which school like fish in large groups around the blood cells, moving in unison and changing rapidly in direction. The people carrying these “tadpoles” all describe having a persistent cough. These “tadpoles” somewhat resemble a class of microbe called flagella. A common example of a flagellate bacterium is the ulcer-causing Helicobacter pylori – however, these “tadpoles” behave differently from anything he’s ever seen. Dr. Delgado isn’t sure whether these are a “super” bacteria or exactly what they are but he’s encountered cases in Northern- and Southern California, as well as in Florida. After I suggested that if they were not readily identifiable as microbes, that these might be some sort of bioweapon, he remarked that he was open to this possibility. Earlier this week, a colleague of his had confirmed that he’d observed the exact same thing – so it truly appears that we may be looking at an emerging and pervasive phenomenon. As Dr. Delgado described their movement to me, I was reminded of the way swarms of tiny drones called Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) can maneuver, as they are radio controlled using “swarming” software, which keeps the movements of dozens of MAVs in perfect unison. These “tadpoles” are of course much, much smaller than MAVs. The idea of nanorobots or “nanites” also popped into my mind. At 1 micron in size, these “tadpoles” are at the large end of the nanoscale, the size of a complex nanobot, per Robert Freitas, in his book, ‘Nanomedicine’. As Dr. Delgado described the distribution of cases in California, it reminded me of Morgellon’s disease, a controversial condition described by officialdom (the crooked CDC) as “delusional parasitosis.” Morgellon’s is nonetheless addressed with sincerity by the Mayo Clinic and certainly by its sufferers, many of whom believe that there might be a connection between chemtrails and Morgellon’s. Dr. Delgado will be showing images of these strange new blood “tadpoles” in his upcoming October 16th Immortality Webclass, a free webinar he’s conducting with fellow leading anti-aging experts, that’s all about revolutionizing the way participants think about and experience aging, with critical scientific insights into the findings of recent research and how to safely use biochemistry to improve all areas of human performance in advanced ages. 

:: 10-9-16 Strange Sounds :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Aquatrails: New toxic chemtrails of the sea

By Strange Sounds - Oct 10, 2016

Chemtrails were first spotted in our skies. Now governments launch new toxic aquatrails in the oceans. Odd emissions had indeed been spotted floating behind large vessels, which did not dissipate normally according to Kelvin wake patterns. Oceanographers at the Wyoming Institute of Technology have dubbed these dispersals “Aquatrails”. Despite the fact that our oceans cover over 70% of our planet, nuclear meltdowns and toxic oil spillages like Fukushima would seem to occur more often than can be explained away by malpractice. A pattern has been emerging regarding the locations of these ‘accidents’. An award-winning online community named THE WELL reported in the 1990’s that odd emissions had been spotted floating behind large vessels, which did not dissipate normally according to Kelvin wake patterns. Oceanographers at the Wyoming Institute of Technology have coined these dispersals “Aquatrails”. Other Scientists were quick to dismiss the reports citing the usual ‘conspiratorial’ cry similar to chemtrails. Were Aquatrails overlooked until the 90’s? Health officials recently recorded the incidence of a complex compound known as monomethyl mercury in our seas. Mysteriously, something is converting element mercury into a more dangerous methylated form. This bioaccumulative toxicant was measured in different types of fish like mackerel, bass, and cod. This toxic substance decreases attention span and lowers the IQ’s especially of young people, which results in an inability to grasp the enormity of the issues facing them in the future. This is clearly an issue that demands further study. It is criminal for our governments to deny this crisis and it is unethical for the media to partake in the global cover-up. As citizens, we need to pressure Congress and our local officials to investigate. In order to succeed, we need to make aquatails as important as chemtrails in the mainstream consciousness. Candidates running for higher office, including the 2016 presidential election, must be called out on this controversy and they must state on record whether they support America’s Constitutional prerogatives or if they are beholden to the New World Order’s Agenda 21. 

[ :: 12-31-09/1-1-10 New Years Eve Service (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. For the disasters that shall take place are many, the flooding shall be far greater than in times past, the mudslides far greater than in times past, the earthquakes shall be more numerous and far greater than in times past. The tornadoes, oh the savageness of the tornadoes that shall rip across the land, the straight winds, the hurricanes, the forest fires, the volcanoes shall erupt, the rising of the sea level that will be marked not in inches but in feet. etc.. 

:: 10-10-16 KOMO news :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Three earthquakes recorded off Oregon coast, no tsunami warnings issued

by Staff

SALEM, Ore. -- A 4.9 and 4.2 earthquake shook off the coast of Oregon at around noon on Sunday, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The first quake was measured at 4.2, striking about 200 miles from the coastline at around 11:50 a.m. Sunday. The second 4.9 quake hit at about 12:10 p.m. in roughly the same area. A third earthquake was reported at around 7:20 a.m. several miles to the northeast of the other two quakes. The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center has not issued any sort of warning or alert from the earthquake. 

:: 10-9-16 Activist Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Australia Considers Precrime Indefinite Detention

October 9, 2016

The Washington Post reports: The change will upend a centuries-old legal principle that prisoners are automatically released when their sentences end. Even the United States, which has kept suspected terrorists in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without trial for over a decade, doesn’t allow prisoners on U.S. soil to be held after their sentences end. “No other democracies in Europe or North America do this,” said Elaine Pearson, the director of Human Rights Watch in Australia, in an interview. “The definition of terrorism is pretty broad in Australia and includes the financing of terrorism and recruitment, which is one of the reasons we’re worried about this.” Last year the government of New South Wales trained police to shoot and kill suspected terrorists instead of negotiating with them. Following a hostage situation at Lindt Café in Sydney the Herald Sun reported: If we have learned anything from the Lindt Café siege, it’s that terrorists cannot be treated like other criminals. They cannot be placated, reasoned with, or exhausted into submission. Law enforcement authorities around the world have long recognised that those waging jihad are a different breed, requiring different strategies. It should be noted the man responsible for the hostage crisis, Man Haron Monis, was not a political terrorist. He was schizophrenic and described himself as an Iranian intelligence official, a political activist, a spiritual healer and expert in black magic, an outlaw biker, and a Muslim cleric. The police killed Monis and two hostages during the siege. 


[ :: 10-17-10 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. truly darkness, darkness is growing darker and darker and darker, war is being prepared, war is being made ready. Watch Russia, watch Turkey, watch China, watch Iran, watch Pakistan, watch Saudi Arabia, for they are not your friends nor have they ever been your friends.  They are not my friends, saith your Father God, for they shall wage war against me in the last days, these are the last days. etc..

:: 10-10-16 International Business Times :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Why Russia's westernmost point is the front line of the new Cold War

Baltic neighbours have expressed concern about deployment of nuclear-capable missiles to Kaliningrad.

By Tom Porter October 10, 2016 14:45 BST

The Russian enclave of Kaliningrad has once again become the focus of Nato concerns after Moscow confirmed that it was deploying several nuclear-capable Iskander missiles to the region. Located 300km to the west of Russia and bordered by the Nato states of Lithuania and Poland, the province is the westernmost point of Russia's military presence. Residents must travel through at least two European states using a special permit to reach Russia. Seized by the Soviet Union in 1945, the region operated as a closed military zone after the Iron Curtain divided Europe between communism and capitalism. The territory had previously been part of Germany, when the port was called Koenigsberg, and was famed as the birthplace of 18th-century philosopher Immanuel Kant. Fierce fighting between Soviet forces and the German army saw much of the town obliterated in the closing months of the Second World War with the German population fleeing or expelled after the Russians took control. The region was of key strategic value for Russia, housing the base of its Russian fleet in the port of Baltiysk and as its only ice-free European port in Kaliningrad itself. During the Soviet years the region was economically heavily dependent on the military and on agriculture. After the collapse of the USSR in 1991 Soviet military might withered, and the region's economy nosedived. Organised crime gangs battled for control, and unemployment and poverty soared. In 1996 the Russian government granted the region special tax advantages to encourage investment, and its fortunes were revived, with the region seeing an unprecedented economic boom. The region's economy took another hit during the 2008 financial crisis. Under the second presidency of Vladimir Putin Russia has attempted to reassert its military might, and Kaliningrad has become a front in renewed tensions between the West and Russia. In 2013, Russia positioned Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad in response to the creation of a missile defence shield by the West. Lithuania's President Dalia Grybauskaitė claimed in 2015 more of the missiles had been deployed. The actions have provoked anxiety in Kaliningrad's neighbours. Poland, Estonia anjd Lithuiania have protested against the deployments, with Poland building six watchtowers to survey its 200km border with Kaliningrad in 2015. 

:: 10-9-16 Daily Mail :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Russia moves nuclear-capable missiles within range of Berlin and Warsaw as tensions escalate between the nation and the West

Iskander missiles sent to Kaliningrad are in range of major Western cities

Polish officials have described the move as being of the 'highest concern'

Germany’s foreign minister said situation more dangerous than Cold War

By Emily Kent Smith for Daily Mail Published: 18:20 EST, 9 October 2016 | Updated: 19:57 EST, 10 October 2016

Russia has moved nuclear-capable missiles near to the Polish border as tensions escalate between the world’s largest nation and the West. The Iskander missiles sent to Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave on the Baltic Sea between Nato members Poland and Lithuania, are now within range of major Western cities including Berlin. Polish officials – whose capital Warsaw is potentially threatened – have described the move as of the ‘highest concern’. Germany’s foreign minister said the situation between Russia and the West was more dangerous than during the Cold War. ‘It’s a fallacy to think that this is like the Cold War. The current times are different and more dangerous,’ Frank-Walter Steinmeier told German newspaper Bild. German diplomat and security policy expert Wolfgang Ischinger said there was ‘considerable danger of a military confrontation’. He added: ‘This danger has not been as strong in decades and the confidence between West and East has never been so low.’ Iskander missiles have a range of up to 440 miles (700km). Their deployment in Kaliningrad comes amid deep divisions between Moscow and the West over Syria, where Russia and the regime of Bashar al-Assad have been bombing rebel-held districts. Russia has shrugged off concerns about the Iskander missiles, saying they have been deployed in Kaliningrad before and are there now as part of a routine military drill. But Estonia’s chief of defence Lieutenant General Riho Terras said he believed Russia was attempting to dominate the Baltic Sea. He said: ‘In the long term, Russia’s wish is to bring the Baltic Sea and the passages leading to it more and more under its control, and to control it much like it does the Black Sea.’ Kaliningrad, annexed from Germany in 1945 and geographically separated from the rest of Russia, is of vital strategic importance to Moscow. It is the westernmost part of Russia and is home to its Baltic Fleet, as well as fighters and helicopters. Lithuania’s foreign minister, Linas Linkevicius, said: ‘The deployment not only increases tensions in the region, but also possibly violates international treaties which limit deployment of ballistic missiles of range of over 500 kilometres.’ He said the matter would be discussed in a Nato-Russia Council meeting. A US intelligence official said the deployment could be Russia expressing contempt towards Nato. US secretary of state John Kerry has said Russia and the Syrian regime should be investigated for war crimes over civilian deaths in Syria.

Read more: 

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[ :: 10-17-10 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. truly darkness, darkness is growing darker and darker and darker, war is being prepared, war is being made ready. Watch Russia, watch Turkey, watch China, watch Iran, watch Pakistan, watch Saudi Arabia, for they are not your friends nor have they ever been your friends.  They are not my friends, saith your Father God, for they shall wage war against me in the last days, these are the last days. etc..

:: 10-6-16 Front Page Mag :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Obama Aids Iranian Nuclear Terror

New information exposes old lies about the nuclear deal.

Daniel Greenfield October 6, 2016

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

Senator Obama opposed naming Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps a terror group even while it was closely involved in organizing attacks against American soldiers in Iraq. Then, as part of his dirty deal with Iran, he secretly sent a fortune in foreign cash on airplanes linked to the IRGC. And, as another part of the secret ransom deal with Iran, he lifted UN sanctions on Bank Sepah. The United States has gone after plenty of banks for aiding terror finance, but Bank Sepah is somewhat unique in that it is a financial institution actually owned and operated by Islamic terrorists. Bank Sepah is an IRGC bank. The IRGC, despite Obama’s denials, is an Islamic terror group with American blood on its hands. It is to Shiite Islam what ISIS is to Sunni Islam. And even the Democrats know it. After the Khobar Towers bombing, which killed 19 Americans, President Clinton sent a message to the leader of Iran warning that the United States had evidence of IRGC involvement in the attack. More recently, Secretary of State John Kerry admitted that the IRGC have been “labeled as terrorists” when discussing how the Shiite terror organization will benefit from Obama’s sanctions relief. Bank Sepah however had been sanctioned for something bigger than terrorism. The scale of bombings it was involved in could make the Khobar Towers attack seem minor. Sepah had been sanctioned for being "involved in nuclear or ballistic missile activities." Among other activities, it had helped Iran buy ballistic missile technology from North Korea. Iran’s nuclear weapons program would only be halfway complete if it gets the bomb. It also needs missiles to be able to strike Israel, Europe and eventually America. That’s where North Korea and Bank Sepah come in. Bank Sepah helps keep Iran’s ballistic missile industry viable. By delisting it, Obama aided Iran’s ballistic missile program just as he had earlier aided its nuclear program. Obama’s holistic approach to the Iranian bomb is to help the terror state assemble the physical components it needs to become a nuclear power. And the truth is hidden within the secret deals. There are secret deals that Obama made with Iran that we already know about. There are secret deals that we suspect exist. And there are secret deals whose existence we are not even aware of. Obama rang in Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year, by assuring the Rabbis on a conference call that they didn’t need to worry about Iran nuking anyone because “every pathway to a nuclear weapon is now closed off.” That’s funny because last year he was still claiming that under his deal in 13 years Iran’s breakout time will, “have shrunk almost down to zero.” If every pathway to a nuclear weapon is closed, how could Iran possibly have zero breakout time to make the occasion of the bar mitzvah of his dirty nuclear deal? And which Obama do you believe? Try neither. The secret document revealed earlier this year by the AP showed that Iran would be able to get its uranium enrichment in gear after 11 years and more than double its enrichment rate. What happens by the thirteenth year? Then Iran gets a blank check on centrifuges. That’s what Obama really meant. Then breakout time to the bomb drops from a year to six months. Or even less. Until it hits zero. But Ernest Moniz, Obama’s sniveling Secretary of Energy, assured the AP that it wouldn’t be a problem because Iran would only be allowed to store 300 kilograms of low-enriched uranium. He lied. Even as Obama was assuring the Rabbis of how thoroughly Iran was complying with his deal, new revelations were emerging of how he had helped Iran fake its compliance with the deal. That’s the sort of thing you go to hell for. But it’s a little too late for Obama to worry about that. The issue was simple. Obama wanted to lift sanctions on Iran. But Iran was not in compliance with even his mostly worthless agreement. So Obama decided that it was time to help the terror state fake it. Iran was only allowed to keep 300 kilograms of low-enriched uranium. Obama agreed to upgrade that amount to “unknown quantities”. How much is an “unknown quantity”? Like the rest of Iran’s nuclear program, we don’t know. Low-enriched uranium, even in unknown quantities, doesn’t sound that scary. Except that according to a former U.N. weapons inspector, it can be used to produce highly enriched uranium. And that’s how you go from zero to a mushroom cloud over your city. And then there are the large hot cells that Iran was allowed to keep running. Secretary of Energy Moniz didn’t just lie to the AP. Lying to the media is practically an Obama indoor sport. He told the same lie in his testimony to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee. Senators were assured that Iran would be allowed to keep "only 300 kilograms of low (3.67 percent) enriched uranium hexafluoride, and will not exceed this level for fifteen years." Iran didn’t have to wait 15 years to exceed that amount. Or even 15 minutes. Obama gave them a pass on it right out of the gate. But Moniz wasn’t a rogue liar. He was telling the lie that he had been told to tell. At the Rosh Hashana conference call with the Rabbis, Obama repeated the false claim that Iran had “shipped out 98 percent of its enriched uranium”. He told the lie even though the truth had already come out at the beginning of September. The 98 percent or 300 kilogram limit had been bypassed by him. No one challenged him or called him out on his lie. And that is the problem. Obama has lied about the Iran deal from the very beginning. And that’s not about to change. The fairy godmother of Iran’s enrichment was Hillary Clinton. The “breakthrough” in the negotiations took place when she accepted some Iranian nuclear enrichment. And then it was just a matter of determining how much enrichment would take place officially and how much would take place unofficially that would be officially ignored or covered up by our own government. That is how we got to the ticking atomic time bomb. Obama hasn’t just turned a blind eye to Iran’s race to the bomb. He has empowered and enabled all elements of it from its nuclear program to its ballistic missile program. He has ensured that Iran would have the money, the manpower and the resources to become a nuclear power. He directed elements of our intelligence services and military to prevent Israel from striking Iran’s nuclear program. He even aided its core terrorist organization and its ballistic missile program. This isn’t an error. It’s not cowardice. It’s treason. A coldly calculated plan to turn Iran into a nuclear power is coming together. On the other end of it lies the horrifying death of millions. Why would Obama and Hillary do such a horrifying thing? The American scientists and spies who helped the Soviet Union get the bomb believed that they were making the world a better place by limiting our ability to use nuclear weapons. Their treason almost led to the end of human life on earth. The Iran deal is the second great wave of nuclear treason of the left. And the full truth is yet to be told. 

[ :: 2-2-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. the whole world can tell you right now that Russia and North Korea has declared war on the United States of America.  The whole country can tell you an invasion is coming, the whole country can tell you the cashless monetary system is ready to start, the banks will have no money, the mark of the beast will be here.  But I am trying to protect you by placing one that can protect you, but even if that is not so and cannot be, I will still protect you and take you through this time safely. etc    

:: 9-28-16 The Federalist :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

How North Korea Could Make Good On Its Promise To Erase The United States

It wouldn't require a nuclear weapon. And it may be more imminent and real a threat than most Americans are willing to realize.

By James H. Hyde September 28, 2016

Many people complacently ignore the threats posed by the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK)—as if it’s a fourth-world country run by a chubby, raging lunatic who needn’t be taken seriously. But those of us who keep our binoculars on North Korea (albeit from Google Earth or declassified maps) know that ignoring Kim Jong Un is an error we may not live to regret. What kind of an attack could Kim hurl at us? One that could kill between 75 percent and 90 percent of our population, relegating Americans to endangered society status and transporting those surviving back in time to the mid-1800s—if we’re lucky. Most people, especially those who don’t know who Kim Jong Un is, are unaware that he has a nuclear arsenal, albeit a minuscule one (, a site that closely monitors North Korea, estimates that “…a stockpile of sufficient fissile material for approximately 20 bombs by the end of this year and a capacity of adding approximately 7 per year makes the DPRK claim sound plausible”). This arsenal poses no serious threat to the U.S. But it’s not the threat of a nuclear missile attack that concerns Dr. Peter Pry (who heads the Taskforce for National and Homeland Security, and for which I volunteer some of my time), ex-CIA director James Woolsey, Center for Security Policy Founder and President Dr. Frank Gaffney, and others who closely monitor nuclear developments in the DPRK. We are all deeply concerned about the horrendous potential for Kim Jong Un to use just one device—one which poses a threat far more devastating than a full-on Russian nuclear attack. North Korea Wants to Wipe Out the U.S. ‘All At Once’ On September 9, the North Koreans conducted their fifth nuclear test, this one the biggest of five, registering a 5.3 on the Richter scale and estimated at 20 to 30 kilotons. In this case (as with an earlier test conducted in January), it may be difficult for our radiation sniffing-planes to pick up much fallout. The January test produced seven to 10 kilotons, yet we didn’t pick up any alarming release of radiation. Why? Many believe it was not a conventional nuclear test for two reasons: first, both of the latest detonations were likely hydrogen-based devices, making them thermonuclear. Second, the kinetic yield (radioactivity) was sacrificed to increase gamma ray emissions. Why is that important? Because the DPRK isn’t interested in making several of our cities glow. They want to take us out “all at once.” After the January test came this from North Korea’s news service, KCNA: “The scientists and technicians of the DPRK are in high spirit to detonate H-bombs of hundreds of Kt (kiloton) and Mt (megaton) level capable of wiping out the whole territory of the U.S. all at once…” [Emphasis added] While that may seem like the typical bellicose, hyperbolic venom Kim Jong Un tosses our way, it’s not. This time, his saber rattling may have him tossing the sheath away. What would send us to oblivion “all at once?” An EMP, or a Super-EMP. If you understand what an EMP is, you’re ahead of the game. Unfortunately, few in this country have the faintest idea what it is, and probably don’t care. What’s An EMP, And What Can It Do? EMP stands for “electromagnetic pulse,” and it is truly devastating to anything and everything that has a microchip in it or is part of the crumbling, antiquated, and hopelessly snarled convergence of wires we call our electric grid. The grid comprises three major sections: the Eastern Interconnection, which provides the nation with 75 percent of its power; the Western Interconnection; and the Texas Interconnection, all of which hopelessly lack the kind of hardening we need to protect them. An EMP-based weapon would do a good deal of damage. But if the last two DPRK tests involved thermonuclear devices, they could become Super-EMPs. When those are put aboard a satellite and detonated 300 miles above the center of the U.S., just one of them would impale technology addicts on a painful and sharp withdrawal spike, while tossing our urban and suburban populaces into abject panic and chaos. As I write this, the DPRK has two satellites flying above us on a south to north trajectory. It’s the same satellite route the Soviets used during the Cold War. Back then, the prevailing wisdom was that if the Soviets to launch their nukes at us, the missiles would come over the North Pole. In response, we stationed our missile defense systems in the north. Since the Soviet Union shattered, that defensive posture has not changed, leaving no defense in the south or along the Eastern Seaboard. While no data stream has been detected coming from either “earth-based satellite” (according to the DPRK), it is not known whether nuclear devices are aboard those satellites or whether they are “test vehicles.” In response to those devices and one recent rocket engine test, the U.S. and U.N. have showered Kim Jong Un with sanctions that hurt members of the ruling class, including him. The North Korean people are beyond impoverished, and live with the government’s hand around their throats. According to, “Kim [Jong Un] was quoted as ordering officials and scientists to complete preparations for a satellite launch as soon as possible, amid the enemies’ [the U.S.] harsh sanctions and moves to stifle the North.” And Joel Wit, founder of the 38 North website, notes that “This test is another important development pointing to the first launch of a bigger, better space vehicle to place satellites in higher orbits, which could happen in the not too distant future.” Kim’s request for a satellite in higher orbit is particularly troubling: it means he could pack an EMP or Super-EMP device on it and put it into orbit over the U.S. Unless we take swift measures to “harden” our electric grid and military assets—and soon—America could become an endangered society. An EMP or Super-EMP detonated at an altitude of between 25 and 300 miles (the higher the better) would be cataclysmic. The Apocalyptic Power of the Super-EMP The detonation itself would not harm us physically. The kinetic energy (radiation) would dissipate harmlessly in space. The increased gamma rays, however, would race toward earth in three waves, milliseconds apart. Electrons in air molecules in our atmosphere would be knocked out by gamma rays in massive numbers that then rush earthward. Once they came in contact with the ground, they would take out transformers in substations. Hyper-electrical pulses would snake along our electric lines, destroying transmission and distribution technologies as they go. The immediate effects would be withering: planes in flight would start falling from the skies. Chemical plants that control hazardous materials would no longer be controlled, imperiling all who live nearby as their computerized technology fails. Most cars built after 1974 would lose power. Trains, especially those operating on electrified tracks, would come to a halt. Tens of thousands would be stuck in elevators nationwide. Planes in flight would start falling from the skies. But the biggest long-term threat manifests as the “Rule of Threes.” We can hold our breaths for three minutes. We can go without water for three days, and without food for three weeks. City populations living in skyscraper apartment buildings would no longer get water pumped to them. Bottled water would disappear from supermarket shelves on the first day. Most submarkets are stocked for only three days worth of consumable inventory, especially meats and fresh vegetables. Perhaps most vulnerable in the transmission and distribution system are huge transformers that are extremely hard to replace, and (as with so many other industries) no longer manufactured here. They now come from Germany and South Korea. Each is unique and designed to fit in a specific place within substations, of which nine are critical. These transformers are complex power regulators that take a year to build and cost $10 million. They must be shipped here and off-loaded to special trucks that can accommodate them. Each one can weigh over 400 tons. A standard 18-wheeler won’t do the job. Their tires would burst. Plus, gasoline would become extremely scarce. Oil refineries would cease to function, so finding enough gas to power these huge trucks would be nigh impossible. We have some backup transformers here, but nowhere near enough to replace all of the damaged ones hit by an EMP. Estimates are that it would be at least a decade before we could replace enough transformers to get at least some electricity flowing. Only the Preppers Will Survive But failure of the grid presents a secondary and even more devastating effect, one that would threaten even those in the hinterlands. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, “There are 60 commercially operating nuclear power plants with 100 nuclear reactors in 30 states in the United States. Of these plants, 36 have two or more reactors.” Nuclear power plants are as dependent on power from the grid as any other energy-consuming entities. The Nuclear Regulatory Agency mandates that a one-week supply of diesel fuel be sustained at each nuclear plant to fuel the backup generators. But it’s useless if there are any computer chips running those generators. The only other possibility is to use battery backups for as long as possible. When those fail, even reactors taken offline need to be bathed constantly in cold water. Without generators or batteries to pump that water, there’s no way to cool the reactors or the spent-fuel-rod pools. Once the water boils off, it’s Fukushima times 100. Regardless of how it’s done, few would survive an EMP attack. All of those reactors will melt down with the spent-fuel rods. Hydrogen will build up in the tops of the reactors, as it did in Fukushima, and if ignited would cause the same explosions we saw in Japan. With the Jet Stream flowing from west to east, radioactivity would cover the nation. Regardless of how it’s done, few would survive an EMP attack. If we were to be hit by a Super-EMP, only those who have amply prepared by having renewable water supplies and food stores will have a chance. As a measure of how seriously this threat is taken by the military, consider that NORAD has scurried back under the protection of Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado. They are currently spending a $70 million allocation to further harden the facility. With Kim as unpredictable as he is, we’d be wise to do all we can to convince our federal and state governments to protect our electric grid. If we fail to do so, the consequences could be cataclysmic.

James H. Hyde has been a journalist since 1983. He covers politics, national security (threats to the U.S. electric grid), and terrorism. He won a Jesse H. Neal Award in 1986, has served as managing editor of three magazines, written two syndicated columns, authored one book and is working on a series of others. Follow James on Twitter @jameshhyde and Facebook james.h.hyde1. 

:: 10-9-16 King World News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

ALERT: China Now Possesses Up To A Shocking 12,000 Tonnes Of Gold And Last Week’s Takedown Was The Desperate BIS

October 09, 2016

With continued uncertainty in global markets, today the man who has become legendary for his predictions on QE, historic moves in currencies, and major global events, told King World News that China now possesses up to a shocking 12,000 tonnes of gold. 40% Of World Production Sold In Paper Gold Market Last Week Egon von Greyerz: “Eric, I want to make it very clear that the selling we saw last week was another desperate attack by the BIS and some central banks, together with the bullion banks, to manipulate the gold market lower. We saw over 40% of annual production of gold being sold last week, which is 1,000 tonnes. And this is despite the physical market remaining very strong, Eric, which I will talk about in a little while.. Continue reading the Egon von Greyerz interview below… In Volatile Markets, Is Wealth Preservation King? In a King World News interview I spoke with the man who predicted the Swiss National Bank would experience staggering losses and that the Fed would also experience massive losses that will destabilize the global financial system! His company is the only one in the world offering a precious metals investment service outside the banking system, with direct ownership and full control by the investor. He has also become legendary for his predictions on QE, historic moves in currencies, and major global events. To find out what he and his company can do to help answer that age old question for you CLICK HERE. Egon von Greyerz continues: “Obviously, the sellers had no physical gold to sell so they conveniently dumped all this gold in the paper market. It would have been totally impossible for them to do this trade in the real gold market, which is only physical of course. Western Central banks have no physical gold of any quantity to sell. This is why they must fabricate paper gold out of thin air in order to dump it in the market. In total these banks officially have around 23,000 tonnes of gold. I doubt they even hold half that figure. No central bank ever has an official audit of their physical gold. Last time the US gold was audited was in the 1950s. A proper audit would not just reveal that these bank have a lot less gold than they officially declare, but it would also expose the true position of their gold lending or leasing. Most of the gold they have left has been leased to the market in order to depress the price. But this gold no longer stays within the LBMA bullion banks like in the past. No, instead the intelligent buyers of gold today like China, India and Russia, take delivery. This means that the leased gold now becomes a paper claim with no chance of getting physical gold back. So what has happened in the physical market in recent years is that central banks have continuously depleted their physical stock by selling and leasing their gold with most of the buying having taken place in the East. This transfer from West to East is the reason why Western governments and central banks are desperate to keep the gold price down. Official gold is no longer held in “safe” Western hands that are easy to control. Instead the gold has been acquired by nations and people who understand the value of gold. Russian & Chinese Gold Reserves Increasing Dramatically These new gold buyers also know that it is the best protection against the total destruction of paper money that is taking place in our debt infested world. And the countries that are now buying gold are not sellers. The Russian government for example has been expected by the West to sell their gold every time they are under economic pressure. But if we look at the chart below, the picture looks very different. Since 2006, Russia’s gold reserves have gone up almost 4X. China Already Possesses A Staggering 8,000 – 12,000 Tonnes Of Gold! But since China has produced and imported over 11,000 tonnes of gold since 2009, it is assumed that the official gold holdings are substantially higher than the 1,600 tonnes reported, maybe as high as 8,000 – 12,000 tonnes. Everyone Is Buying This BS Western Paper Gold Smash So whilst the West is dumping paper gold, the East is buying physical. And this is exactly what happened last week, Eric. Gold fell almost $100 on selling of massive amounts of paper gold. But something very different happened in the physical market. Mutual funds and ETFs bought over 30 tons of physical gold last week. In total these funds have increased their holdings this year by over 46% or 900 tonnes to 2,840 tonnes. As we can see in the chart below, the buying by these funds has been strong all year. When gold corrected by $100 in May, their gold holdings continued to increase. Eric, as some speculative gold buyers are becoming nervous due to another manipulative attack in the paper gold market, the wealth preservationists see this as a real opportunity to add to positions in physical gold. Last Week Was A Desperate Attack By BIS & Western Central Banks We are seeing the same thing in our company with continued strong buying from investors who understand that what we have just seen is another desperate attack by the BIS and some central banks together with the bullion banks. When this group dumps half a year’s physical gold production in a very short time, they know that they temporarily can drive the price down. Don’t Worry, Gold Will Soar Hundreds Of Dollars In A Single Day As we know, banks can manufacture unlimited amounts of worthless paper gold and sell it to buyers who don’t understand the massive risk they are taking. Because at some point, holders of paper gold will realize that they can’t get rid of it at any price. At that time the price of physical gold will go up by hundreds of dollars or more in a day. So, Eric, my message is that last week’s takedown is absolutely nothing to worry about even if we see a bit more pressure. We have seen these manipulations time and time again in this bull market, which so far has lasted 16 years and is likely to last at least another 5 years and possibly a lot longer.” ***KWN has just released the extraordinary interview with Dr. Stephen Leeb, where he discusses the gold and silver smash, what to expect next and much more, and you can listen to it by CLICKING HERE OR ON THE IMAGE BELOW. ***Also just released: China’s Surprise Move And Why Fear Will Power The Gold Market To Unimaginable Heights CLICK HERE. 

:: 9-29-16 Christianity Today :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

What Politics Can (and Can’t) Do to Prevent Another Holocaust

Good governments can slow the spread of genocide, but they can’t stop people from becoming genocidal.

Eric Miller/ September 29, 2016

Today, when we think Holocaust, we imagine “extravagant anti-Semitism,” says Timothy Snyder, a Yale historian. But what if the Holocaust wasn’t propelled by racism so much as by politics? That’s the claim Snyder makes in Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning, and it’s an unsettling one. A society might take measures to reduce racism. But it can hardly purge itself of politics. So Snyder’s proposal comes as a blow to our tacit historical assumptions—and to our sense of moral immunity. While the particular political circumstance that made the Holocaust possible may have expired, Snyder warns, its kind lives on; in fact, we know it well. Snyder awakens us to the political dimensions of the Holocaust with an array of little known facts. To wit: prior to World War II ten times as many Jews lived in Poland as in Germany; most Germans, in fact, didn’t know any Jews and had to be taught how to recognize them. Ninety-seven percent of the Jews the Nazis killed lived beyond pre-war Germany. Only 700,000 were citizens of Germany’s allies. Three-quarters of France’s Jews survived; 80 percent of Italy’s. What does this mean? It means—and this case Snyder persuasively builds, chapter by chapter—that while Nazi politics were thrusting the Final Solution forward, the political structures of other states proved able to stop it. “Nazi malice stopped at the passport,” he concludes. “They did not proceed with killing Jews until states were actually destroyed or had renounced their own Jews.” Even Nazi Germany, with all its vaunted bureaucratic precision and efficiency, found itself stalled in the face of structures designed to protect human beings. “Bureaucracies in Germany,” writes Snyder, “could kill Jews only when bureaucracy-free zones elsewhere had been established.” How did these the stateless regions emerge? Snyder begins his explanation in the realm of worldview, showing how mind-controlling ideas led to state-destroying ideology. The “tangible and total truth” upon which Hitler constructed his ghastly program was that humans are governed by biology, the law of survival. Race wars against race. Each race must embrace this end or face extinction at the hands of those more dedicated to what Hitler understood to be life itself. So why did the Jews so merit Nazi enmity? What made them so uniquely malign, so distinct from all other races caught up in the battle for the “black earth,” Snyder’s image of finite fertility? It was precisely their refusal to submit to this (supposed) final law of nature and to instead seek a public life ordered according to universal moral principles—principles that rebuked the urge for ruthless domination. The Form of Destruction At first Hitler and his inner ring weren’t sure how they would marginalize the Jews. Early on their thoughts ranged to Siberia, a possible site for a collective mass exile, where the Jews could be enslaved for Aryan purposes. In fact, the vast region east of Germany was attractive for many reasons, particularly as Germany was trying to secure a future on a continent still quaking with the aftershocks of World War I. Hitler and his cohort took inspiration from Europe’s own imperial past, discovering “source mythologies,” Snyder writes, terrifyingly, in historic conquests of North America and Africa. What the indigenous peoples of the Western hemisphere had been to the Spaniards and the English, the Slavs became for the Germans: unworthy keepers of a bountiful land and the potential tillers of it—bonded tillers, that is, fit only for imperial ends. 

:: 10-9-16 Freedom Fighter Times :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Order Out of Chaos: Third World War Rapidly Approaches, International Order Undergoing a Foundational Shift

By Nate - 10/09/2016

The world is on the brink of the most catastrophic war in the history of mankind, the Third World War, and the entire geopolitical landscape is undergoing a foundational shift. According to US Army Chief, the next world war is “almost guaranteed,” and would be “extremely lethal and fast.” Mark Miley, chief of staff United States Military, claims “The strategic resolve of our nation, the United States, is being challenged and our alliances tested in ways that we haven’t faced in many, many decades,” Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley told an audience at the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. Miley continued, “I want to be clear to those who wish to do us harm … the United States military — despite all of our challenges, despite our [operational] tempo, despite everything we have been doing — we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before. Make no mistake about that.” The fact of the matter is that World War Three is beyond denial at this point, even the United States Military is claiming it’s imminence. According to Russia the world is undergoing a foundational shift, more specifically the Russian ambassador to the UK, Alexander Yakovenko, said this; “The established world order, is undergoing a foundational shakeup, with the Crimea, Ukraine, and Brexit.” Later on the ambassador called for the dismantling of NATO, and the European Union. Yakovenko then stated “Russia can now fight a conventional war in Europe and win, Russia is the only country that will remain relevant forever, any other country is dispensable, and that includes the United States, we are in game now.” It is far more evident now than ever before that relations between Russia and the United States are at all-time lows, and even worse than during the Cold War. In fact, according to “Doomed to Cooperate” editor Siegfried Hecker; recent actions by Putin to suspend the plutonium disposition accord with the US, which is one of the last agreements the two countries have, signals a major breakdown and that war is closing in. The Plutonium Disposition was a deal set in place, by both Russia and the United States directly after the Cold War; and the agreement entailed the disposal of tons of plutonium to make sure it could never be put back into bombs. Both the Soviets and the US each had tens of thousands of nuclear weapons. Each nation had built stockpiles more than 30,000 nuclear weapons at that time. So when Russia decides to hold on to the plutonium, believe you me – something is up and both the US and Russian armies are gearing up for it. Mark Milley later on stated: “In short the ways and means of war is in my view is about to undergo fundamental, profound and significant change…In fact we are undergoing that change right now as we sit here. That change is evolutionary not revolutionary, but it is no less profound. Milley is referring to the ‘shift in power’ or in other words the New World Order. “We know from history that unipolar and bipolar international systems tend to be very stable, but we also know that multipolar systems are inherently prone to competition, confrontation, instability and state on state wars. We are entering that multipolar future, and in fact we have probably been in it for a few years.” The coming New World Order will rise from the ashes of the short-lived socialist, multipolar international system that is currently ‘under construction.’ The United State’s dominance is declining, and the Obama gang is facilitating that decline. Below is the list of polarities, and their explanations which can be read like a timetable. 1Phase One – Unipolarity Unipolarity is used to describe the power structure when one superpower dominates alone. The end of the Cold War meant that the previous decades’ superpower rivalry now had ended. There was no longer the “traditional” East vs. West conflict, at least not the way it had been earlier in the 20th century. The United States surfaced as the sole dominating power in world politics as there were no real challengers to their hegemonic position. This allowed greater room for the superpower to maneuver and to get involved in international issues that not necessarily coincided with national interest. We can describe this new political situation as being unipolar. 2Phase Two – Bipolarity Bipolarity is used to denote the basic structure in the international system when it is dominated by two superpowers. This means that other states must ally themselves with one of the two major powers, which again limits their room to maneuver and thus result in more stable international politics. 3Phase Three – Multipolarity (currently under construction) A system of multipolarity increases rivalry in world politics, the reason being that many states of similar strength compete for power and influence. These states are often uncertain of other states’ intentions, which increases the probability of military action. Also, the power balance in this type of system is changing constantly, as a result of changing alliances. Multipolarity denotes the fundamental power structure in an international system dominated by several large powers, and is characterized by antagonism between these. 4Phase Four – The New World Order After the collapse of the short-lived multipolar world which led to World War Three, a new world will commence. That international order would be the return of an oligarchy, or in other words, the world would be centralized under a single governance. Under this New World Order, there would be no borders, a single currency, a single religion, operated under highly advanced technology (Artificial Intelligence). Given the current state of geopolitics, Mark Milley then began to touch on the Homefront and where the military was in regard to readiness. It just so happens that the Chief of Staff indirectly states that Jade Helm was a success. “In the past year we focused on current readiness and applied time and money into building it, and it’s improving and will remain our top priority. And now we have to define and build the army of the future. We’re heading in the right direction on both fronts. The process that we developed to think critically and deliberately is working and it’s guiding our investments and decisions.” In 2015, the largest military drill took place across the nation, and it was called Jade Helm 15. Jade Helm began an ongoing exercise that introduces the military to predictive intelligence services. Under the artificial intelligence sectors of DARPA and IARPA, the military expanded their capabilities of predicting enemy combatants movements before their actual actions. On the Homefront, the army, and national guard failed to mention Russians as the enemies and instead the authoritarian forces named Christians and Conservatives as their enemies. In Jade Helm, various states were treated as “hostile” to the establishment, and one of those sates happened to be Texas. In conclusion it is beyond evident that the United State and Russia are both gearing up for the largest war of our time, World War Three. However, this war will not be fought by the axis and allies, but rather this world war will be serving an agenda; to bring about the New World Order. Through the destruction of the current Order, the globalists will rise; or as famously stated, through their chaos they will “bring order.” Other various quotes taken directly from Mark Milley throughout the speech (see video above): “For whatever reason, the bottom line is that massive amounts of people in unprecedented numbers are moving from one country or one region to another, which is amplifying destabilizing effects. One of the most militarily significant mass migrations is the movement of people to cities, which has really been going on for well over a century. 75 percent of Americans lived in rural areas 100 years ago while today that number is completely in-versed with almost 70 percent of Americans living in urban areas. Globally we are witnessing urbanization on a massive scale. In 1950 only two cities, New York and Tokyo, had populations over 10 million people. Today there are 38 and it’s projected by 2050 there will likely be over 50 megacities of over 10 million inhabitants with 70 percent of the worlds estimated 8 billion people living in urban areas.” “Climate change is yet another driver of future instability.” “Maturity of various technologies that either exist today or in advanced stages of development when combined are likely to change the very character of war all by themselves.” “With the advances in information technology we are now seeing an entire new domain of warfare in the form of cyber.”

Works Cited MARK HODGE. “ WWIII WARNING Third World War would be ‘extremely lethal and fast’ US Army chiefs reveal as they discuss taking out Russia or China.” The Sun. . (2016): . . 

Matthew Cox. “Army Chief Issues Stark Warning to Potential Enemies.” Military . . (2016): . . 

Jeffery Lewis. “The United States and Russia Are Prepping for Doomsday.” Foreign Policy. . (2016): . . 

[ :: 10-3-12 pm service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. But it is a very, very dark hour, a very wicked hour, a very evil hour with much going on every day, every moment of the day. You see it not maybe here in the sense that others are seeing it around the world. But I say unto you, open your spiritual eyes, open your spiritual eyes, see, see, see what is taking place. etc..

:: 10-10-16 Sputnik :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Bill Clinton Squirms as Protesters Across Country Yell at Him ‘You’re a Rapist!’

21:22 09.10.2016(updated 02:25 10.10.2016)

The ultimate fallout of Friday’s tape release showing Republican nominee Donald Trump using lewd and disturbing language towards women may be the death of Bill Clinton’s legacy as the world is reminded of the half-dozen rape allegations against the former US President. One has to wonder whether Donald Trump’s campaign is on the verge of explosion or whether Hillary and the media are playing with fire by exposing a recording of the Republican nominee making lewd statements in private captured by a hot mic given the history of her husband Bill Clinton. While the media bashes Trump, too many establishment politicians to count pull their endorsements and calling for him to step down as the nominee, and Twitter gets lit up with the fallout of a major political candidate being captured on video saying that he just “grabs [women] by the p----,” a new trend appears to be developing of turning the tables on the Clintons on the topic of violence against women. The trend started yesterday when Juanita Broaddrick, who accuses Bill Clinton of having raped her 38 years ago in Arkansas and says that Hillary Clinton threatened her into silence, tweeted in defense of Trump’s disturbing statements that there is a difference between actions and words – and that the actions of both Hillary and Bill Clinton are "horrific." Yesterday at a rally in Milwaukee a heckler began to yell over the former President that "You’re a rapist" leaving the seasoned politician left to squirm uncomfortably as the rest of the Pro-Clinton crowd booed the protester. Catching his wits, Bill Clinton tried to play it off saying, "They had a bad day yesterday, so they’re trying to make it up" referring to the Trump campaign before saying "This is the matter with politics. When other people pour poison down your throat don’t drink it. Give back good." Juanita Broaddrick spoke in favor of the protester who maligned Bill Clinton’s campaign appearance tweeting, “What a brave man. If anyone knows him tell him thanks for me." One week earlier during the Fox and Friends news segment a protester lurked behind the camera and started yelling the same state, "Bill Clinton is a rapist" before being carried away by a security detail. While the pro-Hillary media stretches Trump’s very obscene statements to suggest that the Republican is a sexual predator, one is left wondering how much longer they can hold the floodgates back of the Clinton’s not so stellar reputation on such matters of decency, sexual violence, and treatment of women.

Read more: 

:: 10-9-16 Conservative Daily Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Leaked Memo Hours Ago Shows Plan To Accept Wave Of Jihad Refugees

Posted by Eric Whittle | Oct 9, 2016 | National Security, States’ Rights

It is truly astounding that Hillary Clinton pretends to be an idiot when asked questions by the press, Congress, or just about anyone who hasn’t handed her millions—or billions—of dollars. Mrs. Clinton puts on an act that would imply she is the most dimwitted dolt in the world when talking to us insignificant poor people, but that all changes once her mouth starts running at a donor speaking event. She and her husband Bill have made it abundantly clear that they plan to raise the number of Middle Eastern migrants by around 500%, and want to ‘rebuild’ Detroit by populating it with refugees. They’ve bashed Trump as a racist for not wanting to let in refugees or travelers from terrorist nations until they can be properly vetted (Islam isn’t a race, by the way). Were she to get elected, over the course of Hillary’s Presidency 1.5 million migrants would be living in America. Before continuing, here’s an example of the same kind of refugees in Germany. With that number and image in mind, here’s a lovely little quote from Hillary “Islam is a religion of peace” Clinton.They can’t possibly vet all those refugees, so they don’t know if jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees,” she said to a crowd of rich donors. This is another one of those “private” positions she talked about further down the leaked transcript. This quote, which everyone is free to look up if they wish to find it, directly contradicts what Mrs. Clinton has been saying for over a year on her campaign. “We can’t close our eyes to the fact that there is a distorted and dangerous strain of extremism within the Muslim world that continues to spread,” she said to a packed room of full of the richest people in the world. That sentence sounds exactly like something a Republican would say. The fact remains that she is not a Republican, so why would Hillary admit that Islamic extremism exists to them, but not us? Because her “dream” is a society with “open trade and open borders.” “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.” [Hillary Clinton, Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 28] Hillary Clinton is caught up with fulfilling her dream while filling her pockets. So much so, that she outright ignores the consequences of her actions; like in Benghazi. The same is true for Obama. With this new information, the American public can say, with confidence, that Hillary Clinton isn’t stupid or ignorant—she knows exactly what she’s doing. She knows what horrible things could come out of her actions, but it doesn’t seem to bother her whatsoever according to her words in the transcript. Hillary knows we can’t possibly take in all those refugees free and clear of terror, and yet she advocates for 1.5 million of them to come into the United States. To Hillary Clinton, the United States isn’t a sovereign nation with laws, rules, tradition, and a culture. To Hillary Clinton, the United States is a gigantic mass of land where she can dump all of her failed ideas so that her dream might come true. History has shown the world time and time again that ideas and dreams don’t matter. They have no bearing on reality, and reality can’t be changed. No matter how much someone wants unicorns to be real, they never will be. In this sense, Hillary Clinton is trying to surgically implant a spiked-horn onto a horse and call it good enough. This might kill the horse, but she doesn’t care; it looks like a unicorn, and that’s all she cares about. Mrs. Clinton is also aware of the mistakes she made—every single one of them. The leaked transcript revealed that she knew there wasn’t enough security in Benghazi, knew that her actions would lead to more death, and knew that she had failed; this is why she is so desperately trying to get into the Oval Office. “So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk—you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians” [Hillary Clinton, Speech to Goldman Sachs, 2013 IBD Ceo Annual Conference, 6/4/13] She doesn’t want to be President so that she can purposefully manipulate and annihilate the American people. Evil people don’t even know they’re evil. Adolph Hitler thought he was doing what was right for Germany and its people by killing millions of innocents. Hillary Clinton wants to be President of the United States to fulfill her dream, and do what she thinks is “right.” The leaked transcript shows that she does recall the deaths her decisions brought, and wants to correct those mistakes while making even more deadly decisions. Her ideas directly conflict one another. This woman is delusional. America isn’t a ball of clay ready to be molded. The United States of America is steadfast in its ways and bombastic in its attitude. We welcome all Americans regardless of where they come from. The Statue of Liberty has a plaque which states proudly to the whole world: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” Those kinds people are the ones that can be molded to fit our country, but our country will never mold to fit them. That plaque speaks from America’s point of view. It asks other nations for their tired, their huddled masses, and their tempest-tossed. It doesn’t invite those who worship death so much that they would force it upon our land, not a single one. 1.5 million of these death worshipers is too absurd to imagine. The United States cannot be molded to fit the ideology of another culure’s people; the people must be molded to fit the culture of America. Hillary Clinton has other plans. If she were to speak to the world’s people through the plaque on the Statue of Liberty, it might be similar to the following: “What difference at this point does it make?”—Hillary Clinton’s remark about the four dead Americans in Benghazi. The United States of America is not for sale, it is not malleable, and it is not going to welcome the untold millions of people who she knows will bring horrors to America and its citizens. 

:: 10-10-16 Fellowship of the Minds :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Hillary Clinton, the new Lord of the Flies

Posted on October 10, 2016 by Dr. Eowyn |

Have you ever had a fly land on your face? My childhood was spent in the semi-tropics, but I can honestly say that while I had to swat away mosquitoes in the summer, I had never had a fly land on my face. But flies seem to have an affinity for certain people. “Lord of the Flies” is the literal meaning of βεελζεβούβ, the Greek word for Beelzebub. Beelzebub — derived from Ba‘al Zebûb, a Semitic deity worshiped in the Philistine city of Ekron — is the name of one of the seven princes of Hell. Later Christians used the name Beelzebub as a term for Satan. Flies have an affinity for Barack Obama. The first time the phenomenon was noted was during the 2008 presidential campaign that ended in Obama being voted into his first term of presidency. On October 28, 2008, Los Angeles Times reporter Peter Nicholas, who had been spending (as he put it) “18 hours a day covering Obama,” recalled a creepy incident on a campaign stop one hot summer afternoon in Iowa: “Obama was flipping burgers at a backyard barbecue, in what the campaign hoped would be an exquisite photo opportunity. A fly began circling his head. Then more flies. Pretty soon flies were swarming him, the burgers — everything. It was awful to watch. But in rhythmic fashion he began waving them off with his hand. He scooped up the burgers and headed back to the picnic table, as if nothing had gone wrong.” The next “Obama and flies” incident occurred on June 16, 2009 while he was being interviewed by MSNBC in the White House. A fly kept buzzing around his head. Without a moment’s hesitation, Obama killed the fly with his hand. On June 22, 2010, it happened again. Obama was speaking to the press about the new Obamacare bill in the East Room of the White House, and a fly landed right on top of the left side of his mouth. Obama also attracted a swarm of bees and a rat. See: Obama, Flies, and Bees (on the Biblical significance of bees) Now Obama’s Attracting Rodents Last night, October 9, 2016, at the second presidential debate in Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, Hell’s sceptre of Lord of the Flies was passed from Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton. This momentous supernatural event was signified by a fly landing on Hillary’s left (how appropriate) eyebrow. (H/t Heat Street) It was not a hot, sweltering day yesterday in St. Louis, Missouri. The daytime high was 78°; the nighttime low was 43º (source), which meant that by the time the debate began at 9 p.m., the temperature should have gone down to the 60ºs. UPDATE: Steve Qayle sent me this reminder that our Lord Jesus Christ had twice mentioned Beelzebub in Luke 11:18-26: If Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand? because ye say that I cast out devils through Beelzebub. And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your sons cast them out? therefore shall they be your judges. But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you. When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils. He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out. And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished. Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. 

[ :: 12-31-15/1-1-16 New Year’s Eve Service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. Watch, know what my word says, and there shall be terrorist’s attacks, for they cannot be put off, for you allow the terrorists to come in like Trojan horses and they are here and nobody wants to deal with them. etc.

:: 10-6-16 The Counter Jihad Report :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Hillary and ‘Undocumented’ Aliens – Are illegal aliens really just “immigrants” who lack documentation?

Front Page Magazine, by Michael Cutler, October 6, 2016

The excuse “my dog ate my homework” supposedly explains why a student failed to bring a homework assignment to class, but it is an excuse that no one believes. It is not limited students who fail to do their homework, but has come to be the cliché excuse for anyone not completing an assignment who provides a lame excuse that everyone knows is a lie. Politicians, pollsters and pundits who are advocates for open borders and the creation of immigration anarchy seek to minimize the true significance of aliens entering the United States without inspection and, of critical importance in this particularly perilous era, without vetting. Their strategy to deceive Americans is to employ the equivalent excuse of the dog eating homework by saying that these illegal aliens entered the United States “without documentation,” thus shifting attention from the fact that millions of aliens entered the United States stealthily, without inspection. This is the strategy of Hillary Clinton and her immigration anarchy accomplices. The inspections process is conducted at America’s 325 ports of entry located along the northern and southern borders of the United States, at seaports that lie along our nation’s 95,000 miles of coastline and at international airports by the arm of DHS known as CBP (Customs and Border Protection), and is supposed to prevent the entry of aliens who pose a threat to the safety of America and Americans. When a student fails to turn in an assignment his/her teacher will normally press that errant student about why the homework really was not completed, demonstrating the teacher’s dissatisfaction with the excuse. Yet the obvious question that is never asked about illegal aliens who enter the United States without inspection who claim to be “undocumented” is, “What really happened to their documents?” Did they ever have a passport or other identity documents? Did they somehow lose them on their way to the United States? Did they destroy them before running our borders because they know that their names on those passports would show up on terror watch lists or on lists of international fugitives? Before we go any further, it is vital to understand that the documents we are talking about are not library cards or credit cards. These are cards that, under law, are supposed to provide reliable evidence about the true identity of the bearer. This is a matter of national security. In point of fact, Title 8 U.S. Code § 1101 – Definitions is a part of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and provides essential definitions relating to the enforcement and administration of our nation’s immigration laws. Here is how this section of the INS defines passport: (30) The term “passport” means any travel document issued by competent authority showing the bearer’s origin, identity, and nationality if any, which is valid for the admission of the bearer into a foreign country. “Undocumented aliens” entered Mexico before they ran the U.S./Mexican border. How on earth did they manage to enter Mexico? If they flew to Mexico they likely had their passports upon entry and subsequently destroyed them. Consider the national security crisis this creates for the United States. I recently wrote an article that disclosed how Mr. Obama is now “addressing” this clear national security threat, “Beyond Belief: Obama Seeks Illegal Immigration Assistance Of Latin American Countries As Aliens Flood Into The U.S.: The wolves helping to guard the hen house?” Increasingly the Border Patrol has been intercepting aliens from countries other than Mexico and, appropriately, referring to them as OTMs (Other Than Mexico). Some of these aliens are not only not citizens of Mexico, but are not even citizens of Latin American countries. Some, in fact, are citizens of “Special Interest Countries.” These are countries that are involved with terrorism. That these aliens managed to travel half-way across the globe and, upon arrival in the United States, are found to have no passports or other authentic identity documents should set off alarm bells. Hillary Clinton’s “solution,” however, is to provide them with lawful status and even pathways to citizenship within 100 days of becoming president. The use of passports and identity documents and multiple failures of the immigration system were the focus of considerable attention by the 9/11 Commission. The preface of the official report, “9/11 and Terrorist Travel: Staff Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States” includes this paragraph: The story begins with “A Factual Overview of the September 11 Border Story.” This introduction summarizes many of the key facts of the hijackers’ entry into the United States. In it, we endeavor to dispel the myth that their entry into the United States was “clean and legal.” It was not. Three hijackers carried passports with indicators of Islamic extremism linked to al Qaeda; two others carried passports manipulated in a fraudulent manner. It is likely that several more hijackers carried passports with similar fraudulent manipulation. Two hijackers lied on their visa applications. Once in the United States, two hijackers violated the terms of their visas. One overstayed his visa. And all but one obtained some form of state identification. We know that six of the hijackers used these state issued identifications to check in for their flights on September 11. Three of them were fraudulently obtained. Page 46 and 47 of this report noted: By analyzing information available at the time, we identified numerous entry and embedding tactics associated with these earlier attacks in the United States. The World Trade Center Bombing, February 1993. Three terrorists who were involved with the first World Trade Center bombing reportedly traveled on Saudi passports containing an indicator of possible terrorist affiliation. Three of the 9/11 hijackers also had passports containing this same possible indicator of terrorist affiliation.5 In addition, Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the attack, and Ahmad Ajaj, who was able to direct aspects of the attack despite being in prison for using an altered passport, traveled under aliases using fraudulent documents. The two of them were found to possess five passports as well as numerous documents supporting their aliases: a Saudi passport showing signs of alteration, an Iraqi passport bought from a Pakistani official, a photo-substituted Swedish passport, a photo-substituted British passport, a Jordanian passport, identification cards, bank records, education records, and medical records.6 “Once terrorists had entered the United States, their next challenge was to find a way to remain here. Their primary method was immigration fraud. For example, Yousef and Ajaj concocted bogus political asylum stories when they arrived in the United States. Mahmoud Abouhalima, involved in both the World Trade Center and landmarks plots, received temporary residence under the Seasonal Agricultural Workers (SAW) program, after falsely claiming that he picked beans in Florida.” Mohammed Salameh, who rented the truck used in the bombing, overstayed his tourist visa. He then applied for permanent residency under the agricultural workers program, but was rejected. Eyad Mahmoud Ismail, who drove the van containing the bomb, took English-language classes at Wichita State University in Kansas on a student visa; after he dropped out, he remained in the United States out of status. Page 61 contained this passage: Exploring the Link between Human Smugglers and Terrorists In July 2001, the CIA warned of a possible link between human smugglers and terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and Egyptian Islamic Jihad.149 Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that since 1999 human smugglers have facilitated the travel of terrorists associated with more than a dozen extremist groups.150 With their global reach and connections to fraudulent document vendors and corrupt government officials, human smugglers clearly have the “credentials” necessary to aid terrorist travel. Back when I was a Special Agent of the former INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) we found that aliens who had arrived at John F. Kennedy International Airport, supposedly with no passports, immediately claimed “Political Asylum.” It was discovered that they had destroyed their passports in the bathrooms on the airliners on which they flew to the United States. All too often such arriving aliens were given appointments to show up for hearings at the immigration offices and they simply disappeared once they left the airport. The solution to this was not costly or difficult. Their passports should have been placed in a locked box upon boarding the airliners that would be placed in the cockpit or other secured place on the aircraft. Yet, to my knowledge, this simple measure was never considered nor implemented. They certainly shouldn’t have been released on their own recognizance in the United States. There are often simple and inexpensive solutions to the problems relating to the immigration crisis. However, it is clear that all too many of our politicians, irrespective of party affiliation, aren’t interested in solving these problems, but they have been bought and paid for by the immigration anarchists lead by such organizations as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Documenting the “undocumented” is a prescription for a disaster. As the 15th anniversary of the attacks of 9/11 approached, I wrote an article about the vulnerabilities that the Obama administration abjectly refuses to address. My article was, “Reflections on 9/11’s Vulnerabilities: The failures that proved key factors in the attacks — and how Obama has exacerbated them.” My dad used to say that nothing is so good it couldn’t be better or be so bad it couldn’t get worse. I am convinced that somehow Ms. Clinton would find a way to make the immigration crisis worse — much worse. 

[ :: 3-30-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.  for if you put the man in that I desire for you to put in, you will have good times until you go.  If not it shall be hell here on earth and you will think that you have been left behind, but that is not so.  

For I have told you before this that this would be the last President, that this would be the last President as you know a President, therefore listen, pay attention, for it is your life it will affect, but it doesn’t need to affect it in a bad sense it can affect it in a good sense.  You can be the victors, you can be the overcomers, but hear, hear what I, your Father God, has to say. 

For truly my people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge and I, your Father God, have said that if you lack anything ask and I, your Father God, will give it unto you.  And therefore, I am giving wisdom and knowledge when it is asked of me, but many times my people do not ask of me, but they make their own choice and their own decisions, and therefore, they have to pay the consequences and the price for those decisions.  Even as in the days of old when the children of Israel said let us, let us choose and they chose and the one that they chose was not the one that I chose and they ended up defeated because of that.  So you see my people when you follow after me and follow after my word and when you seek my wisdom, when you seek my counsel you are able to make the right decisions.  The decision that will bring you victory, the decision that will make you the overcomer, the decision that will help you and you see how the people decided in the past and they made the wrong decision and they paid the consequence because of that.  So seek my face, call upon my name, ask for wisdom, ask for knowledge and I will give unto you that wisdom, I will give unto you that knowledge, I will show you exactly who to vote for, I will show you what to do.  For truly if you follow after my ways and my wisdom you shall have victory, saith the Lord.

:: 10-10-16 The Common Sense Show :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Trump Destroyed Hillary but She Declared War On Russia

By Dave Hodges

The first 90% of this article covers the essentials of Debate II. However, if want to skip to the punch line, go to the last several paragraphs and you will know that you need to know about what a Hillary presidency will mean to the longevity of your children. For those who are interested, here is an analysis of the debate followed by a critical analysis of what makes Hillary so dangerous when it comes to Russia because Hillary’s “locker room talk” will result in the death of billions of people. The Debate The second debate was billed by CNN as an inquisition of Donald Trump’s inappropriate remarks and supposed disdain he has for women. Despite a rigged moderating crew, which I predicted when I found out the inquisitors were going to be Cooper and Raddatz, It was the establishment vs. Donald Trump. This is a familiar position for him. Who can forget when the Republican leadership was saying, in the primaries, that it doesn’t matter who the people vote for, they were going to pick the candidate. Trump’s victories were so overwhelming, that the Republican leadership did not get to carry out their plan. The moderators and Clinton made such a big deal about Trump’s campaign “exploding” and his candidacy is “in crisis”, that they miscalculated what was going to happen on the debate stage. The moderators had their shovels out and were preparing to bury Trump over the “locker room talk issue”, and the opposite happened. There hasn’t been a bigger upset in politics or sports since the 1969 Superbowl when Joe Namath and New York Jets upset the highly favored Baltimore Colts. In short, Hillary Clinton got her 4th degree Coven Witch’s backside handed to her in this debate. The Locker Room Talk Issue Donald apologized for his inappropriate remarks, remarks that about 90% of all men have made in the exclusive company of other men to impress them with no real intent on acting on their braggadocios words towards women. Anderson Cooper would not let go of the topic and kept interrupting Donald and basically asked him if he groped women’s genitals without permission. Excuse me, but in the words of the most intelligent person in my family, my wife, who asked, “What the hell does locker room talk have to do with running the country”? In a brilliant move, Trump did what we have all done in support of Donald Trump. What is worse, my words or Bill Clinton’s actual abuse of women and his wife’s support of his abuse? “She has threatened his accusers”, she has “defended the rapist of a 12 year old girl and joked about about it twice”. Which is worse? For any reasonable person watching the debate, Trump took the sting right out of locker room talk and placed the bulls eye where it belongs, on Bill and Hillary Clinton’s rear end. For those who are still fixated on Trump’s locker room talk, look at what the press corps and former Secret Service Agents Say about Clinton’s demeanor AND inappropriate language. I challenge you to listen and do a compare and contrast between Donald and Hillary? And then maybe we can get on to the real issues. Here is a video made where I clean up Hillary’s language, realizing I run a family operation, but I leave no doubt, through innuendo, of the language that this 4th degree Coven Witch uses. Remember, Donald Trump is not accused of raping anybody. Bill Clinton has been accused of sexual assault by his victims (e.g. Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, et al) multiple times and each time Hillary defended him and according to the victims, she has threatened them with reprisal for their allegations. Which is worse America? Take that Anderson Cooper. Other Peripheral Issues The candidates talked about a couple of meaningful issues: Hillary’s private and public stances. It has been documented by Wikileaks that Hillary told Wall Street in paid speeches in which she would not release the transcripts. In these meetings with Wall Street Clinton supported the TPP, despite her public claims to the contrary. She tried to excuse the public/private differential responses by saying she was referring to Abe Lincoln in a movie. It was good that I had my feet up on the couch because it was getting deep in every living room in America at that point. Hillary defended the disaster that was Obamacare. Trump destroyed her on this point and stated that she will throw good money after bad to save this disaster of a health care plan. Hillary was taken to task for her attacks on the Second Amendment. I was very disappointed that the selling uranium issue to the Russians, reported by the NY Times, and the Clinton Foundation arms deals and money laundering operations were not exposed. What are you waiting for Donald? The other issues were largely banter and a series of one-liner zingers, “Hillary is a liar” and “Donald doesn’t have the temperament to serve”. However, the line of the night belonged to Trump. Hillary: “… it is a good thing that people like Donald Trump are not running our legal system..” Trump interrupted and said “You are right because you would be in jail”. To that, the crowd exploded in laughter and applause. Anderson Cooper, the omnipresent defender of the establishment, went ballistic on the crowd who stuttered and stammered as he realized that he had lost control of the narrative. In the finality of the debate, Clinton’s criminal behavior was on display for all to see. In fact, Clinton and Trump traded roles. Trump’s inappropriate locker room talk slid right off the debate stage while Hillary’s criminal behavior stuck. However, these one-liners were not the real issue at the debate. debates don’t tell you much about leadership, except with one issue, the Russian problem. The Debate Most Important Issue: Hillary Declares War On Russia Hillary, again and without any proof whatsoever, made the allegation that the Russians are hacking into our elections. How is that possible Hillary? Thi sis the excuse to allow DHS and the UN to “oversee” our elections, I mean steal our elections. We will not have an election until November 8th, so who are the Russians hacking, Hillary? This Russian hacking thing reminds me of the movie Wag the Dog in which a mythical President (aka Bill Clinton) is caught having sex with a girl scout. In order to deflect attention, he makes up allegations and starts a war with Albania based upon false allegations of terrorism. The Hollywood movie producer who facilitated the fraud for the President was murdered at the end to conceal the real truth. How very and uniquely Clinton is that ending to a movie that eerily represents the Clinton mentality? Last night, Hillary Clinton frightened me. She did not frighten me because she is a witch according to her former insiders (e.g. Larry Nichols). She did not frighten me, too much, because she’s a sociopathic criminal. She frightened me because she declared war on Russia. If she is elected, Putin will have no choice but to attack the United States. Hillary stopped short of saying she would put ground troops in Syria. But she did say we would keep special forces and the Air Force in Syria and THAT SHE WOULD ENFORCE A NO-FLY ZONE. And of course if your Air Force is in a theater of war, your ground troops are next. These are acts of war. Mark my words, and we need to pray to Almighty God to stop Hillary. If Hillary Clinton is elected we will have a devastating world war in which billions will die. For every American who wants their children to live out normal life spans, Hillary’s comments should disqualify her from serving. Trump on the other hand said he wants to work with Russia. My self-preservation instinct prefers negotiation to genocide. Please pray in unison that this lunatic and witch, Hillary Clinton, is never elected to Presidency. May God help us all. Here is a more detailed analysis of the debate if anyone feels the need to go beyond the Russia issue. 


:: 10-8-16 The Christian Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Globalism Is Anti-Christ, Demonic, Theologians Argue

By Brandon Showalter , CP Reporter September 28, 2016|10:37 am

Prominent theologians and scholars are saying this week that while globalism may be a buzzword this election season, too few understand the demonic forces driving this ideology. As The New York Times reported Monday, until relatively recently it was rare to hear people referred to as "globalists" but the label is more common now. And while many globalists claim to have the interests of the entire world at heart, the irony is that they have become a tribe of sorts; and they are a wealthy, elite, and powerful tribe for whom national borders are an impediment to their agenda. While many definitions for globalism exist, a wide chasm separates 1) necessary global exchanges in an increasingly interconnected world, like trade, legal immigration, and the cooperation and sharing of ideas across borders, and 2) globalism as a secular humanistic religion of sorts that envisons a one-world government. For the second definition of globalism, such views are antithetical to a Christian worldview, according to some, even as the Church itself is global and the Kingdom of God is not constrained by national borders. "A major objection to globalism from a spiritual and biblical point of view is that many of the globalists are pushing for a global value system," said Wallace Henley, senior associate pastor of 2nd Baptist Church in Houston, Texas in a Tuesday phone interview with The Christian Post. Henley, who has written recently on CP about national borders (see part 1 here, part 2 here, and part 3 here) further explained that there is an anti-Christ spirit at work in the world that opposes the Kingdom of Christ, which is righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. "The Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ is the highest form of civilization. The anti-civilization represented by anti-Christ is the opposite of that. So if the kingdom of Christ is righteousness, the anti-civilization is evil and injustice. If the kingdom of Christ is peace, the Kingdom of anti-Christ is conflict. If the Kingdom of Christ is joy in the Holy Spirit, anti-civilization is misery." In a September 4 American Thinker article titled, "Globalism: the Religion of Empire" theologian Fay Voshell noted similarly that "[l]ike the Christian vision of the universal Kingdom of God, the religion of secular globalism claims universality, but is an earthly minded substitute for the Church universal. The Christian vision sees the Church universal as God's kingdom ruling the earth. The religion of globalism sees an earthly, utopian world order in which all men pay allegiance to elite priests who rule over a World City without national borders." That lack of borders, Henley continued, is particularly problematic, "because within borders a particular civilization can choose to uphold those principles that we [as Christians] believe are at the heart of what makes a civilization a civilization." Without nation-states within those borders, "the only alternative to that is a global governance scenario which is terrifying," he added. Political tensions in the past year such as the populist backlash against Germany's acceptance of hundreds of thousands of refugees from the Middle East, Britain's vote to leave the European Union, and the contentious Republican primary that produced a Donald Trump candidacy for President have showcased nationalist revolts against globalist ideas and influence. In an 18-point essay that went viral on Charisma News in August, Pastor Jim Garlow of Skyline Church in San Diego suggested that perhaps the most important reason for Christians to support Donald Trump, is that he opposes globalism whereas Clinton thrives on it. "Globalism is far more than 'geographical' or 'eliminating national borders and boundaries,'" Garlow wrote. "It is spiritual and demonic at its core. Few — very few — understand this. This is quite likely one of the main reasons why Trump is hated. Do your homework on this one. Think 'principalities and powers.'" CP asked Henley to comment on Garlow's contention that few Christians understand this. Globalism, Henley offered, amounts to a "secular spirituality" and its devotees are quite religious. "[That] secular spirituality would deny any kind of operation of an antichrist or demonic spirit, they would be panned. So it's not even a legitimate field of study in the institutions where thought is being formed. It would be terribly politically incorrect," Henley said. Furthermore, he continued, "there's a general redefinition and revisionism in the academic community and the other consensus formers that make it almost impossible. If an academic would begin to talk about this he would lose tenure, he would lose everything." Christians are not the only ones who find globalist ideology troubling. And, not every anti-globalist is pro-Trump. (Henley, for instance, wrote a series of anti-Trump op-eds during the Republican primaries. See here, here and here.) George Mason University Law School Professor and author of the 2004 book The Case for Sovereignty: Why The World Should Welcome American Independence Jeremy Rabkin argues that globalism fundamentally stands at odds with democratic forms of government. In a Tuesday CP interview, Rabkin, a Jew, expressed his distaste for Donald Trump. But on globalism, he said, "beyond that it is not democratic, there's something about it that is a little creepy, a little uncanny." "It's basically saying 'We are going to organize the world in a way that establishes an artificial consensus.' It's not enough to say it's undemocratic. It's threatening; it's almost demonic. It is a world organized independently of people's fundamental religious convictions," Rabkin said.

Read more at 

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. Keep your eyes; keep your eyes upon what is going on in the Mid-East, that is your tree, that is your tree, I have told you to watch Israel, that is your tree. etc.

:: 10-9-16 Y net :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Two killed in Jerusalem shooting attack

Five others wounded in a shooting attack near Israel Police headquarters and the light rail station on Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem; one 60-year-old woman was left in critical condition, while a police officer sustained serious injuries; both later succumbed to their wounds.

Ynet reporters|Last update: 09.10.16 , 14:03

A police officer and a 60-year-old woman were killed and five injured Sunday morning after a terrorist committed a shooting near a police station next to the Ammunition Hill light rail station in Jerusalem. According to a police report released shortly after the incident, the terrorist, who had previously served five prison sentences for a variety of offense including aggravated battery, illicit military training and setting fire to vehicles, opened fire from within his vehicle on people standing by the station situated opposite police headquarters. The terrorist—later identified as a 39 year old from the East Jerusalem neigborhood of Silwan and a full Israeli citizen—then fled the scene, continuing his rampage as he shot two people sitting in their car. He then proceeded in the direction of Tomb of Simeon the Just in Sheikh Jarrah where he stopped his vehicle and began shooting at riot police pursuing him on motorbikes. One of the officers, who was later identified as 1st Sgt. Yosef Kirma, was critically injured during the shootout and died from his wounds shortly thereafter. Another policeman was also lightly wounded in the fire exchange. Israel Border Police spotted the terrorist before shooting him dead. Security forces began conducting searches for additional suspects, setting up a number of roadblocks in the area. Paramedics arrived on the scene where they treated multiple victims, one of whom was left in critical condition and one in serious condition. Another 3 were moderately wounded while two women sustained light injuries. An additional 3 victims were taken to hospital and treated for shock. Among the victims was a 60-year-old woman, who was immediately evacuated to Hadassah Medical Center in critical condition and eventually succumbed to her wounds having been shot in her upper body. Minister of Public Security Gilad Erdan arrived at the scene and spoke with the press, telling them there was no forewarning for this attack. “But we have said the whole time that because of the increase in the amount of incitement many will plan lone-wolf attacks,” he added. Erdan then went on to attribute responsibility for the attack to Facebook. “In my opinion, Facebook and other social media sites bear direct responsibility. It was two or three weeks ago that Facebook reopened Hamas's pages following Palestinian public pressure. In my eyes, it's scandalous." "I don't necessarily draw a connection between this and the current attack," the minister clarified. It is not the first time that Erdan has espoused his vociferous opposition to the paucity of effective measures to counter rife online incitement. Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat said “Once again we are witness to cruel, merciless terror aimed at innocent civilians. (The terrorists) are trying to disrupt our lives and harm us. I wish all the wounded a speedy recovery. “We will not bow. We will continue to live our lives, despite the uncompromising war on terror and wild incitement. I praise our security forces that acted immediately, got to the terrorist and neutralized him. I want to congratulate them for the holy work they perform year-round, especially during the holiday period,” Barkat said. Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum stated the attack was "a natural reaction to the continued crimes of the occupation against Palestinians and the al-Aqsa Mosque." His organization did not take responsibility for the attack, however.,7340,L-4864512,00.html 

[ :: 9-4-05 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

There will be thousands of deaths from this hurricane and it will take more months than any storm to recover from, costing millions of dollars, by far the most costly storm to date, yet there shall be bigger storms to come. I have forewarned those along the seashores that they should leave everything and that they should move north etc

:: 10-10-16 ABC News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Hurricane Matthew Leaves Trail of Devastation With at Least 24 Dead Across 5 Southern States


Hurricane Matthew brutalized the Southeast coast for four days before weakening and veering out over the Atlantic Ocean Sunday, leaving a trail of devastation with at least 24 dead, over 1 million homes and businesses without power and billions of dollars in damage. Matthew wreaked havoc in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia before it was downgraded to a post-tropical cyclone Sunday as it headed east over the Atlantic. The death toll spans all five states: at least 10 people were killed in North Carolina, six died in Florida, four in Georgia, three in South Carolina and one in Virginia. The storm brought winds of up to 100 mph, as much as 15 inches of rain and powerful storm surges of up to 9 feet to some areas. Millions of people's lives were disrupted, with the evacuation of more than 3 million coastal residents; the closing of hundreds of roads including parts of Interstate 95 -- a major East Coast artery; the halting of Amtrak service in the Southeast; the cancellation of thousands of airline flights. Hurricane Matthew Unearths Civil War Era Cannonballs in South Carolina Charleston Is a Ghost Town Ahead of Hurricane Matthew Hurricane Matthew Health Risks Could Last Long After Storm Passes North Carolina is one of the last states affected by Matthew and one of the hardest-hit. At least 10 deaths in the Tar Heel state have been attributed to the storm, and at least five people are missing, Gov. Pat McCrory said this morning. There have been over 1,400 water rescues in North Carolina, a number expected to rise, the governor said. McCrory said the greatest threat right now is flooding in areas away from the coast, which is expected to continue throughout the week. Across the South, over 1 million homes and businesses are without power this morning. There are over 465,000 outages in North Carolina; 455,000 outages in South Carolina; 140,000 outages in Georgia; and 175,000 in Florida. Initial estimates are that Matthew has caused insured losses of $4 billion to $6 billion, according to CoreLogic, but the preliminary number likely underestimates the storm's total impact. Experts say Matthew could be the costliest storm to hit the United States since Superstorm Sandy in 2012, which had an estimated $68 billion in damages.

ABC News' Rebecca Jarvis and Benjamin Stein contributed to this report. 

[ :: 8-17-14 pm service (third word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. you see all the things that are going on in the world, you see the darkness, you see the troubles, etc.

:: 10-10-16 USA Today :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Two missiles fired from Yemen land near U.S. warship

Jane Onyanga-Omara , USA TODAY 7:48 a.m. EDT October 10, 2016

Two missiles fired from rebel-held territory in Yemen landed near a U.S. warship in the Red Sea, the U.S. Navy said Monday. Ian McConnaughey, a spokesman for U.S. Navy Forces Central Command, said it was unclear if the USS Mason — a guided missile destroyer — was specifically targeted, but the missiles were fired in its direction in the space of an hour from 7 p.m. local time Sunday. The Navy said that no American sailors were injured and the warship was not damaged. Pentagon press secretary Peter Cook said the missiles appeared to have been fired from territory in southern Yemen controlled by Iran-backed Shiite rebels known as Houthis, the Wall Street Journal reported. The incident happened in international waters north of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait in the southern Red Sea, according to the WSJ. The Houthis denied targeting the warship. The launches came as a ballistic missile fired from Yemen targeted an air base near the Muslim holy city of Mecca in Saudi Arabia, local media reported, in apparently the deepest strike into Saudi territory by Houthis and their allies. The incidents follow a Saudi airstrike on a funeral hall in the Yemeni capital Sanaa on Saturday that killed more than 140 people. The Saudi government said Sunday that it would investigate, with assistance from U.S. experts. 

[ :: 4-22-16 pm service  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::]

etc. For truly blood shall flow in the streets and things will be very bad in that sense and in the weather also that you have already seen a change in like I have said you would see.  Drought shall affect very many places and food shall be scarce, but I have given unto you my word and my promise that I will take you through these days victoriously. etc

:: 10-9-16 KESQ :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Two officers dead and a third injured in Palm Springs Shooting

2-officers dead in Palm Springs shooting

By: Katie Widner Posted: Oct 08, 2016 04:04 PM PDT Updated: Oct 08, 2016 09:58 PM PDT 

[ :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::] 

John 15:20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. (KJV)

Luke 21:17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. (KJV) 

[ :: 10-19-08 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. You shall be hated by the world, the world shall be against you, etc.

John 15:18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. (KJV)

[ :: 12-31-11 / 1-1-12 New Years Eve Service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. Have you read my word, do you know that Ezekiel thirty eight and thirty nine is knocking on the door, as a matter of fact, its got a battering-ram and it is knocking the door down, but you are not aware of that.  Are you aware of how they are removing the Bible, are you aware of how they are fighting Christians, are you aware of the countries that are killing every Christian that is there?  And then you think I can delay another five years or another ten years.  Have you not read in my word where they are laying under my altar and they are crying out, how much longer, how much longer?  Oh what a sad state the world is in. etc.

[ :: 11-3-13 am service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc.  for the world hates the Christians more now than at anytime in history.  Even during the days Jesus walked on earth, it is much worse now and it is not going to get better because those that don’t believe the truth are going to come against you like never before because they don’t want you to know the truth etc.

:: 10-5-16 The Christian Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Putin's Russia Cracks Down on Religious Freedom

By Eric Metaxas , Christian Post Contributor October 5, 2016|12:07 pm

"Papers, please!" It's a chilling expression you hear a lot in World War II movies. But it's also something you might hear if you hold a Bible study in Moscow. We all know about the dire circumstances faced by Christians in the Islamic world. Even the White House has finally called what's happening to Christians in Iraq and Syria "genocide." But there's another place where religious freedom is under assault: Russia. This is a surprise to some. After all, post-Soviet Russia takes pride in its Christian heritage. Its president, Vladimir Putin, has positioned himself as a champion of Russian Orthodoxy. His stance on traditional marriage and opposition to homosexual activists has won him praise and admiration from many conservative Christians. But just ask Donald Ossewaarde if he thinks that Putin and Putin's Russia are champions of religious freedom. Ossewaarde, a Baptist missionary from the United States, was one of the first people to run afoul of the recently passed "Yarovaya Law." The Yarovaya Law, which purports to be a counter-terrorism and public safety measure, prohibits "religious gatherings in unregistered places," restricts promoting religion on the internet, and makes it easier for Russian officials to deny entry into and departure from the country. "Papers, please!" It's a chilling expression you hear a lot in World War II movies. But it's also something you might hear if you hold a Bible study in Moscow. We all know about the dire circumstances faced by Christians in the Islamic world. Even the White House has finally called what's happening to Christians in Iraq and Syria "genocide." But there's another place where religious freedom is under assault: Russia. This is a surprise to some. After all, post-Soviet Russia takes pride in its Christian heritage. Its president, Vladimir Putin, has positioned himself as a champion of Russian Orthodoxy. His stance on traditional marriage and opposition to homosexual activists has won him praise and admiration from many conservative Christians. But just ask Donald Ossewaarde if he thinks that Putin and Putin's Russia are champions of religious freedom. Ossewaarde, a Baptist missionary from the United States, was one of the first people to run afoul of the recently passed "Yarovaya Law." The Yarovaya Law, which purports to be a counter-terrorism and public safety measure, prohibits "religious gatherings in unregistered places," restricts promoting religion on the internet, and makes it easier for Russian officials to deny entry into and departure from the country. And since the Yarovaya Law places severe restrictions on evangelization (or "proselytizing" as the Russian government sees it), it's not hard to see how a Baptist missionary might get into trouble. The law defines "missionary work" as "the activity of a religious association, aimed at disseminating information about its beliefs among people who are not participants (members, followers) in that religious association, with the purpose of involving these people as participants (members, followers)." Activity that falls under this definition may "only be performed 'without hindrance' at [designated] churches and other religious sites . . . [and it is] expressly forbidden to perform missionary activities in private residences." Ossewaarde was arrested for holding a Bible study in his home and for posting public notices announcing his Bible study. He was fined 40,000 rubles, roughly $625. And his Russian court-appointed lawyer warned him to accept the fine and leave Moscow. Ossewaarde, however, is appealing his conviction. Other groups such as Seventh-day Adventists, Mormons, and especially Pentecostals are rightly nervous about what happens next. A leader of Russia's Pentecostal Union told Forum 18, a Christian Human Rights group based in Oslo, that "the local police officer came to a home where a group of Pentecostals meet each Sunday . . . [and] with a contented expression he told them: 'Now they're adopting the law, I'll drive you all out of here.'" Thus the law threatens to be yet another chapter in the century-old story of the persecution of Russian Pentecostals. It should be clear that the law has little, if anything, to do with defending Christianity and everything to do with Russian nationalism. As author David Aikman told Christianity Today, "The Russian Orthodox church is part of a bulwark of Russian nationalism stirred up by Vladimir Putin . . . Everything that undermines that action is a real threat, whether that's evangelical Protestant missionaries or anything else." Thing is, Islamists and Hindu nationalists also view uncooperative Christians as a threat to their idea of a "good society." And while, thankfully, Russia isn't using violence — at least not yet — the violation of religious freedom is just as real. So, we should make our concern and displeasure clear to the State Department, the White House, and to our elected officials. And if we can't bring ourselves to do so, we should at least have the decency to dispense with the man-crushes on Vladimir Putin.

Read more at 

[ :: 2-24-13 am service  (fifth word)  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

For truly you are seeing the end time signs that I have spoken to you about, and if you were studying, you would clearly see them being fulfilled etc.

:: 10-9-16 CBN news :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Is it Time to Rebuild the Third Temple?

10-07-2016 Julie Stahl

JERUSALEM, Israel – Jerusalem Dateline's Julie Stahl recently spoke with Liz Healy, an American who has spent years studying the Temple Mount in Jerusalem's Old City. In the following interview, Healy talks about the significance of the contested site to Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Stahl: We're here on the Mount of Olives with lots of tourists and we're overlooking the Temple Mount with the golden Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque. What's the significance of the Temple Mount to Muslims? Healy: For Muslims, it's the third holiest site in their religion, but interestingly enough, it's not the Dome of the Rock that's the most prominent site. It's the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Stahl: What's the significance of the Temple Mount to Jewish people? Healy: In Jewish tradition, this is where Adam was created. It was also the place after the flood that Noah brought an offering to the Lord. We know this is the place that Abraham brought Isaac to be sacrificed. Also, [it's] the place where David bought the threshing floor [and] where he said he wouldn't make an offering to God that cost him nothing. And it's the site of the first and second [Jewish] temples. It was believed by most, also, the place for the third temple where it will be built. Stahl: It's such a holy site to so many people. Why is it so controversial? Healy: I think that's the exact purpose. Because it's so holy and all the monotheistic religions – Christians, Jews and Muslims – all feel like this is their place of worship and so it's very controversial as to who's going to actually end up on this mount. Stahl: Do you think the three religions could share the Temple Mount? Healy: Personally, I don't, but there is a huge movement about coexisting on the Temple Mount and even recently, within the last two weeks, I know about a meeting between Christians and Muslims and Jews who all are talking about what are the possibilities and how could they establish both a temple and a mosque on the Temple Mount. Stahl: What kinds of plans are being made to build a third temple? Healy: There are actually quite a few and depending on the group you talk to, different architectural designs have been made. So one group is doing a design more like Herod's Temple and it would be on the Temple Mount and I don't believe they would have a mosque that would be there. There are other groups that are more focused on the design that's given in Ezekiel, chapters 40 through 48, which is the next structure in scripture that God said to build – a temple in this way. And then, even some archaeological research has been done recently that would say that the Holy of Holies is not under the Dome of the Rock, which is the most common assumption, but a little bit to the north and that's why, kind of, the coexistence movement is moving forward…because it's possible they could be right next to each other on the Temple Mount. Stahl: Where in the Bible does it talk about building a temple -- a third temple? Healy: There's several references and it somewhat depends on interpretation, but we would begin in the Book of Daniel where it talks about the Abomination of Desolation and we know that's happened once, but it talks of a future time where the sacrifices will again be taken away so a temple would have to exist for the sacrifices to be done. We also see it listed in Matthew 24 and Mark 13 [and] in II Thessalonians. They all make a reference to a false messiah setting himself up in a temple and declaring himself as God or removing the sacrifices. We also see in the Book of Revelation, John is told to measure the temple measurements and so there has to be a physical temple for him to be able to measure it. Stahl: So what preparations are actually being made right now to build the third temple? Healy: There are actually quite a few and it just shows that God is giving the Jewish people kind of signs or an expectation that it's time for the soon-coming messiah. But there is a group specifically that has re-established the Levitical priesthood. They started a school a few months ago and they have a registry for those who are from the Levitical line that they could come and be trained and be ready to do the service in the temple. They've also started a red heifer farm. The Temple Institute did [this] with an Israeli farmer and that was again with ritual purity – that they need to have a red heifer that meets Jewish law and has been supervised and doesn't have any white hairs, able to be completely burned and the ashes mixed with running water and then used to make everybody ritually pure to be able to go into the temple. Stahl: I mean, right now, Jewish people just going on the Temple Mount can create a riot sometimes. So can you envision a scenario where they would allow the temple to be built? Healy: No. A lot of the scholars I've spoken to talk about how the building of this next temple is really going to bring peace to Israel and bring safety from all of her enemies. And so in that way, I can see that any, maybe, leader that would be raised up or somebody that would be able to bring the nations together, especially those who might align with Israel that there might be some agreement that a temple could exist there and this person could be set up in the temple. What we know is that's probably going to be a false messiah because as we read in the Book of Daniel there's a false messiah that's going to make a peace agreement and so the potential is that something would be built before the false messiah set himself up. 

:: 10-5-16 :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Founding Fathers: Quotes on Liberty and Freedom from America's Revolutionaries

An iconic group of men who led the American Revolution against the British Crown, the Founding Fathers' legacy lives on today as we continue our fight for liberty and freedom. Below are our favorite quotes from a few of our Founding Fathers. “It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow.” James Madison “You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve YOUR freedom. I hope you will make a good use of it.” John Adams “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.” Thomas Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria “What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” Thomas Jefferson “When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” Benjamin Franklin “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” Thomas Jefferson “One loves to possess arms, though they hope never to have occasion for them.” Thomas Jefferson “No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms...” Thomas Jefferson “The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people...that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.” Thomas Jefferson “Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state.” Thomas Jefferson “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed ― unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.” James Madison “The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.”From the east to the west blow the trumpet to arms! Through the land let the sound of it flee; Let the far and the near all unite, with a cheer, In defense of our Liberty Tree." Thomas Paine “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” Samuel Adams “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” Patrick Henry “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined...The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun." Patrick Henry “The militia is our ultimate safety. We can have no security without it.” Patrick Henry “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?” Patrick Henry “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for few public officials.” George Mason “[W]hen the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man – who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually, by totally disusing and neglecting the militia.” George Mason “Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American...The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” Tench Coxe “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” Tench Coxe “The militia, who are in fact the effective part of the people at large, will render many troops quite unnecessary. They will form a powerful check upon the regular troops, and will generally be sufficient to over-awe them.” Tench Coxe “The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” Noah Webster “Before a standing army or a tyrannical government can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular (or professional) troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.” Noah Webster “Those that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin “Of the liberty of conscience in matters of religious faith, of speech and of the press; of the trial by jury of the vicinage in civil and criminal cases; of the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus; of the right to keep and bear arms...If these rights are well defined, and secured against encroachment, it is impossible that government should ever degenerate into tyranny.” James Monroe “Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defence of the country, the over-throw of tyranny, or in private self-defense.” John Adams “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” Alexander Hamilton “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.” Joseph Story “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them.” Richard Henry Lee “This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty...The right of self-defense is the first law of nature; in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest possible limits...Wherever standing armies are kept up and [when] the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.” St. George Tucker “The rights of conscience, of bearing arms, of changing the government, are declared to be inherent in the people.” Fisher Ames “Free men have arms; slaves do not.” William Blackstone “The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.” William Rawle “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? It is feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” Tench Coxe “If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms – never – never – never!” William Pitt “[T]he people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.” Zacharia Johnson 

[ :: 3-11-15 pm service (third word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc darkness is only going to continue to grow darker, the turmoil and the disaster in the world is only going to continue to get worse and every week you see how my word is being fulfilled even more so, saith the Lord. etc

:: 10-5-16 Sky Watch TV :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::


October 5, 2016 by SkyWatch Editor

An ancient prophecy [described in the new best-selling book The Final Roman Emperor] predicted an end-all battle meant to evoke the end of the world – and ISIS is preparing to trigger it. According to the extremists’ perversion of the Koran, Dabiq will be the site of a “major apocalyptic showdown with the armies of the infidel” that will prompt the end of civilization. As explained by Express, American commandos and Turkish troops stand just three miles from the prophesied city of Dabiq. ISIS claimed the final battle will occur in a field just outside Dabiq and quote their prophet, Mohammed, saying “the last hour will not come” until an army conquers the Romans at “Dabiq or Al-A’maq.” The group is so obsessed with the apocalypse prophecy, they named their hate-filled magazine after the prophesied city. One of the founders of ISIS, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, quoted the magazine to say: “The spark has been lit here in Iraq, and its heat will continue to intensify – by Allah’s permission – until it burns the crusader armies in Dābiq.” Some sources claim the battle has already begun, with reports of Turkish artillery fire hitting Dabiq. (READ MORE) 

:: 10-5-16 King World News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Paul Craig Roberts: Washington Pushing The World To War – Can Trump Stop It?

October 05, 2016

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, warned that Washington is pushing the world to war. (King World News) Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: What must the world think watching the US presidential campaign? Over time US political campaigns have become more unreal and less related to voters’ concerns, but the current one is so unreal as to be absurd… The offshoring of American jobs by global corporations and the deregulation of the US financial system have resulted in American economic failure. One might think that this would be an issue in a presidential campaign. The neoconservative ideology of US world hegemony is driving the US and its vassals into conflict with Russia and China. The risks of nuclear war are higher than at any previous time in history. One might think that this also would be an issue in a presidential campaign. Instead, the issues are Trump’s legal use of tax laws and his non-hostile attitude toward President Putin of Russia. One might think that the issue would be Hillary’s extremely hostile attitude toward Putin (“the new Hitler”), which promises conflict with a major nuclear power. As for benefitting from tax laws, Pat Buchanan pointed out that Hillary used to her benefit a loss almost as large as Trump’s and during the Arkansas years Hillary even took a tax deduction for itemized pieces of used clothing donated to a charity, including $2 for one of Bill’s used underpants. The vice presidential “debate” revealed that the Democratic Party’s candidate is so ignorant that he thinks Putin, who is democratically elected and has enormous public support, is a dictator. Here is what we know about the two presidential candidates. Hillary has a long list of scandals from Whitewater and Vince Foster to Benghazi and violation of national security protocols. She is bought-and-paid-for by the oligarchs on Wall Street, in the mega-banks, and in the military-security complex as well as by foreign interests. The proof is the Clinton’s $120 million personal fortune and the $1,600 million in their foundation. Goldman Sachs did not pay Hillary $675,000 for three 20-minute speeches for the wisdom they contained. What we know about Trump is that the oligarchic establishment cannot stand him and has ordered the Ministry of Propaganda, a.k.a., the US media, to destroy him. Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us. Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this. Moreover, if Trump were to end up in the White House, it doesn’t mean he could prevail over the oligarchy. The oligarchy is entrenched in Washington with control over economic and foreign policy positions, think tanks and other lobbyists, and the media. The people control nothing. What does the world think when they see Donald Trump damned because he doesn’t want war with Russia or the American economy moved offshore? Where in American politics do Washington’s European, British, Canadian, Australian, and Japanese vassals see leadership worthy of their sacrifice of sovereignty and independent foreign policy? Where do they even see a modicum of intelligence? Why does the world look to the most stupid, vile, arrogant, corrupt and murderous government on the planet for leadership? War is the only destination to which Washington can lead. 

[ :: 3-30-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.  for if you put the man in that I desire for you to put in, you will have good times until you go.  If not it shall be hell here on earth and you will think that you have been left behind, but that is not so.  

For I have told you before this that this would be the last President, that this would be the last President as you know a President, therefore listen, pay attention, for it is your life it will affect, but it doesn’t need to affect it in a bad sense it can affect it in a good sense.  You can be the victors, you can be the overcomers, but hear, hear what I, your Father God, has to say. 

For truly my people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge and I, your Father God, have said that if you lack anything ask and I, your Father God, will give it unto you.  And therefore, I am giving wisdom and knowledge when it is asked of me, but many times my people do not ask of me, but they make their own choice and their own decisions, and therefore, they have to pay the consequences and the price for those decisions.  Even as in the days of old when the children of Israel said let us, let us choose and they chose and the one that they chose was not the one that I chose and they ended up defeated because of that.  So you see my people when you follow after me and follow after my word and when you seek my wisdom, when you seek my counsel you are able to make the right decisions.  The decision that will bring you victory, the decision that will make you the overcomer, the decision that will help you and you see how the people decided in the past and they made the wrong decision and they paid the consequence because of that.  So seek my face, call upon my name, ask for wisdom, ask for knowledge and I will give unto you that wisdom, I will give unto you that knowledge, I will show you exactly who to vote for, I will show you what to do.  For truly if you follow after my ways and my wisdom you shall have victory, saith the Lord.

:: 10-5-16 World Net Daily :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Sitting out the election: Just what Satan wants

Exclusive: Karl Payne urges voters not to be affected by 'demon-caused passivity'

Published: 3 days ago Karl I. Payne

I am not typically a real political partisan. My hope is built on nothing less than Jesus’ blood and righteousness, not a particular political party or ideology. However, I still vote in both local and national elections. Why do I vote if no one on the ballot represents a perfect candidate? Because I still have the privilege to do so – and some candidates promote positions and policies that are more consistent with Christian morals and ethics, and individual, religious and political freedoms, and others promote positions and policies that are less consistent with Christian morals and ethics, and individual, religious and political freedoms. Franklin Graham is correct when he intimates that elections should be more about policy than personality. I am a Christian who happens to vote, not a voter who happens to be a Christian. I do not and will not apologize for this. Those who disagree with my Christian faith do not apologize for their ideological, religious or political positions, so why should I feel compelled to do so? My goal is to do the best job I can do representing the Lord Jesus Christ with the time He has afforded me to live on planet earth as one of His ambassadors. In this country, Christians should still have as much right to verbalize and promote their convictions as those who verbalize and promote different convictions. All U.S. citizens, including those with religious beliefs and convictions, are supposed to be guaranteed constitutional rights and protections. In other words, people who currently insist that Christians should keep their personal religious and ideological views private and compartmentalize their religious convictions from their civil and constitutional convictions are extremely hypocritical when they refuse to keep their personal views private or compartmentalize their theistic or atheistic views from their civil and constitutional convictions. Daimonizomenos is a Greek participle used in the New Testament that is often translated demon possession in English. Etymologically, the word means demon-caused passivity. It has nothing to do with ownership and everything to do with degrees of control. Ephesians 2:1-2 is a reminder that the current ruler of this world is Satan, although it is clear that his authority is limited and on a leash. Demons are real and so are their influences and attacks. Satan, their prince or master, wants Christians to respond to his influence and attacks in fear and with passivity. Christians, on the other hand, are commanded in James 4:7-8 and 1 Peter 5:6-9 to actively resist, or stand resolutely against the devil, his workers and their works. Active resistance is diametrically opposed to passive indifference. The culture we live in actively tells Christians that it is fine to be a light, as long as that light is covered. It is OK to consider yourself salt, as long as you agree to blend into culture so as not to hurt feelings or give offense. If you want to shine as a star in the night, it’s all right, as long as you tuck yourself behind clouds so that your reflection does not offend anyone looking up. If you choose to believe you are called to be an ambassador for Christ, that is just fine, as long as you keep your message to yourself or share your message in private with those who already agree with your message. Light that is hidden, salt without savor, stars under clouds, ambassadors that volunteer to remain mute, allowing their work to speak for them – amazing how Satan’s desire for Christians to remain passively silent and our culture’s prescription for acceptable and tolerable Christian expression seem to be one and the same. Like father, like son is an adage that makes a lot of sense in the context of our culture if we understand who God says currently rules planet earth for a time. But that time is quickly coming to a close, and the true King of Kings is returning sooner than later to personally and publicly take over his rightful rule and reign. Until that day, what are we doing, and whose marching orders are we following or disobeying? God Almighty has commanded us to contend for the faith once for all delivered to the saints, to be active ambassadors who refuse to be silenced. Satan would have us apologize for our faith, agree to remain passive to receive the praise of man, and insists our service have more to do with compliant monkeys who see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil than soldiers for Christ. Vote for whomever you choose – but vote. Sitting it out for a perfect candidate is an exercise in futility, and worse, it is responding with passivity, which is exactly what the prince of the air, a dragon on a leash, would direct you to do. “Love Jesus in your church, that’s fine, but do not take your message outside the walls.” That message may please some men, but it does not please God who died on a cross to give us the right to tell others about His love, truth, justice and free gift of salvation, given through His righteousness, not earned as a reward because of our own work (Ephesians 2:8-9). We live in a country that still allows it citizens to have a part in electing their leadership. Do not buy into a message of passivity and throw this privilege away. For me, the promises from the two candidates regarding their respective appointments for Supreme Court justices alone make this one a no-brainer. You do not have to agree with me, but you ought to agree that Christians who are U.S. citizens have both the right and responsibility to actively participate in a process God ultimately holds securely in His hands. But like prayer, He wants and expects us to participate. God bless you.

Read more at 

[ :: 11-3-13 am service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc.  for the world hates the Christians more now than at anytime in history.  Even during the days Jesus walked on earth, it is much worse now and it is not going to get better because those that don’t believe the truth are going to come against you like never before because they don’t want you to know the truth etc.

:: 10-5-16 Stream :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Christian Leaders Warn of Soros-Funded “Hijack” of Christian Left

With George Soros' funding, leftists are infiltrating and misdirecting Christian institutions.

By The Stream Published on October 4, 2016

A coalition of 630 influential Christian leaders, mostly evangelicals, spearheaded by Kelly Monroe Kullberg and Dr. Alveda King, has called on “progressive” Christians to “repent.” It asks them to atone for “work that often advances a destructive liberal political agenda.” That agenda, the appeal’s writers suggest, is allied with and partly funded by billionaire secular leftist George Soros, who uses the profits of his past currency speculation to promote radical causes around the world. The authors note: As recent leaked documents confirm, and as Rev. Jim Wallis of Sojourners eventually admitted, wealthy, anti-Christian foundations, following the lead of billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, fund and “rent” Christian ministers as “mascots” serving as surprising validators for their causes. The consequent realities include injury to countless people, the Church, the family, nation and the global Church including many martyrs. When it comes to progressive Christians who were willing to take Soros’ money, the authors are willing to name names: At a time when many Christian ministries are struggling, a few of the Soros network “faith” and “interfaith” grantees are Jim Wallis of Sojourners, Richard Cizik’s New Evangelical Partnership, Telos, J Street to malign Israel, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, Faithful America and Gamaliel. Faith in Public Life has worked to “counter” Christians and the Tea Party in the media and, with PICO, advocate for amnesty, mass Islamic migration, even seeking to influence the visit and priorities of Pope Francis himself. Billions of additional dollars to “Christian VOLAGs” for large scale “refugee” and migrant resettlement comes from the Obama administration. Joining “faith” fronts, Soros also funds thousands of other collaborators and projects that suggest his goal is to demoralize America (and Europe). The list includes: film studios and hundreds of media outlets; attempts to control the internet; racial and gender agitation; euthanasia; drug legalization and “injection zones;” abortion and the “sex worker” industry; Al Gore’s Climate campaign; pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel projects; the rights of jihadists and Sharia advocates. In the ironic rhetoric of compassion, Soros and friends also fund mass immigration followed by voting “rights” and redistricting schemes, while financing the campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. (Soros is a major donor to the Democratic Party and co-chairman of Ready for Hillary PAC.) The authors of the statement cited Martin Luther King, Jr. as an alternative model for Christian social engagement: As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. taught, “In contrast to ethical relativism, Christianity sets forth a system of absolute moral values.” He wrote, “We need to recapture the gospel glow of the early Christians who were non-conformists. … Their powerful gospel put an end to such barbaric evils as infanticide. … Finally, they captured the Roman Empire for Jesus Christ.” The authors lay out a stark catalog of the consequences for America and the church of eight years of progressive-dominated government under Barack Obama:

A growth industry trafficking in human baby organs and body parts — funded and defended by the Democratic Party.

The abandonment of a biblical view of marriage that protected and liberated children and adults from centuries of pagan slavery, poverty, polygamy and non-life-giving sexuality.

The transgender agenda imposed by Obama-government edict, including gender re-education to be forced on our citizens, businesses, schools, military and churches.

Doubling of our national debt, economic stagnation and increased welfare dependency.

Increased minority unemployment, poverty and violent inner city lawlessness, with an accompanying loss of opportunity, self-determination and family stability.

Heightened racial division and tension, and the growing phenomenon of paid demonstrators being recruited and dispatched to instigate protests that often become riots.

Open borders and ‘sanctuary’ cities increasing drugs, disease, crime, gangs and terrorism.

Forced refugee resettlement in hundreds of American cities without citizen consent, mandated by the federal government in collusion with the United Nations. “Refugees” are primarily non-assimilating Muslims, while authorities reject persecuted Christians.

Hostility towards Judeo-Christian religious liberty in our courts, media and universities including the suppression of conservative speakers, free thought and moral education.

The widespread, political use of the IRS to intimidate conservative, patriotic and Christian groups that disagree with the current political establishment.

The statement also cites Hillary Clinton’s now-infamous 2015 speech at the Women in the World Summit, where she averred that religious beliefs “have to be changed” to accept abortion on demand. With that statement, the signers say, Clinton “was openly declaring war on Christian believers and the Church.” The evangelical appeal urged fellow Christians “to question the true intentions of persons or organizations that receive money from Soros and other billionaire globalists,” noting that the “hostility of the Progressive political agenda to biblical faith is foreign to the Spirit of Jesus.” Instead, the statement suggests: Let us return to the whole counsel of Scripture, not the political abuse of Scripture. Together, we can commit to healing, wisdom and renewal of our faith and culture. Let’s stimulate humility and gratitude, not pride and entitlement. Let’s see the image of God in people and enable the virtuous cycle of creativity, opportunity, work, productivity, wealth and thus greater voluntary generosity. Signers of the appeal include Eric Metaxas, Lt. Gen. Wm. “Jerry” Boykin, Bishop Harry R Jackson, Jr., Mat Staver, Fr. Frank Pavone (of Priests for Life), Tim Wildmon, Dr. Ted Baehr, radio host Sam Sorbo, Jason and David Benham, Archbishop Wm. Paul Mikler, Rick Scarborough, and The Stream’s Jay Richards and John Zmirak. To read the statement in its entirety and view its list of signatories go here. Why Such an Appeal? Why Now? The Stream asked the lead author of the appeal, Kelly Monroe Kullberg (author of Finding God At Harvard), for the background on this letter. She said, “After a few years of failed attempts to engage Progressive ministers, we wrote the letter because we’re deeply concerned for the Church and nation. Millions are heartbroken to see what has happened to the Church and nation in the past decade or two.” Pointing to the long list of bad spiritual and temporal results of leftist policies, Kullberg asked, “Why would religious leaders keep pushing such damaging ideas and policies on the nation? We think there are answers and we’d like them to join us all in national repentance and renewal.” This isn’t an attempt to impose a right-wing agenda, Kullberg said. “Christians and conservatives don’t think of accruing power. We’re just trying to do our best work and be good to our families and neighbors.” She continued: The danger is that the Christian faith, evangelical and Catholic, is being used, manipulated, weakened and redefined. It would be good to de-politicize the Church and get back to the gospel, the good news of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection that charges life with meaning, and all things with hope. The gospel is actual social renewal. I hope citizens will dive deeper into, and speak louder of, the life-giving nature of the Bible, the U.S. Declaration, Constitution and Bill of Rights. Because other forces are endangering the American experiment and human beings. To the Religious Left or anyone else attempting to redefine the gospel, I’d say that Biblical and Constitutional wisdom yield the highest love for human beings. Not globalist, secular social engineering forced upon people whom God loves. For a deeper understanding of the correct relationship between Christian faith and politics, Kullberg recommended “Francis Schaeffer’s classic, A Christian Manifesto, a timely reminder of the beauty of servant-leadership, God’s wisdom, and the dangers of authoritarianism.” 

:: 10-6-16 Countdown to zero time :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::


on October 6, 2016 Posted In: Uncategorized

The Clintons are so crooked so corrupt so power mad and capable of killing or destroying anyone and any country that huge donations have been made to the Clinton foundation as protection money. The Clinton Crime syndicate has been doing very well out of all this. A new interview from someone that was involved with the attempted peace talks in Libya has come forth and blamed Clinton. Christian preacher Dr. Kilari Anand Paul is a global peace ambassador and a naturalized citizen of the United States. He was also someone that was personally invited to Tripoli, Libya by Muammar Gaddafi. He arrived in Libya in 2011 with a peacekeeping team. After the United States received word that he was arriving, General Wesley Clark asked Dr. Paul to negotiate a settlement between the United States Department of State and Gaddafi to put an end to the fighting there. In ten short days, an agreement was made. The parties involved included the Prime Minister of Libya, Baghdadi al Mahmoudi, President Gaddafi, and the United States State Department along with the Obama White House. General Clark as well as Representative Dennis Kucinich watched the deal. The deal was all signed and ready to be implemented. The effects of it would include ending the dictatorship and seeing democratic elections for the first time in 42 years. Many people thanked Dr. Paul for doing “whatever it takes to promote peace and stop war.” The effects of this would have included preventing Libya from collapsing into a state that would be fought over by rival jihadist gangs. Benghazi would never have happened, ISIS would never have been created, and the migrant crisis would never have been created. So what prevented this from happening? The Democratic presidential nominee for president of the United States happened. Clinton denied the peace deal. Well if she denied the deal, she must have had a good reason for it. WRONG. Clinton denied thClinton’s grudge against someone is the reason that ISIS has risen, the reason the Libya has fallen, the reason that the Benghazi attacks happened, and the reason that there is a migrant crisise deal because of a personal vendetta against Gaddafi. She never forgave Gaddafi for supporting Obama over Clinton during the 2008 election cycle. So basically, . Clinton Is The Reason That Libya Fell, The Reason That ISIS Rose, And The Reason Benghazi Happened Dr. Paul even acknowledges this. “It’s well known in Libya that Gaddafi supported Obama over Clinton in the run up to the ’08 elections, despite the Clinton team approaching Gaddafi’s son, Saif al-Gaddafi, and asking the family to invest in Hillary’s campaign and foundation, which they did not. Given that Clinton nixed the deal, everything that was mentioned above happened. Adding fuel to the fire was that Clinton made a public television appearance praising the death of Gaddafi. She literally exclaimed, “We came, we saw, he died!” Dr. Paul even believes that her excitement over the public execution of a leader is further evidence that she had a grudge against him. “Her personal vendetta better explains her oddly giddy behavior when taking credit for Gaddafi’s horrifying death, as captured on video for the world to see.” He even claims that this is the reason that other Middle Eastern nations went to make sizable donations to the Clinton Foundation. They were afraid that they would be the next country in line to face Clinton’s wrath. Clinton Has Scared Other Countries Into Donating And Supporting Her “Clinton’s penchant for the violent overthrow of less than cooperative governments knows no end, and they know it.” Dr. Paul also stated that GCC member states Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates are all “silently terrified at the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming the next President of the United States.” Dr. Paul also raises a good point. “Why is anyone who knew anything about Clinton’s overthrow of Gaddafi dead, missing, in prison, or their good name besmirched and their voice silenced?” Now the media will attempt to discredit Dr. Paul’s statements, but he has some good backers on his side. Former Congressman and civil rights leader Walter E. Fauntroy backs him up. He also visited Libya on a peace mission. Well Fauntroy also disappeared for five years. He claims that he fled because he feared that he would be assassinated to prevent him from showing what he witnessed in Libya. Dr. Paul also said that he was personally warned by a member of the CIA that his life, “was in danger not from the war but from Secretary Clinton herself.” Clinton also had involvement in ordering his arrest to tarnish his reputation. Fauntroy and Dr. Paul are not the only people to claim that Clinton was at fault for this. New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi has supported Fauntroy’s credibility. “I have spoken with former Congressman Walter Fauntroy and I have researched his account of his experiences in Libya.” Dr. Paul is adamant in blaming Clinton for the disaster in Libya. He added that the scandal “makes Watergate look like child’s play.” Dr. Paul admits that he is putting his life at risk by showing what he knows about Clinton denying the Libyan peace deal. But he can’t hold back on this. “Anyone who knows too much about this deplorable former Secretary’s actions turns up dead like Chris Stevens or Gaddafi. Still, there is far too much at state for this great nation, America, for me to remain silent any longer. I know I’m risking my life going public with what I know—but God will hold me accountable if I know the truth and do not speak it for fear of Clinton.” this sums it up 

[ :: 4-22-16 pm service  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::]

etc. For truly blood shall flow in the streets and things will be very bad in that sense and in the weather also that you have already seen a change in like I have said you would see.  Drought shall affect very many places etc

:: 10-5-16 Daily Mail :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

US Southwest is 'virtually certain' to suffer a megadrought this century, researchers warn

Dry spells lasting at least two decades have gripped Southwest before

Future megadroughts would be hotter and more severe, team say

By Associated Press Published: 15:15 EST, 5 October 2016 | Updated: 17:51 EST, 5 October 2016

Already dealing with parched conditions, the U.S. Southwest faces the threat of megadroughts this century as temperatures rise, says a new study that found the risk is reduced if heat-trapping gases are curbed. Oppressive dry spells lasting at least two decades have gripped the Southwest before, but scientists said future megadroughts would be hotter and more severe, putting a strain on water resources. The study, published in the journal Science Advances, is the latest to find that droughts more extreme than what is currently being experienced could become more common as the planet warms. Using computer modeling, researchers calculated there's between a 70 percent and 90 percent chance the Southwest will experience a megadrought later this century. If precipitation is below normal, the risk jumps to 99 percent — 'virtually certain,' said lead researcher Toby Ault of Cornell University. 'Megadroughts are comparable in severity to the worst droughts of the 20th century but are of much longer duration, ' the team warn. 'A megadrought in the American Southwest would impose unprecedented stress on the limited water resources of the area, making it critical to evaluate future risks not only under different climate change mitigation scenarios but also for different aspects of regional hydroclimate.' 'We find that regional temperature increases alone push megadrought risk above 70, 90, or 99% by the end of the century, even if precipitation increases moderately, does not change, or decreases, respectively. WHAT IS A MEGADROUGHT? Long-lasting mega-droughts could occur with increasing frequency in the western US later this century if no action is taken to rein in climate change, researchers said. Mega-drought is defined as any drought as bad as the worst already seen in the 20th century, but lasting 35 years or more. Onje study by Cornell University is the first to predict that the coming intense dry spells could exceed the decades-long mega-droughts that occurred centuries ago and are blamed for the demise of certain civilisations in 13th century.

Read more: 

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[ :: 12-31-09/1-1-10 New Years Eve Service (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. For the disasters that shall take place are many, the flooding shall be far greater than in times past, the mudslides far greater than in times past, the earthquakes shall be more numerous and far greater than in times past. The tornadoes, oh the savageness of the tornadoes that shall rip across the land, the straight winds, the hurricanes, the forest fires, the volcanoes shall erupt, the rising of the sea level that will be marked not in inches but in feet. etc.. 

:: 10-5-16 Daily Mail :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

'This storm will kill you': Tailbacks leave thousands in gridlock across the East Coast as two million are told to flee deadly hurricane Matthew as it kills 69 and prepares to hit the US TODAY

Hurricane Matthew is expected to hit southern Florida late this evening and move up the East Coast

Powerful storm claimed at least 69 lives as it ripped through Haiti and the Dominican Republic on Tuesday

The storm intensified to a 'catastrophic' category-four this morning with sustained winds of 140mph

National Weather Service has advised 'loss of life' and 'immense human suffering' is possible

Approximately seven million people could be left without power and some areas left 'uninhabitable'

Two million people in the US have been urged to evacuate their homes in preparation for a 'direct hit'

Gov. Scott warned Florida warns that the storm 'is going to kill people' after declaring a state emergency

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley said only 175,000 have evacuated so far, warning 'that's not enough'

Eerie satellite images of Matthew over Haiti show the storm forming a grinning skull with glowing red eye

By Regina F. Graham and Hannah Parry For and Associated Press Published: 20:46 EST, 5 October 2016 | Updated: 10:12 EST, 6 October 2016

More than two million people in the US have been urged to evacuate their homes because Hurricane Matthew 'is going to kill people' as it strengthens on its way towards the East Coast. Thousands of families have been caught in gridlock in Florida, the Carolinas and Georgia after fleeing their homes ahead of the storm - which is expected to strike Miami early on Friday morning with winds of up to 145mph. Governor Rick Scott of Florida, reiterating a call for people to evacuate on Thursday morning said there is no reason not to leave the state. 'Do not surf. Do not go on the beach. This will kill you,' he said. The powerful category-four hurricane, the fiercest Caribbean storm in nearly a decade, has already killed at least 65 people in Haiti and four in the Dominican Republic on Tuesday. At its height, the hurricane was a Category 5 with wind speeds of more than 157 mph. The National Weather Service has advised that 'loss of life' and 'immense human suffering' is possible for those who don't take precautions. It could also potentially leave approximately seven million people without power. President Barack Obama warned: 'I want to emphasise to the public - this is a serious storm. If there is an evacuation order in your community, you need to take it seriously.' 'Just remember that you can always rebuild,' he added. 'You can always repair property. You cannot restore a life if it is lost and we want to make sure that we minimize any possible loss of life or risk to people in these areas. The storm gained new muscle over the Bahamas on Thursday morning as it battered the island. The National Hurricane Center warned at 5am that it was about 60 miles south-southeast of Nassau, the capital, which is located on New Providence – home to about 70 per cent of the country's 250,000 people. Forecasters said the hurricane is likely to hit Florida at around 2am on Friday before heading northwards past Orlando, Jacksonville and up to Charleston. Some models have suggested that the storm may go out to sea and then do a U-turn and head back to Florida for a devastating double hit. Gov Scott, warned his state that they needed to 'prepare for a direct hit' as he declared a state of emergency. 'That means people have less than 24 hours to prepare, evacuate and shelter. Having a plan in place could mean the difference between life and death.' He added that all residents on Florida's Atlantic coast should expect to lose power, 'possibly for a long period of time.' 'We don't know exactly where this storm's going. Don't trust this track.' He warned of heavy rain, strong rip currents, beach erosion and storm surge. 'Unfortunately this is going to kill people,' he reiterated. 'Evacuate, evacuate, evacuate. Be prepared. Don't take a chance.' As well as the potential loss of life, researchers at the University of Michigan, Ohio State and Texas A&M have warned Matthew could knock out power for approximately seven million people. The National Weather Service also warned that the hurricane could cause the 'complete destruction of mobile homes' adding that certain areas could be rendered 'uninhabitable for weeks of months'. Some 3,000 people have already checked into shelters across the state ahead of Matthew's approach. In preparation, residents flocked to hardware stores, grocery stores and gas stations, stripping them of vital supplies. One Florida, resident Randy Jordan of Juniper, told WPEC people were shoving each other as they raced to buy the supplies they needed at the local Home Depot. 'The vibe on the street this morning is pre-panic,' Jordan said. 'By tomorrow, it should just be a brawl.' Evacuations began Wednesday and at 3pm, Brevard County commissioners ordered one of the Florida's first evacuations for residents of Merritt Island and other barrier islands. Martin County has also ordered for homes along the Barrier Islands and Sewall's Point, as well as for residents living in low-lying areas or manufactures homes. In South Florida, lines at grocery stores were heavier than usual and some essentials were in short supply. When Simone Corrado and her husband tried to buy water at their Publix in Davie near Fort Lauderdale, they mostly found empty shelves. There were a few bottles of high-end water brands, but there was so much empty shelf space that Corrado lay down and fully stretched out on the bottom shelf. 'I got scared because all that was left at Publix was just the pricey water,' said Corrado, who lived through 1992's catastrophic Hurricane Andrew, which practically leveled the nearby city of Homestead. 'They really put the fear into you here. On the television screen every few minutes is the 'beep, beep, Near Miami Beach, The Home Depot in Davie briefly ran out of propane for gas barbecues and the supply of batteries was dwindling. People bought plywood to cover windows, tarps to put over outdoor furniture and coolers for food storage. Anesthesiologist Darby Lipka lugged a 20-pound propane tank across the parking lot, saying he had already purchased food and water. He installed hurricane windows years ago so he wouldn't need to erect shutters 'I am just trying to be prepared,' he said. Dane Vaala, a diesel mechanic, was loading plywood onto his pickup. He needed it so he could stand on his awning to install upper floor shutters at his home. He moved to Florida from Montana in 2007, so Matthew would be his first storm. He had loaded up on canned food and water. 'I'm not too concerned — it doesn't really bother me much,' he said. 'But it is better to prep.' Theme parks such as Walt Disney World, Universal and Sea World were also keeping a close eye on the storm and warned customers they could expect different closing times. As of this morning, they remained open, but Disney World cancelled 'Mickey's Not So Scary Halloween Party', a special event scheduled for tonight. South Carolina has told about a quarter million people to leave the coast and Scott's counterpart Gov. Nikki Haley says she currently plans to order more evacuations for two more counties today, bringing the total to about 500,000 people. At a press conference this morning, she urged South Carolina residents to fuel up and evacuate now as everything from gas stations to pharmacies prepared to close. 'As of 6am this morning, 175,000 people have been evacuated,' she told reporters. 'That's not enough. We need to have more people evacuating. 'If you are still sitting at home, if you have not evacuated; gas stations are getting ready to close, your pharmacies are getting ready to close. Everything is going to leave because people have to protect their own families. We really do need you to think about that.' Charleston and Beaufort will continue their evacuation, and Horry and Georgetown counties will begin theirs at noon today. Bordering coastal counties - Berkeley, Colleton, Dorchester and Jasper counties - should also evacuate. 'We've been though winter storms. We've been through a 1,000-year flood. A hurricane is different. I don't want anyone to look at the last couple of tragedies we've gone through and think this is similar,' Haley said. 'We want everyone to be careful, we want everyone to take this seriously.' City officials in Charleston, which weathered Category 4 Hurricane Hugo almost 30 years ago, warned the city had run out of sandbags after distributing more than for any other storm. The city has distributed more than 15,000 sandbags. A motorist in South Carolina's Berkeley County was shot and killed by deputies during an altercation over an evacuation route. Lucas M. Felkel of Moncks Corner, 35, came to a check point, knocked down some traffic cones and sped off. Sheriff Duane Lewis said when deputies caught up with the driver a few miles away he pointed a gun at them and started shooting. 'His actions placed the officers in danger,' local Sheriff Duane Lewis said. The sheriff says when deputies finally caught up with the driver a few miles away he pointed a gun at deputies and started shooting. The sheriff says the deputies shot back, wounding the man who was taken to the hospital, where he died at 7pm yesterday. As residents in the Southeast prepared to leave their homes behind, many found that trying to get out of town was difficult due to the sheer numbers of people leaving at the same time. Hundreds of thousands were stuck in traffic on highways due to evacuation orders being issued by government officials. 'It was bumper to bumper and fairly slow for about 30 to 40 miles on either side of I-95,' Sarah Boessenecker told NBC News. 'However, people were very friendly and easygoing — no honking or impatience'. 'People seemed to know the drill and understand that traffic was going to be bad and had accepted it.' She and her husband, Robert were trying to make the trip from Charleston, South Carolina to Atlanta, where friends had offered to host them. For Lydia Dalton, she said it took her family a 'long time to get out of Charleston' on Interstate 26. 'We thought we were leaving way ahead of everyone else,' Dalton said. Residents in Charleston and Beaufort counties began their evacuations at noon on Wednesday. The National Guard was mobilized Wednesday and more than 300 buses had been set aside to transport families fleeing their homes to safety ahead of the storm, and lane reversals leading out of Charleston began at 3pm. Traffic was backed up for miles as people fled Charleston on Interstate 26, with gasoline a precious commodity with at least half a dozen stations along the coast out of fuel. Not everyone is heeding the warning to leave, however. 'We're staying because we have to board the house up,' said Buff Schwab, who stocked up on supplies yesterday. Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal declared a state of emergency in 13 coastal counties yesterday because of Hurricane Matthew. The White House said President Barack Obama canceled a campaign and health care events in Florida on Wednesday and would instead visit the headquarters of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for an update. Meanwhile airlines and cruise lines prepared for Matthew by cancelling thousands of flights and rerouting cruise stops. US airliners cancelled more than 1,500 flights on Wednesday and a further 1,070 on Thursday. Fort Lauderdale airport plans to close at 10.30am today, while Miami and Orlando airports both said they would continue monitoring the storm. American Airlines is expected to see the most cancellations, as the company has large operations in Miami and Charlotte. American and most other airlines are letting passengers change travel plans without penalty if their trip is affected. Several ports in Miami closed Wednesday and Thursday, with ships already at sea being rerouted to western Caribbean routes. The Carnival Sensation, which was set to sail from Miami Thursday will instead sail on Friday, assuming PortMiami reopens, conditions permitting. Several cruise ships are being rerouted from their regularly scheduled Caribbean and Bahamas ports to Key West. Key West is about 40 miles south of the portion of the Florida not currently under a tropical storm warning. As Hurricane Matthew approached the Bahamas, officials say nine Royal Bahamas Defence Force vessels have moored at Truman Harbor in Key West. Naval Air Station Key West spokeswoman Trice Denny says a University of Miami Rosentiel School research called the Whalton Smith is expected to arrive in port in Key West on Wednesday. THOUSANDS OF FLIGHTS CANCELLED, TRAIN SERVICES SUSPENDED AND CRUISES REROUTED AS MATTHEW SPARKS TRAVEL CHAOS Flights are cancelled, Amtrak services are suspended and streets are gridlocked as Florida braces itself for the deadly Hurricane Matthew. Flights in and out of Florida will be heavily affected today as the state's main airports warn of closures, cancellations and delays. Fort Lauderdale International Airport, Florida, has already announced plans to close today from 10.30am. Meanwhile, Miami International Airport announced yesterday it was cancelling 100 flights, both arriving and departing the airport today. Orlando International Airport say they plan to being 'reducing flights into Orlando and altering schedules starting Thursday, lasting through Friday.' Airports don't generally operate in sustained crosswinds that exceed 35 mph. Other airports across Florida have warned customers to check flight status with the airlines before heading to the airport. American Airlines, South Florida's largest carrier, has already canceled most flights slated to depart Thursday from Florida's main airports. Most airlines, including the likes of American Airlines and Delta, are also letting fliers change to a later flight with no penalty. Amtrak is also temporarily suspending services in the south due to severe weather impacting the east coast of Florida. The Silver Star 91 & 92 (New York City to Miami), Silver Meteor 97 & 98 (Miami to New York City), and the Auto Train 52 & 53 (Lorton, Va., to Sanford, Florida) services have all been cancelled for Thursday and Friday. No alternative service will run. Cruise lines are shuffling ship itineraries as PortMiami, PortEverglades and the PortMiami Tunnel were shut down. Other cruises have been delayed or have reduced scheduled to try and avoid the worst of the storm. South Carolina has told about a quarter million people to leave the coast and Gov. Nikki Haley says she currently plans to order more evacuations for two more counties Thursday, bringing the total to about 500,000 people. Hundreds of thousands were stuck in traffic on highways due to evacuation orders being issued by government officials. Waterfront hospitals and nursing homes have also been forced to evacuate in the face of the coming storm. Officials are also expecting the USNS Spearhead on Saturday, a 337-foot-long joint (Navy/Army) high-speed catamaran vessel, to be positioned in Key West for possible aid missions. The Department of State had also authorized family members of US government employees to depart the Bahamas, and issued a travel warning for the area. Dangerous high winds caused destruction as they whipped through Haiti, southern Cuba and the Dominican Republic yesterday, with flooding and landslides destroying homes, businesses and bringing down electricity lines. Haiti's interior ministry said that 65 people had died on the island, many killed by falling trees, flying debris and swollen rivers. The number includes a group of 24 people killed in the coastal town of Roche-a-Bateau. 'I've never seen anything like this,' said the town's delegate Louis Paul Raphael. Four people have also died in the the neighboring Dominican Republic. In Cuba, residents were seen walking through the rubble strewn streets, and digging through the remains of broken buildings trying to recover their belongings. A United Nations official said Hurricane Matthew has caused the biggest humanitarian crisis in Haiti since the devastating earthquake of 2010. Strong winds and heavy rain hit Haiti on Thursday, which revised its death toll to 65, including a 26-year-old man who drowned trying to rescue a child who fell into flood waters. The child was saved, authorities said. One woman was killed by a falling electrical pole. More than 430,000 were evacuated from the island, the poorest region in the Western Hemisphere, ahead of the hurricane. 'You could see a death toll in the thousands,' Colorado State University meteorologist Phil Klotzbach had warned as life-threatening 145mph winds and heavy rain battered the island. Deputy Special Representative for Haiti Mourad Wahba says in a statement that many people have been forced from their homes and communications systems have been knocked out in the country's hard-hit southwestern peninsula. He said at least 10,000 people are in shelters. Wahba says officials have received reports of destroyed houses and overflowing hospitals, with shortages fresh water. He also says the hospital in the city of Les Cayes had its roof blown off. But with a key bridge washed out, roads impassable and phone communications down, the western tip of Haiti was isolated and there was no word on dead and injured. Hours after Matthew swept onto the remote area with 145 mph winds, government leaders said they weren't close to fully gauging the impact in the vulnerable, flood-prone country where less powerful storms have killed thousands. International aid efforts were stymied Tuesday because of the lack of access to the hardest-hit areas, many residents of flooded areas seen by Associated Press reporters were wading through shin-high waters. Muddy rivers and tributaries continued to rise as water flowed down hillsides and mountains, making more flash floods and mudslides possible even Matthew tracked away from the country. During a weather forecast on Wednesday, the deadly storm seemed to take on an ominous skull shape to the shock of many viewers. The creepy picture, which appears to show a white g

:: 10-3-11   Straits Times :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Upset in Hungary after anti-migrant vote invalid

Hardline PM's rejection of refugee quotas gets huge support, but only 40% cast valid ballots

BUDAPEST • Almost all Hungarians who voted in a referendum have rejected the European Union's migrant quotas, but turnout was too low to make the results valid, frustrating Prime Minister Viktor Orban's hopes of a clear win with which to challenge Brussels. Hungary's maverick right-wing leader, whose hardline policy on migration has been criticised by human rights groups but is popular at home, nevertheless said EU policymakers should heed Sunday's "outstanding" referendum outcome. "Thirteen years after a large majority of Hungarians voted at a referendum to join the European Union, today Hungarians made their voices heard again in a European issue," Mr Orban said. "We have achieved an outstanding result, because we have surpassed the outcome of the accession referendum," he told a news conference. Some 3.249 million votes were cast against the quotas, against 2003's 3.056 million votes in favour of joining the EU. Despite the invalid result, Mr Orban said he would amend the Constitution within days to ensure the EU cannot settle migrants in Hungary. The National Election Office said on its website that 98.3 per cent of those who voted rejected the quotas, with 99.97 per cent of votes counted. Just 40 per cent of around 8.26 million eligible people had cast a valid vote, however, less than the 50 per cent needed to legitimise the results. Final results are expected next week. Along with other former Communist countries in Eastern Europe, Hungary opposes a policy that would require all EU countries to take in some of the hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers who arrived in the bloc last year. Mr Orban, who responded to the influx by sealing Hungary's southern borders with a razor-wire fence and thousands of army and police officers, said deciding whether to accept migrants is a matter of national sovereignty. He says that Hungary - with its Christian roots - does not want to take in Muslims in large numbers as they pose a security risk. Some opposition parties seized on the fact that turnout was short of the threshold needed to validate the vote, with the radical nationalist Jobbik calling the vote "a fiasco" and urging Mr Orban to quit. The opposition leftist DK party also said Mr Orban should step down. Analysts also said the invalid vote could blunt Mr Orban's efforts to force Brussels to change its migration policies. But in a sign that regional leaders were emboldened by developments in Hungary, Serbian President Tomislav Nikoli said his country should be prepared to further tighten border security even at the risk of angering the EU which it is seeking to join. Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has accused the EU of delaying the delivery of €3 billion (S$4.6 billion) promised under a landmark deal to stem the flow of migrants to Europe, saying that only €179 million had been received so far. "The year is coming to its end," Mr Erdogan said in televised comments in the capital Ankara. "They make promises, but they do not keep them," he added. REUTERS, AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE 

[ :: 6-28-09 am service ( first word ) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. All these things are end-time signs, the economy, the loss of jobs, the government control. You are in a time that the world has never seen before and that time does not get better, etc..

:: 10-4-16 Yahoo :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Exclusive: Yahoo secretly scanned customer emails for U.S. intelligence - sources

Technology News | Tue Oct 4, 2016 | 9:27pm EDT

By Joseph Menn | SAN FRANCISCO

Yahoo Inc last year secretly built a custom software program to search all of its customers' incoming emails for specific information provided by U.S. intelligence officials, according to people familiar with the matter. The company complied with a classified U.S. government demand, scanning hundreds of millions of Yahoo Mail accounts at the behest of the National Security Agency or FBI, said three former employees and a fourth person apprised of the events. Some surveillance experts said this represents the first case to surface of a U.S. Internet company agreeing to an intelligence agency's request by searching all arriving messages, as opposed to examining stored messages or scanning a small number of accounts in real time. It is not known what information intelligence officials were looking for, only that they wanted Yahoo to search for a set of characters. That could mean a phrase in an email or an attachment, said the sources, who did not want to be identified. Reuters was unable to determine what data Yahoo may have handed over, if any, and if intelligence officials had approached other email providers besides Yahoo with this kind of request. According to two of the former employees, Yahoo Chief Executive Marissa Mayer's decision to obey the directive roiled some senior executives and led to the June 2015 departure of Chief Information Security Officer Alex Stamos, who now holds the top security job at Facebook Inc. "Yahoo is a law abiding company, and complies with the laws of the United States," the company said in a brief statement in response to Reuters questions about the demand. Yahoo declined any further comment. Through a Facebook spokesman, Stamos declined a request for an interview. The NSA referred questions to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which declined to comment. The request to search Yahoo Mail accounts came in the form of a classified edict sent to the company's legal team, according to the three people familiar with the matter. U.S. phone and Internet companies are known to have handed over bulk customer data to intelligence agencies. But some former government officials and private surveillance experts said they had not previously seen either such a broad demand for real-time Web collection or one that required the creation of a new computer program. "I've never seen that, a wiretap in real time on a 'selector,'" said Albert Gidari, a lawyer who represented phone and Internet companies on surveillance issues for 20 years before moving to Stanford University this year. A selector refers to a type of search term used to zero in on specific information. "It would be really difficult for a provider to do that," he added. Experts said it was likely that the NSA or FBI had approached other Internet companies with the same demand, since they evidently did not know what email accounts were being used by the target. The NSA usually makes requests for domestic surveillance through the FBI, so it is hard to know which agency is seeking the information. Alphabet Inc's Google and Microsoft Corp, two major U.S. email service providers, separately said on Tuesday that they had not conducted such email searches. "We've never received such a request, but if we did, our response would be simple: 'No way'," a spokesman for Google said in a statement. A Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement, "We have never engaged in the secret scanning of email traffic like what has been reported today about Yahoo." The company declined to comment on whether it had received such a request. CHALLENGING THE NSA Under laws including the 2008 amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, intelligence agencies can ask U.S. phone and Internet companies to provide customer data to aid foreign intelligence-gathering efforts for a variety of reasons, including prevention of terrorist attacks. Disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and others have exposed the extent of electronic surveillance and led U.S. authorities to modestly scale back some of the programs, in part to protect privacy rights. Companies including Yahoo have challenged some classified surveillance before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a secret tribunal. Some FISA experts said Yahoo could have tried to fight last year's demand on at least two grounds: the breadth of the directive and the necessity of writing a special program to search all customers' emails in transit. Apple Inc made a similar argument earlier this year when it refused to create a special program to break into an encrypted iPhone used in the 2015 San Bernardino massacre. The FBI dropped the case after it unlocked the phone with the help of a third party, so no precedent was set. "It is deeply disappointing that Yahoo declined to challenge this sweeping surveillance order, because customers are counting on technology companies to stand up to novel spying demands in court," Patrick Toomey, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. Some FISA experts defended Yahoo's decision to comply, saying nothing prohibited the surveillance court from ordering a search for a specific term instead of a specific account. So-called "upstream" bulk collection from phone carriers based on content was found to be legal, they said, and the same logic could apply to Web companies' mail. As tech companies become better at encrypting data, they are likely to face more such requests from spy agencies. Former NSA General Counsel Stewart Baker said email providers "have the power to encrypt it all, and with that comes added responsibility to do some of the work that had been done by the intelligence agencies." SECRET SIPHONING PROGRAM Mayer and other executives ultimately decided to comply with the directive last year rather than fight it, in part because they thought they would lose, said the people familiar with the matter. Yahoo in 2007 had fought a FISA demand that it conduct searches on specific email accounts without a court-approved warrant. Details of the case remain sealed, but a partially redacted published opinion showed Yahoo's challenge was unsuccessful. Some Yahoo employees were upset about the decision not to contest the more recent edict and thought the company could have prevailed, the sources said. They were also upset that Mayer and Yahoo General Counsel Ron Bell did not involve the company's security team in the process, instead asking Yahoo's email engineers to write a program to siphon off messages containing the character string the spies sought and store them for remote retrieval, according to the sources. The sources said the program was discovered by Yahoo's security team in May 2015, within weeks of its installation. The security team initially thought hackers had broken in. When Stamos found out that Mayer had authorized the program, he resigned as chief information security officer and told his subordinates that he had been left out of a decision that hurt users' security, the sources said. Due to a programming flaw, he told them hackers could have accessed the stored emails. Stamos's announcement in June 2015 that he had joined Facebook did not mention any problems with Yahoo. ( In a separate incident, Yahoo last month said "state-sponsored" hackers had gained access to 500 million customer accounts in 2014. The revelations have brought new scrutiny to Yahoo's security practices as the company tries to complete a deal to sell its core business to Verizon Communications Inc for $4.8 billion. (Reporting by Joseph Menn; Editing by Jonathan Weber and Tiffany Wu) 

:: 10-4-16 Voice of America :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Philippines' Duterte to Obama: 'Go to Hell'

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has again lashed out at Barack Obama, this time telling the U.S. president that he can "go to hell." In a speech Tuesday, the Philippine leader also slammed the European Union, which he said could "choose purgatory, hell is filled up." The comments were in response to Western criticism of Manila's anti-drug campaign that has killed more than 3,000 people in three months. Since taking office at the end of June, Duterte has consistently painted the Western criticism as interference from colonial powers. The comments come as Manila and Washington on Tuesday launched annual military exercises. Duterte has said the war games with the U.S. will be the last in his six-year term. He vowed that "eventually I might, in my time, I will break up with America. I would rather go to Russia and to China." White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Tuesday that the U.S. had not received any request from Duterte or another Philippine official to change bilateral cooperation. "This is an alliance that is robust and that benefits both of our countries,'' Earnest said. But, Earnest insisted the U.S. will "not hesitate" to raise concerns about extrajudicial killings in the Philippines, which he said were "entirely inconsistent" with universal values of human rights. "We won't be silent in raising our significant concerns about these reports." No stranger to profanity Duterte, the former mayor of Davao, has a reputation for hitting out at his critics with profanity-filled tirades. Last month, hours before he was scheduled to meet the U.S. leader, Duterte called Obama the "son of a whore." The U.S. canceled the meeting. Duterte was forced to apologize earlier this week after he compared his war on drugs to the Nazi Holocaust of World War II. Duterte had said: "Hitler massacred three million Jews ... there's three million drug addicts. I'd be happy to slaughter them." On Sunday, he acknowledged that the comments left a "bad taste" in many mouths, and apologized to the world's Jewish community. But he said he will not apologize to the critics of his tough and often violent crackdown on suspected drug users, producers and sellers. 

:: 10-4-16 WKRG CW 55 :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Miracle League Baseball Empowers People with Disabilities

By Hayley Minogue Published: October 1, 2016, 11:16 pm Updated: October 3, 2016, 11:34 pm

Baseball is America’s past time. Miracle League has three fields and 200 players. They have disabilities, but they’re not defined by that. “I think this is an organization that has taken persons with disabilities and given them something to look forward to, to strive to,” Shirley Godwin, a chairwoman with Miracle League of Pensacola said. “They’re playing baseball just like anybody else.” One mother of a disabled player talked about her experiences with baseball growing up, and her emotions when she found out her daughter could have the same experience. “I always worried that Sierra would not have that when we realized she had a disability,” said Crystal Lane, whose daughter has played in the league since day one. “But when the miracle league was created, then that was her opportunity to have the same thing I did growing up.” Players young and old hit base hits, home runs, and grand slams every single game. Parents and coaches are seeing changes in the players. “She stays on the base, she tries to catch the ball, she knows to run the base, I mean she knows how to play baseball,” said Lane. “She didn’t know how to back then and she just wanted to run all over the field.” Volunteers that coach the teams described situation after situation where players gained more physical mobility through the sport. “Kids that were walking with walkers when they came out here that are actually walking on their own now,” said Chuck Condon, a coach. “The transformation over the years has been really amazing.” They may not be taking the diamond, but some of the parents in the stands said they’re learning just as much as their children from Miracle League. “We’re all the same, we all can just have that comfort level with each other immediately, there’s no holding back,” Lane explained. A level of comfort they only hope to extend to more and more families for seasons to come. “All we wanna do is continue to grow,” Godwin said. “We’ll build as many fields as we need and get as many volunteers as we need, as long as we grow and more people can play.” Anyone and everyone is invited to come to Miracle League games to cheer on the teams. For more information on Miracle League, you can click here. 








 ----  ><>  -----  ><>  --------- ________________________  --------  <><  ----  <><  ----

-  -  ><>  -  -       -  -  <><  -  -

Take note, all prophetic word on this page may be viewed in context by clicking on the prophetic word page, previous predictions folder with the corresponding date. 


--- --  ><>  -- - --  ><>  --  _______________  --  <><  -- - --  <><  -- ---


Past fulfilled prophecies: [Page 1 11-2003 on]

[Page 2 1-2005 on] [Page 3 1-2006 on]

[Page 4 1-2007 on]  [Page 5  1-2008 on]

[Page 6 1-2009 on]  [Page 7 1-2010 on]

[Page 8 1-2011 on]  [Page 9 1-2012 on]

[Page 10 1-2013 on]  [Page 11 1-2014 on]

[Page 12  1-2015 on]  [Page 13-2016 on]

[Page 14 9-2016 on]  [Page 15 2017 on]


--- --  ><>  -- - --  ><>  --  _______________  --  <><  -- - --  <><  -- ---


-  -  ><>  -   ___________   -   <><  -  -


[Home] [Prophetic Word]